Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Mapping Landscape Values: Issues, Challenges and Lessons Learned from Field Work on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington

  • Diane T. Besser (a1), Rebecca McLain (a2), Lee Cerveny (a3), Kelly Biedenweg (a4) and David Banis (a5)...

Abstract

In order to inform natural resource policy and land management decisions, landscape values mapping (LVM) is increasingly used to collect data about the meanings that people attach to places and the activities associated with those places. This type of mapping provides geographically referenced data on areas of high density of values or associated with different types of values. This article focuses on issues and challenges that commonly occur in LVM, drawing on lessons learned in the US Forest Service Olympic Peninsula Human Ecology Mapping Project. The discussion covers choosing a spatial scale for collecting data, creating the base map, developing data collection strategies, the use of ascribed versus assigned values, and the pros and cons of different mapping formats. Understanding the common issues and challenges in LVM will assist policy makers, land managers, and researchers in designing a LVM project that effectively balances project goals, time and budgetary constraints, and personnel resources in a way that ensures the most robust data and inclusive public participation.

Environmental Practice 16: 138–150 (2014)

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to: Diane T. Besser, Institute for Sustainable Solutions, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751; (phone) 503-784-7109 (cell); (fax) 503-725-2690; (e-mail) dianebesser@pdx.edu.

References

Hide All
Alcorn, J.B. 2000. Borders, Rules, and Governance: Mapping to Catalyse Changes in Policy and Management. Gatekeeper Series 91. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, 24 pp. Available at http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/X180IIED.pdf.
Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., and Brown, G.. 2008. Social–Ecological Hotspots Mapping: A Spatial Approach for Identifying Coupled Social–Ecological Space. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(1):2739.
Apitz, S.E. 2013. Ecosystem Services and Environmental Decision Making: Seeking Order in Complexity. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9(2):214230.
Beverly, J.L., Uto, K., Wilkes, J., and Bothwel, P.. 2008. Assessing Spatial Attributes of Forest Landscape Values: An Internet-Based Participatory Mapping Approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38(2):289303.
Biedenweg, K., McLain, R., and Cerveny, L.. 2014. Values Mapping with Latino Forest Users: Contributing to the Dialogue on Multiple Land Use Conflict Management. Practicing Anthropology 36(1):3337.
Brown, G.G., and Pullar, D.V.. 2012. An Evaluation of the Use of Points Versus Polygons in Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Using Quasi-experimental Design and Monte Carlo Simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26(2):231246.
Brown, G.G., and Reed, P.. 2000. Validation of a Forest Values Typology for Use in National Forest Planning. Forest Science 46(2):240247.
Brown, G.G., and Reed, P.. 2009. Public Participation GIS: A New Method for Use in National Forest Planning. Forest Science 55(2):166182.
Brown, G.G., Reed, P., and Harris, C.C.. 2002. Testing a Place-Based Theory for Environmental Evaluation: An Alaska Case Study. Applied Geography 22(1):4976.
Bryan, J. 2011. Walking the Line: Participatory Mapping, Indigenous Rights, and Neoliberalism. Geoforum 42(1):4050.
Cacciapaglia, M.A., Yung, L., and Patterson, M.E.. 2012. Place Mapping and the Role of Spatial Scale in Understanding Landowner Views of Fire and Fuels Management. Society & Natural Resources 25(5):453467.
Cheng, A.S., Kruger, L.E., and Daniels, S.E.. 2003. “Place” as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda. Society & Natural Resources 16(2):87104.
Craig, W.J., Harris, T.M., and Weiner, D.. 2002. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems. Taylor & Francis, London, 416 pp.
Donovan, S.M., Looney, C., Hanson, T., Sánchez de León, Y., Wulfhorst, J.D., Eigenbrode, S.D., Jennings, M., Johnson-Maynard, J., and Bosque Pérez, N.A.. 2009. Reconciling Social and Biological Needs in an Endangered Ecosystem: The Palouse as a Model for Bioregional Planning. Ecology & Society 14(1):124.
Endter-Wada, J., and Blahna, D.J.. 2011. Linkages to Public Land Framework: Toward Embedding Humans in Ecosystem Analyses by Using “Inside-out Social Assessment”. Ecological Applications 21(8):32543271.
Fagerholm, N., and Käyhkö, N.. 2009. Participatory Mapping and Geographical Patterns of the Social Landscape Values of Rural Communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia 187(1):4360.
Fagerholm, N., Käyhkö, N., Ndumbaro, F., and Khamis, M.. 2012. Community Stakeholders’ Knowledge in Landscape Assessments—Mapping Indicators for Landscape Services. Ecological Indicators 18:421433.
Farnum, J.O., and Kruger, L.E., eds. 2008. April. Place-Based Planning: Innovations and Applications from Four Western Forests. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-741. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 44 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr741.pdf.
Feinberg, R., Dymon, U.J., Paiaki, P., Rangituteki, P., Nukuriaki, P., and Rollins, M.. 2003. “Drawing the Coral Heads”: Mental Mapping and Its Physical Representation in a Polynesian Community. Cartographic Journal 40(3):243253.
Gould, P.R.. 1970. On Mental Maps. In. Man, Space, and Environment: Concepts in Contemporary Human Geography. Oxford University Press, New York, 260282.
Hall, T.E., Farnum, J.O., Slider, T.C., and Ludlow, K.. 2009. August. New Approaches to Forest Planning Inventorying and Mapping Place Values in the Pacific Northwest Region. Research Note PNW-RN-562. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, 20 pp. Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_rn562.pdf.
Herlihy, P.H. 2003. Participatory Research Mapping of Indigenous Lands in Darién, Panama. Human Organization 62(4):315331.
Higgins, G.M., Kassam, A.H., Van Velthuizen, H.T., and Purnell, M.F.. 1987. Methods Used by FAO to Estimate Environmental Resources, Potential Output of Crops, and Population Supporting Capacities in the Developing Countries. In Agricultural Environments, Characterization, Classification and Mapping, A.H. Bunting, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, England, 171185.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). 2009. Good Practices in Participatory Mapping: A Review Prepared for the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). IFAD, Rome, 56 pp. Available at http://www.ifad.org/pub/map/pm_web.pdf.
Kahneman, D. 2013. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 512 pp.
Kaplowitz, M.D., Hadlock, T.D., and Levine, R.. 2004. A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 68(1):94101.
Mather, R.A. 2000. Using Photomaps to Support Participatory Processes of Community Forestry in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development 20(2):154161.
McCall, M.K., and Dunn, C.E.. 2012. Geo-information Tools for Participatory Spatial Planning: Fulfilling the Criteria for “Good” Governance? Geoforum 43(1):8194.
McLain, R., Cerveny, L., Besser, D., Banis, D., Biedenweg, K., Todd, A., Kimball-Brown, C., and Rohdy, S.. 2013a. Mapping Human-Environment Connections on the Olympic Peninsula: An Atlas of Landscape Values. US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, 87 pp Available at http://www.pdx.edu/geography/sites/www.pdx.edu.geography/files/HEMAtlas6_18_2013.pdf.
McLain, R., Poe, M., Biedenweg, K., Cerveny, L., Besser, D., and Blahna, D.. 2013b. Making Sense of Human Ecology Mapping: An Overview of Approaches to Integrating Socio-Spatial Data into Environmental Planning. Human Ecology 41(5):651665.
Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K., and Kaminoff, R.. 1983. Place-identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3(1):5783.
Raymond, C.M., Bryan, B.A., MacDonald, D.H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., and Kalivas, T.. 2009. Mapping Community Values for Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics 68(5):13011315.
Rindfuss, R.R., Walsh, S.J., Turner, II, Fox, J., and Mishra, V.. 2004. Developing a Science of Land Change: Challenges and Methodological Issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101(39):1397613981.
Rolston, H., and Coufal, J.. 1991. A Forest Ethic and Multivalue Forest Management. Journal of Forestry 89(4):3540.
Tuan, Y.-F.. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Tales and Travels of a School Inspector Series. University of Minnesota Press, St. Paul, 235 pp.
Tyrvainen, L., Makinen, K., and Schipperijn, J.. 2007. Tools for Mapping Social Values of Urban Woodlands and Other Green Areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1):519.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2009. Agriculture Secretary Vilsack Presents National Vision for America’s Forests. News Transcript Release 0382.09. USDA Office of Communications, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=2009/08/0382.xml.
US Department of Agriculture/US Forest Service (USDA/USFS). 2012. April 9. 36 CFR 219: National Forest System Land Management Planning, 2012 edition. USDA/USFS, Washington, DC, 24 pp. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CFR-2003-title36-vol2/CFR-2003-title36-vol2-part219/content-detail.html.
Williams, D.R., and Stewart, S.I.. 1998. Sense of Place: An Elusive Concept That Is Finding a Home in Ecosystem Management. Journal of Forestry 96(5):1823, Available at http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/rmrs_1998_williams_d002.pdf.
Wright, J.K. 1942. Map Makers Are Human: Comments on the Subjective in Maps. Geographical Review 32(4):527544.
Zhu, X., Pfueller, S., Whitelaw, P., and Winter, C.. 2010. Spatial Differentiation of Landscape Values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental Management 45(5):896911.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed