Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T15:19:36.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: On the Use of Goal-Oriented Project Planning for Protected Area Management in Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Joel T. Heinen  and
Santosh Rayamajhi
Joel T. Heinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Studies, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
Santosh Rayamajhi
Affiliation:
Santosh Rayamajhi, Institute of Forestry Pokhara Campus, Pokhara, Nepal
*
Joel T. Heinen, Department of Environmental Studies, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, Miami, FL 33199; (e-mail) heinenj@fiu.edu.
Get access

Extract

As a result of increased awareness about the nature and extent of park-people conflicts in Nepal in the 1980s—and the liberalization of protected area management worldwide—great strides have been made in-country that have liberalized protected area management and allowed for some local control of resources. A new category of protected area and a comprehensive buffer zone policy are hallmarks of the government's efforts at involving local people in protected area management during the 1990s. As with many other least-developed nations, however, Nepal has lacked resources for the formulation of comprehensive management plans for its protected areas. The Park People Programme, a multiyear project of the United Nations Development Programme and the Government of Nepal, has recently instituted Goal-Oriented Project Planning as an inexpensive way to plan managerial activities needed to conserve resources within protected areas and buffer zones. The technique relies on the use of management planning workshops that include representatives of important interest groups, and follow-up workshops for implementation. Here we describe the approach and discuss its strengths and weaknesses. Strengths include the fact that the approach is efficient and cost-effective given limited financial and human resources in the conservation sector typical of most developing countries. Weaknesses include the very short duration of meetings and lack of budgetary information needed to implement plans over the entire planning period. The method shows potential for expansion in Nepal and adoption by other nations, but several improvements and follow-up activities are needed based on this assessment and on qualitative information gathered from workshop participants. These include longer workshops, more facilitators, and long-term assessments of the use of the method, as well as implementation of management plans generated by the method.

Type
Features & Reviews
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 227 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allendorf, T. D. 1999. Local Residents' Perceptions of Protected Areas in Nepal: Beyond Conflicts and Economies, (PhD Dissertation). The University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 98 pp.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. ZOPP: An Introduction to the Method. Government of Federal Republic of Germany, Berlin, 90 pp.Google Scholar
Belovsky, G. E. 1987. Extinction Models and Mammalian Persistence. In Viable Population for Conservation, Soule, M. E., ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitrakar, A. 1996. Working with NGOs. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Kathmandu, Nepal, XV + 106 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1998a. Parsa Wildlife Reserve Management Strategy Framework. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1998b. Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve Management Strategy Framework. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1998c. Royal Chitwan National Park Management Planning Workshop. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1999a. 15th Warden Conference, Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Aadhabhar. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1999b. Royal Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone Draft Management Plan (2000–2004). Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 115 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 1999c. Langtang National Park Management Strategy Framework. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 2000a. Royal Sukla Phanta Wildlife Reserve Management Strategy Framework Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 2000b. Royal Bardia National Park Management Strategy Framework. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 30 pp.Google Scholar
Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation. 2000c. Khaptad National Park Management Strategy Framework. Park People Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Glowka, L., Burhenne-Guilmtn, F., and Synge, H.. 1994. A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Dharamdasani, M. D. 1994. Nepal: Political Economy of Foreign Aid. Shalimar Publishing House, Varanasi, India, 216 pp.Google Scholar
Heinen, J. T., and Kattel, B.. 1992. Parks, People and Conservation: A Review of Management Issues in Nepal's Protected Areas. Population and Environment 14(1):49–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, J. T., and Mehta, J. N.. 1999. Conceptual and Legal Issues in the Designation and Management of Conservation areas in Nepal. Environmental Comervatian 26(1):21–29.Google Scholar
Heinen, J. T., and Mehta, J. N.. 2000. Emerging Issues in Legal and Procedural Aspects of Buffer Zone Management with Case Studies from Nepal. Journal of Environmental & Development 9(1):45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1977. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 2029 (1973). Nepal Gazette 2028, 11–28 (English Translation).Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1979. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Regulations, 2030. Second Amendment. Nepal Gazette 28(40):1–3.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1988a. Master Plan for the Forestry Sector Main Report. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 170 pp.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1988b. Building on Success: The National Conservation Strategy for Nepal. His Majesty's Government of Nepal and IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Kathmandu, Nepal, xx + 179 pp.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1989. National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act. Third Amendment. Nepal Gazette 24:1–5.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1990. The Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal, 2047 (1990). Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Kathmandu, Nepal, 115 pp.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1993a. Fourth Amendment to the National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act. Nepal Gazette, 43(Suppl.).Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1993b. Nepal Environmental Policy and Action Plan: Integrating Environment and Development. Environmental Protection Council, Kathmandu, Nepal, xxviii + 80 pp.Google Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal. 1998. National Biodiversity Action Plan Project (Draft). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal, 142 pp.Google Scholar
Keiter, R. B. 1995. Preserving Nepal's National Parks: Law and Conservation in the Developing World. Ecology Law Quarterly 22:591–675.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J., MacKinnon, K., Child, G., and Thorsell, J.. 1986. Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, xvi + 295 pp.Google Scholar
Majupuria, T. C. 1991. Sacred Animals of India and Nepal. M. Devi, Lashkar, India, iv + 242 pp.Google Scholar
Nepal, S. K., and Weber, K. E.. 1993. Struggle for Existence: Park-people Conflict in Royal Chitwan National Park. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand, xxi + 199 pp.Google Scholar
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. 1996. The Logical Framavork Approach: Handbook for Objectives-oriented Planning, Third Edition. Government of Norway, Oslo, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Park People Programme. 1998. Community-based Conservation. United Nations Development Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 56 pp.Google Scholar
Park People Programme. 1999a. Biodiversity Conservation Initiatives in and Around Protected Areas. United Nations Development Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Park People Programme. 1999b. Socio-Economic Development Initiatives in Buffer Zones. United Nations Development Programme, Kathmandu, Nepal, 40 pp.Google Scholar
Paudyal, D. P. 1994. Strategies for Local-level Planned Development in Nepal An Evaluation of the Decentralization Act of 1982 from the Local Perspective, CIP—Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Haag, Netherlands, xviii + 240 pp.Google Scholar
Peine, J. D., ed. 1998. Ecosystem Management for Sustainability: Principles and Practices Illustrated by a Regional Biosphere Reserve Cooperative. Lewis Press, Boca Raton, FL, 500 pp.Google Scholar
Redford, K. H., and Sanderson, S. E.. 2000. Extracting Humans from Nature. Conservation Biology 14(5):1362–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, C. 2000. Getting to the Table: Incentives for Participation in Regulatory Negotiations. Environmental Practice 2(2):147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A., and Nepstad, D.. 2000. Rethinking Tropical Forest Conservation: Perils in Parks. Conservation Biology 14(5):1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U. R. 1990. An Overview of Park-People Interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park. Landscape and Urban Planning 19:133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, T. N. 1999. The Implementation of the Decentralization Scheme in Nepal. Joshi Publications, Kathmandu, Nepal, vi + 175 pp.Google Scholar
Sitarz, D., ed. 1993. Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet. Earthpress, Boulder, CO, USA. × + 321 pp.Google Scholar
Studsrod, J. E., and Wegge, P.. 1995. Park-people Relationships: The Case of Damage Caused by Park Animals Around Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal, Environmental Conservation 22(2):133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamang, D. 1993. Democracy, development & NGOs. Jeewan Press, Kathmandu, Nepal, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Terborgh, I. 1999. Reauiem for Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, 246 pp.Google Scholar
Vaidya, T. R., and Bajracharya, B. R.. 1996. Nepal: Administrative and Social Reforms. Anmol Publications, New Delhi, India, vi + 218 pp.Google Scholar
World Conservation Union. 1994. Guidelines for Protected Areas Management Categories. IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, x + 261 pp.Google Scholar
Yaffee, S. L., and Wondolleck, J. M.. 2000. Lessons from a Comprehensive Assessment of Over 200 Wide-ranging Cases of Collaboration in Environmental Management. Conservation Biology in Practice 1(1):17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar