Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:15:34.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Association of Rickettsia with Trench Fever

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Arkwright ,
A. Bacot  and
F. Martin Duncan
J. A. Arkwright
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine)
A. Bacot
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine)
F. Martin Duncan
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following contains a preliminary account of the work on the Etiology and Pathology of Trench Fever which has been done at the Lister Institute in connection with the War Office Committee on Trench Fever under the Chairmanship of Major-General Sir David Bruce, F.R.S. A first account from the Clinical side has been published in a paper by Major Byam, R.A.M.C., and his colleagues at the New End Military Hospital, Hampstead, and read before the Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in May of last year. We have been mainly dependent for our material on Major Byam and the rest of the Medical Staff of the New End Hospital and are very much indebted to them for their help and courtesy. We are under an especial obligation to Lieut. Ll. Lloyd, R.A.M.C., who has carried out that part of the entomological work done at the Hospital, taking immense pains in supervision and in obtaining the material which we required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , April 1919 , pp. 76 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

References

REFERENCES

American Red Cross Medical Research Committee. Report of Commission on Trench Fever. (1918). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacot, A. (26. xi. 1917). A contribution to the bionomics of Pediculus humanus (vertimenti) and Pediculus capitis. Parasitology, IX. p. 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byam, W. and others (v. 1918). Trench Fever, a Louse-borne Disease. Trans. Soc. of Trop. Med. and Hygiene, 05 1918, XI. No. 7.Google Scholar
Couvy, L., Dujarric, R. and De La, Riviére (12. i. 1918). Note sur l’étiologie de la fiévre des Tranchées. C. rend. Soc. Biol. LXXXI. p. 22.Google Scholar
Csernel, (28. xii. 1916). Ueber die Morphologie des Fleckfiebererregers. Wien. klin. Wochenschr. No. 52, p. 1643.Google Scholar
Davies, F. C. and Weldon, R. P. (3. ii. 1917). A preliminary contribution on “P.U.O.” (Trench Fever). Lancet, I. p. 183.Google Scholar
His, W. (3. vii. 1916). Ueber eine neue periodische Fieber-erkrankung (Febris Wolhynica). Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. p. 738.Google Scholar
Jungmann, P. (iii. 1916). Zur Aetiologie des Febris Wolhynica. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. p. 323.Google Scholar
Jungmann, P. and Kuczinski, M. H. (22. iii. 1917). Zur Klinik und Aetiologie der Febris Wolhynica (His-Wernersche Krankheit). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 359.Google Scholar
Korbsch, R. (5. x. 1916). Zur Kenntnis der Febris Wolhynica. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. p. 1217.Google Scholar
McNee, J. W., Renshaw, A. and Brunt, E. H. (12. ii. 1916). “Trench Fever,” A Relapsing Fever occurring with the British Forces in France. Brit. Med. Journ. p. 225.Google Scholar
Munk, F. and Da Rocha-Lima, H. (30. x. 1917). Klinik und Aetiologie des sogen. Wolhynischen Fiebers (Werner-Hissche Krankheit). II. Ergebnis der ätiologischen Unter-suchungen und deren Beziehungen zur Fleckfieberforschung. München. med. Wochenschr. p. 1422.Google Scholar
Nöller, W. (10. vii. 1916). Beitrag zur Flecktyphusübertragung durch Läuse. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. p. 778.Google Scholar
Ricketts, H. T. (30. i. 1909). A Microorganism which apparently has a specific relationship to Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. LII. p. 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricketts, H. T. and Wilder, R. M. (23. iv. 1910). The etiology of the Typhus Fever (Tabardillo) of Mexico City. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. LIV. p. 1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemer, (16. i. 1917). Beiträge zur Frage des Erregers des Fünftagefiebers. München. med. Wochenschr. LXIV. p. 92.Google Scholar
Da Rocha-Lima, H.. (22. v. 1916). Zur Aetiologie des Fleckfiebers. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. LIII. p. 567.Google Scholar
Sergent, Edm., Foley, H. and Viallatte, C. (13. vi. 1914). Sur des formes microbiennes abondantes dans le corps de poux infectés par le typhus exanthématique et toujours absentes dans les poux témoins, non typhiques. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. LXXVII. p. 101.Google Scholar
Strintzing, R. (30. i. 1917). Ueber Febris quintana. München. med. Wochenschr. p. 155.Google Scholar
Strisower, R.. (30. iv. 1918). Experimentelle u. klinische Beiträge zur Febris quintana. München. med. Wochenschr. LXV. p. 476.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H.. (20. iii. 1916). Zur Aetiologie des Febris Wolhynica. Berlin. klin. Wochenschr.. p. 323.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H.. (12. x. 1916). Der Fleckfieber-erreger in der Laus. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. XLII. No. 41, p. 1251.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (17. x. 1916). Zur Ursache und Uebertragung des wolhynischen Fiebers. München. med. Wochenschr. No. 42, p. 1495.Google Scholar
Töpfer, H. (24. vi. 1917). Ursache und Uebertragung der Kriegsnephritis. Medizin. Klinik, p. 678.Google Scholar
Werner, H., Benezler, J., and Wiese, O. (19. ix. 1916). Zur Aetiologie des Fünftagefiebers. München. med. Wochenschr. p. 1369.Google Scholar
Werner, H., and Benzler, J. (22. v. 1917). Zur Aetiologie und Klinik der Febris quintana. München. med. Wochenschr. p. 695.Google Scholar
Wolbach, S. B. (1916–1917). The etiology of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Journ. Med. Research, XXXIV. No. 1, p. 121, XXXV. No. 1, p. 147.Google Scholar