Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 1

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Application of the multifactor dimensionality reduction method in evaluation of the roles of multiple genes/enzymes in multidrug-resistant acquisition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Application of the multifactor dimensionality reduction method in evaluation of the roles of multiple genes/enzymes in multidrug-resistant acquisition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Application of the multifactor dimensionality reduction method in evaluation of the roles of multiple genes/enzymes in multidrug-resistant acquisition in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Summary

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) infections are major threats to healthcare-associated infection control and the intrinsic molecular mechanisms of MDRPA are also unclear. We examined 348 isolates of P. aeruginosa, including 188 MDRPA and 160 non-MDRPA, obtained from five tertiary-care hospitals in Guangzhou, China. Significant correlations were found between gene/enzyme carriage and increased rates of antimicrobial resistance (P < 0·01). gyrA mutation, OprD loss and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) presence were identified as crucial molecular risk factors for MDRPA acquisition by a combination of univariate logistic regression and a multifactor dimensionality reduction approach. The MDRPA rate was also elevated with the increase in positive numbers of those three determinants (P < 0·001). Thus, gyrA mutation, OprD loss and MBL presence may serve as predictors for early screening of MDRPA infections in clinical settings.

INTRODUCTION

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is among the most commonly isolated pathogens in healthcare-associated settings worldwide [13] often causing serious infections in various body sites, including sputum, urine and wounds [4]. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa readily acquires resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents and the rate of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRPA) healthcare-associated infections has risen sharply over past decades [5]. The infections caused by MDRPA are problematic not only because they restrict therapeutic options, but also because they may result in higher mortality rates and longer hospital stay compared to non-MDRPA [6].

The mechanisms of resistance against antibacterial agents in P. aeruginosa are complex and include the loss of the outer membrane channel protein OprD [7], presence of β-lactamase genes and expression of β-lactamase enzyme genes [8, 9], aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) [10], presence of integrons [11, 12], and mutations of quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) in gyrA and parC genes [13]. The application of conventional statistical methods, such as logistic regression models and stratified analysis to analyse the contribution of various factors in the acquisition of antimicrobial drug resistance has obvious limitations in identification of high-order interactions of multiple factors. However, the multifactor dimensionality reduction approach offers some resolution of this difficult issue and has been widely applied to the evaluation of the effect of high-level gene–gene and/or gene–environment interactions on susceptibilities of complex diseases [14, 15].

In this study, we collected P. aeruginosa isolates from five tertiary-care hospitals in Guangzhou, China and determined the possible relationships between various potential molecular resistance determinants and antimicrobial susceptibility. Subsequently, we used a multifactor dimensionality reduction approach to detect the optimal combination of determinants as predictors of MDRPA infections in clinical settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setting and study design

The study was carried out from July 2008 to December 2012 in five tertiary-care hospitals in Guangzhou, China, and the subjects were P. aeruginosa-infected patients.

The study consisted of three parts. First, was surveillance of the relationships between genes/enzymes and susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics tested. Second, a combination of univariate logistic regression analysis and multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis was used to explore the underlying predictors of MDRPA. Finally, a descriptive study was used to identify the relationship between MDRPA rate and positive number of screened factors.

Microbiological experiments

P. aeruginosa isolates were confirmed by the Vitek 32 microbial identification system (bioMérieux, France), and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2012) [16]. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to seven antimicrobial classes: cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime), penicillins (piperacillin and ticarcillin), β-lactamase inhibitors (piperacillin-tazobactam), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin), fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin), carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), and monobactams (aztreonam). All resistant and intermediate susceptible isolates were classified as the resistant-strain group and patients were categorized as being in the MDRPA group if their strains were non-susceptible to ⩾1 agents in ⩾3 antimicrobial classes; other P. aeruginosa-positive patients were categorized in the non-MDRPA group.

Detection of relevant genes and enzymes

All P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for outer membrane channel protein OprD, β-lactamases [extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and AmpC enzyme], β-lactamase genes (bla IMP, bla VIM, bla OXA-10, bla TEM and bla PER), integrons, AME genes [aac(6 ′) and ant(3″)] and mutations in QRDR (gyrA and parC). The presence of OprD, bla IMP, bla VIM, bla OXA-10, bla TEM, bla PER, aac(6′) and ant(3″) was confirmed by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification with previously reported primers and conditions [1720]. The production of ESBLs, MBLs and AmpC was determined by the combined disk test method [21], the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test (DDST) method [22] and the modified three-dimensional test [23], respectively. The mutation of QRDR in gyrA and parC genes along with the presence of integrons were determined by PCR–restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis [24], and sequencing of amplification products.

Statistical analysis

The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were displayed as resistant rates together with their 95% confidential intervals (CIs) as error bar plots. The χ 2 test for gender and Mann–Whitney U test for age were used to test demographical differences between MDRPA patients and non-MDRPA patients. The univariate logistic regression analysis was applied to detect potentially significant genes/enzymes that may impact on MDRPA acquisition. Those genes/enzymes with P < 0·2 in the logistic regression model were entered into Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction software (v. 2.0, Beta 8.1; Computational Genetics Laboratory, USA) to explore high-order interactions and other analyses were perfprmed using Stata software v. 13.1 (StataCorp., USA).

RESULTS

Characteristics of study subjects

During the study period, a total of 348 P. aeruginosa subjects, including 188 MDRPA patients and 160 non-MDRPA patients, were eligible for inclusion. The majority of patients in both groups were male (MDRPA: 116/188, 70·6%; non-MDRPA: 113/160; 61·7%) (χ 2 = 3·06, P = 0·08). The median age for both groups was 73 years and there was no difference in age distribution between the two groups (z = −0·24, P = 0·81).

Resistance determinants and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles

The 14 genes/enzymes were divided into five determinant groups: (i) loss of OprD, (ii) presence of integrons, (iii) gyrA and parC mutations, (iv) presence of aac (6 ′) and ant (3″) genes, and (v) presence of β-lactamase-related markers (ESBLs, MBLs, AmpC, bla IMP-1, bla VIM-2, bla OXA-10, bla TEM and bla PER). A strain was considered positive for the determinants group if it tested positive for at least one determinant in the group. The resistant rates and 95% CIs of seven antibiotic classes are shown by stratification of each respective determinant group (Fig. 1). By χ 2 test, each determinant group significantly enhanced the resistant rates of all agent categories (P < 0·01).

Fig. 1. Effects of determinants on antimicrobial susceptibility stratified by (a) loss of OprD; (b) presence of integrons; (c) presence of β-lactamase-related markers; (d) mutation of quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs); (e) presence of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme (AME) genes.

Univariate logistic regression analysis

The results of the univariate logistic regression analysis on the 14 molecular factors that possibly influenced the occurrence of MDRPA, revealed that all of the molecular factors, except bla PER, were positively associated with multidrug-resistant acquisition (Table 1).

Table 1. Univariate logistic regression analysis of 14 genes/enzymes for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA)

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MBLs, metallo-β-lactamases; ESBLs, extended spectrum β-lactamases.

* Results of exact logistic regression analysis.

Multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis

Thirteen factors with a significance value of P < 0·2 in univariate logistic regression analysis were analysed by Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction software (Table 2). The three factors of OprD loss, gyrA mutation and presence of MBLs proved to be the most accurate model, with a testing balanced accuracy of 0·7612 and a cross-validation consistency of 10/10 (permutation P = 0·0016). This interaction model was associated with a 14·83-fold increased risk for MDRPA acquisition (95% CI 8·18–26·88, P < 0·0001).

Table 2. Gene/enzyme interaction model by multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis

TBA, Testing balanced accuracy; CVC, cross-validation consistency; MBL, metallo-β-lactamase.

In the interaction model for the three factors (Fig. 2), the cells in the left of the figure, represent the MDRPA cases with the non-MDRPA cases on the right. This shows that only those patients infected with P. aeruginosa with OprD carriage, normal gyrA, and deficient in MBLs were associated with the lowest risk of MDRPA. Moreover, the interactions between the four factors (gyrA mutation, MBL presence, AmpC presence, and OprD loss) shown in the tree diagram (Fig. 3) all proved to be synergistic and the intensities of synergistic effect are linked to the distances between these factors which indicates that the interactions possibly promote the occurrence of MDRPA.

Fig. 2. A multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of the three-factor [gyrA, OprD and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)] interaction model.

Fig. 3. A tree diagram of the interactions of gyrA mutation, production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), AmpC positivity and loss of OprD, analysed by multifactor dimensionality reduction.

Association between positive number of screened factors and MDRPA rate

The relationships between the number of screened determinants (gyrA mutation, OprD loss and MBL presence) and MDRPA rate are displayed in Figure 4. According to results of the linear-by-linear association test, the rate of MDRPA increased significantly with the number of determinants (P < 0·001). These results further support our premise that the interactions observed above in the determinants are indeed synergistic.

Fig. 4. Association of gyrA mutation, OprD loss and production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) with rate of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA).

DISCUSSION

Over the past decades, several investigations have described the distribution of antimicrobial resistance profiles and molecular determinant carriage in P. aeruginosa isolates. However, epidemiological studies of interactions of molecular factors with antimicrobial resistance are rarely reported. In this work, we applied a multifactor dimensionality reduction approach to evaluate the roles of molecular-factor interactions in acquiring multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa strains from infected patients.

Mutation of the gyrA gene proved to be the strongest single factor in our multifactor dimensionality reduction model, and was found in 31·4% of MDRPA patients compared to 4·4% of non-MDRPA patients. This mutation has been considered to be one of the most dominant risk factors associated with resistance to fluoroquinolones [25]. Moreover, gyrA mutations were found to be the most stable genetic markers in P. aeruginosa high-risk XDR/MDR ST175 clones in several outbreaks in Spain [2629]. Another key molecular determinant in our model, OprD loss, was observed in 31·4% of MDRPA strains and 5·6% of non-MDRPA strains. Loss of OprD in the outer membrane contributes mainly to resistance to carbapenems, especially imipenem. A study by Hocquet et al. [30] of 18 P. aeruginosa isolates found that only four P. aeruginosa isolates, with significantly higher minimum inhibitory concentrations for values of imipenem, were correlated with OprD deficiency, and resistance was little affected by other tested mechanisms. Moreover, changes in amino-acid sequences of OprD in several P. aeruginosa isolates from Sweden and Norway was the predominant mechanism of high-level carbapenem resistance reported by Giske et al. [31].

The production of MBLs also proved to be an important determinant in our optimal multifactor dimensionality reduction model as almost 20% of MDRPA were MBL producers compared to 1·2% of non-MDRPA strains. These findings are partly consistent with an earlier study from Japan which reported a 75% MBL carriage rate in P. aeruginosa isolates which were all were classified as MDRPA [32]. Similarly, production of MBLs was identified as a major mechanism for MDRPA acquisition in Indian isolates [33]. By contrast, production of MBLs appears to have been rare in isolates from Spain [20, 34], Bulgaria [35], Germany [36] and the USA [37]. These marked geographical variations may be due to multiple factors such as differences in antimicrobial prescribing practice, human genetics, and infection control policies.

Besides the impacts of the three dominant factors identified here, MDRPA acquisition was also influenced by interactions of multiple resistance genes and enzymes. It is clear that each determinant group markedly elevated the resistant rates to all antibiotic classes tested (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, all other factors, except bla PER, were statistically correlated with MDRPA in the univariate logistic regression analysis (Table 1). Such interplay of multiple factors is supported by previous studies which noted the combined effects of diminished OprD production, presence of AmpC and efflux systems on carbapenem resistance [38]. By contrast with another study which reported an antagonistic effect between production of MBLs and loss of OprD in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa [39], we found that interactions of tested factors were all synergistic (Figs 3 and 4).

The influence of several molecular factors on the spread of infection and its control should not be ignored although the latter was not included as an effective MDRPA determinant in our study. For example, the presence of bla OXA-10, bla PER, and integron carriage was associated with antimicrobial resistance and some factors proved to be significant predictors of MDRPA by logistic regression analysis. Thus, their relationships with MDRPA infections should be examined in further large-scale studies.

In summary, we have shown the interaction of multiple genes/enzymes and MDRPA infections in hospital patients using multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis. Our findings indicate that a combination of OprD loss, gyrA mutation and production of MBLs may facilitate the prediction of multidrug resistance in P. aeruginosa, and this may be widely applied to the early screening of clinical MDRPA strains in local diagnostic laboratories. Additional studies with a larger sample size and more molecular determinants from various regions and countries are warranted to establish the validity of such an approach to improve infection control in hospitals.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by Guangdong Science and Technology Planning Project (grant no. 2008B030301034). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

1. Farrell, DJ, et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from hospitalised patients with pneumonia in US and European medical centres (2012). International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2014; 43: 533539.
2. Mirsoleymani, SR, et al. Bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns in pediatric urinary tract infections: a four-year surveillance study (2009–2012). International Journal of Pediatrics 2014; 2014: 126142.
3. Ott, E, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial and community acquired infections in a university hospital: an observational study. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 2013; 110: 533540.
4. Peng, Y, et al. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections pose growing threat to health care-associated infection control in the hospitals of Southern China: a case-control surveillance study. American Journal of Infection Control 2014; 42: 13081311.
5. Obritsch, MD, et al. National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from intensive care unit patients from 1993 to 2002. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004; 48: 46064610.
6. Aloush, V, et al. Propylthiouracil-induced autoimmune syndromes: two distinct clinical presentations with different course and management. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2006; 36: 49.
7. Castanheira, M, et al. Mutation-driven beta-lactam resistance mechanisms among contemporary ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. hospitals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2014; 58: 68446850.
8. Ranjan, S, Banashankari, G, Babu, PS. Comparison of epidemiological and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of metallo-beta-lactamase-positive and metallo-beta-lactamase-negative strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Journal of Laboratory Physicians 2014; 6: 109113.
9. Zafer, MM, et al. Antimicrobial resistance pattern and their beta-lactamase encoding genes among Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from cancer patients. BioMed Research International 2014; 2014: 101635.
10. Kim, JY, et al. Occurrence and mechanisms of amikacin resistance and its association with beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Korean nationwide study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2008; 62: 479483.
11. Kiddee, A, et al. Nosocomial spread of class 1 integron-carrying extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in a Thai hospital. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2013; 42: 301306.
12. Wu, K, et al. Class 1 integron gene cassettes in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in southern China. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2012; 40: 264267.
13. Matsumoto, M, et al. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes and in vitro activities of fluoroquinolones in 114 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa derived from urinary tract infections and their rapid detection by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2012; 40: 440444.
14. Fu, L, et al. Investigation of JAK1 and STAT3 polymorphisms and their gene-gene interactions in nonspecific digestive disorder of rabbits. Gene 2014; 543: 814.
15. Pereira, C, et al. Genetic variability in key genes in prostaglandin E2 pathway (COX-2, HPGD, ABCC4 and SLCO2A1) and their involvement in colorectal cancer development. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e92000.
16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 22nd informational supplement M100-S22. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2012.
17. Mirsalehian, A, et al. Detection of VEB-1, OXA-10 and PER-1 genotypes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burn patients. Burns 2010; 36: 7074.
18. Noppe-Leclercq, I, et al. PCR detection of aminoglycoside resistance genes: a rapid molecular typing method for Acinetobacter baumannii . Research in Microbiology 1999; 150: 317322.
19. Yan, JJ, et al. Metallo-beta-lactamases in clinical Pseudomonas isolates in Taiwan and identification of VIM-3, a novel variant of the VIM-2 enzyme. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2001; 45: 22242228.
20. Gutierrez, O, et al. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spanish hospitals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 43294335.
21. Livermore, DM, Brown, DF. Detection of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2001; 48 (Suppl. 1): 5964.
22. Lee, K, et al. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-beta-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 46234629.
23. Manchanda, V, Singh, NP. Occurrence and detection of AmpCbeta-lactamases among Gram-negative clinical isolates using a modified three-dimensional test at Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2003; 51: 415418.
24. Reinhardt, A, et al. Development and persistence of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a longitudinal observation in mechanically ventilated patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 13411350.
25. Ruiz, J. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones: target alterations, decreased accumulation and DNA gyrase protection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2003; 51: 11091117.
26. Cabot, G, et al. Genetic markers of widespread extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2012; 56: 63496357.
27. Garcia-Castillo, M, et al. Wide dispersion of ST175 clone despite high genetic diversity of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains in 16 Spanish hospitals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2011; 49: 29052910.
28. Riera, E, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosacarbapenem resistance mechanisms in Spain: impact on the activity of imipenem, meropenem and doripenem. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2011; 66: 20222027.
29. Viedma, E, et al. VIM-2-producing multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST175 clone, Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2012; 18: 12351241.
30. Hocquet, D, et al. Genetic and phenotypic variations of a resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic clone. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2003; 47: 18871894.
31. Giske, CG, et al. Alterations of porin, pumps, and penicillin-binding proteins in carbapenem resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Microbial Drug Resistance 2008; 14: 2330.
32. Sekiguchi, J, et al. Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in community hospitals in Japan. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007; 45: 979989.
33. Ramakrishnan, K, et al. Molecular characterization of metallo beta-lactamase producing multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from various clinical samples. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 2014; 57: 579582.
34. Cabot, G, et al. Overexpression of AmpC and efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections: prevalence and impact on resistance in a Spanish multicenter study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2011; 55: 19061911.
35. Vatcheva-Dobrevska, R, et al. Molecular epidemiology and multidrug resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Bulgarian hospitals. Microbial Drug Resistance 2013; 19: 355361.
36. Henrichfreise, B, et al. Resistance mechanisms of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from Germany and correlation with hypermutation. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2007; 51: 40624070.
37. Tam, VH, et al. Prevalence, resistance mechanisms, and susceptibility of multidrug-resistant bloodstream isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2010; 54: 11601164.
38. Quale, J, et al. Interplay of efflux system, ampC, and oprD expression in carbapenem resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2006; 50: 16331641.
39. Shu, JC, et al. Interplay between mutational and horizontally acquired resistance mechanisms and its association with carbapenem resistance amongst extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA). International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2012; 39: 217222.