Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-v9bzm Total loading time: 0.333 Render date: 2023-02-06T14:35:30.484Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Robert G. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
Leslie B. Kirchler
Affiliation:
Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
Jackson Cothren
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, and Associate Professor, Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, Fayetteville, Arkansas
Snow L. Winters
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, Fayetteville, Arkansas
*
Robert G. Sullivan, Program Manager/Coordinator, Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439; (phone) 630-252-6182; (fax) 630-252-6090; (e-mail) sullivan@anl.gov
Get access

Abstract

Potential visual impact on coastal lands has emerged as a major concern in the development of offshore wind facilities in the United States and Europe. Optimal siting of offshore facilities requires accurate knowledge of the relationship between distance and the visibility of wind turbines. Past assessments of offshore wind turbine visibility were based on smaller turbines and facilities in use at the time and underestimate visibility for current projects, which use more and larger larger turbines. This study is a preliminary assessment of the visibility of offshore wind facilities in the United Kingdom. Study objectives included identifying the maximum distances the facilities could be seen in both daytime and nighttime views and assessing the effect of distance on visual contrasts associated with the facilities. Results showed that small to moderately sized facilities were visible to the unaided eye at distances greater than 42 km [26 miles (mi)], with turbine blade movement visible up to 39 km (24 mi). At night, aerial hazard navigation lighting was visible at distances greater than 39 km (24 mi). The observed wind facilities were judged to be a major focus of visual attention at distances up to 16 km (10 mi), were noticeable to casual observers at distances of almost 29 km (18 mi), and were visible with extended or concentrated viewing at distances beyond 40 km (25 mi).

Environmental Practice 15:33–49 (2013)

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, I.D. 2000. Determination of Thresholds of Visual Impact: The Case of Wind Turbines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29(5):707718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, I.D., and Miller, D.R.. 2007. Visual Assessment of Off-shore Wind Turbines: The Influence of Distance, Contrast, Movement, and Social Variables. Renewable Energy 32(5):814831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S. 2011. Mark Leyland to Hold Public Presentation on Proposed Offshore Wind Farm (USA). OffshoreWind.biz, July 25. Available at http://www.offshorewind.biz/2011/07/25/mark-leyland-to-hold-public-presentation-on-proposed-offshore-wind-farm-usa/ (accessed December 9, 2011).Google Scholar
ClimateWire. 2011. Offshore Wind Turbines Keep Growing in Size: Energy and Sustainability. Scientific American, September 19. Available at http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=offshore-wind-turbines-keep (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Environmental Design and Research, PC (EDR). 2003, November. Appendix 5.10-A: Visual Simulation Methodology by EDR. Visual Simulation Methodology Cape Wind Project: Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket, Massachusetts. EDR, Syracuse, NY, 15 pp. Available at http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/projects/ma/ccwf/app510a.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Environmental Design and Research, PC (EDR). 2006, July. Seascape and Shoreline Visibility Assessment. Cape Wind Energy Project: Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket, Massachusetts. EDR, Syracuse, NY, 25 pp.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1995. ExternE: Externalities of Energy, volume 6: Wind & Hydro. EUR 16525 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 249 pp. Available at http://www.externe.info/externe_d7/sites/default/files/vol6.pdf (accessed August 25, 2011).Google Scholar
European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). 2011a, March. UpWind: Design Limits and Solutions for Very Large Wind Turbines—A 20 MW Turbine Is Feasible. EWEA, Brussels, 108 pp. Available at http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/upwind/21895_UpWind_Report_low_web.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). 2011b, November. Wind in Our Sails: The Coming of Europe's Offshore Wind Energy Industry. EWEA, Brussels, 91 pp. Available at http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/ewea_documents/documents/publications/reports/23420_Offshore_report_web.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Hyslop, N.P. 2009. Impaired Visibility: The Air Pollution People See. Atmospheric Environment 43(1):182195. Available at http://air.snu.ac.kr/journals/Hyslop_AE(2009).pdf (accessed November 7, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jallouli, J., and Moreau, G.. 2009. An Immersive Path-Based Study of Wind Turbines' Landscape: A French Case in Plouguin. Renewable Energy 34(3):597607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns Hopkins University. 2011. Better Turbine Spacing for Large Wind Farms. ScienceDaily, February 7. Available at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110120111332.htm (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Kessler, R.A. 2011. Virginia Chosen for First US Offshore Wind Turbine Test Facility. Recharge, October 16. Available at http://www.rechargenews.com/energy/wind/article284011.ece (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Mahony, M. 2011, February 15. Wind Power for the Great Lakes? Canada Says ‘Nay.’ SmartPlanet, San Francisco. Available at http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/intelligent-energy/wind-power-for-the-great-lakes-canada-says-8216nay/4793?tag=search-river (accessed December 9, 2011).Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). N.d. Illustrating the Aesthetic Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines in Lake Erie. NOAA Coastal Services Center, Charleston, SC. Available at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/action/canviserie.html (accessed December 9, 2011).Google Scholar
OffshoreWind.net. 2010. North America Offshore Wind Energy Information: Activity Overview. OffshoreWind.net, Boston, MA. http://offshorewind.net/ (accessed December 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Phadke, R. 2010. Steel Forests or Smoke Stacks: The Politics of Visualisation in the Cape Wind Controversy. Environmental Politics 19(1):120. Available at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/sdn/articles/files/Phadke%20Steel%20Forests.pdf (accessed December 9, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K.E., Anderson, C., Dunsford, H., Benson, J.F., and MacFarlane, R.. 2005. An Assessment of the Sensitivity and Capacity of the Scottish Seascape in Relation to Offshore Windfarms. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report 103 (ROAME No. F03AA06). Scottish National Heritage, Inverness, Scotland, 193 pp. Available at http://www.no-tiree-array.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/SNH2-005-visual-impact-research.pdf (accessed June 6, 2011).Google Scholar
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L., Lahti, T., Roché, S., Beckman, K., Cantwell, B., and Richmond, P.. 2012. Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances in Western Landscapes. Paper presented at the National Association of Environmental Professionals 37th Annual Conference, May 21–24, Portland, OR. Available at http://visualimpact.anl.gov/windvitd/docs/WindVITD.pdf (accessed December 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Tsoutsos, T., Gouskos, Z., Karterakis, S., and Peroulaki, E.. 2007. Aesthetic Impact from Wind Parks. Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece, 10 pp. Available at http://www.massland.org/files/Aesthetic_impact_from_wind_parks.pdf (accessed June 7, 2011).Google Scholar
University of Newcastle. 2002. Visual Assessment of Windfarms Best Practice. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report F01AA303A. University of Newcastle, Edinburgh, 79 pp. Available at http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/publications/commissioned_reports/f01aa303a.pdf (accessed June 3, 2011).Google Scholar
US Bureau of Land Management (US BLM). 1984, April 15. Manual 8400: Visual Resource Management. Release 8-24. US Department of the Interior, BLM, Washington, DC, 15 pp. Available at http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/Information_Resources_Management/policy/blm_manual.Par.34032.File.dat/8400.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
US Bureau of Land Management (US BLM). 1986, January 17. Manual 8431-1: Visual Resource Contrast Rating. Release 8-30. US Department of the Interior, BLM, Washington, DC, 32 pp. Available at http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/wo/Information_Resources_Management/policy/blm_handbook.Par.79462.File.dat/8431.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior (US DOI). 2010a. Salazar Launches ‘Smart from the Start’ Initiative to Speed Offshore Wind Energy Development off the Atlantic Coast. DOI Press Release, November 28. Available at http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/Salazar-Launches-Smart-from-the-Start-Initiative-to-Speed-Offshore-Wind-Energy-Development-off-the-Atlantic-Coast.cfm (accessed December 12, 2011).Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior (US DOI). 2010b. Secretary Salazar Announces Approval of Cape Wind Energy Project on Outer Continental Shelf off Massachusetts. DOI News, April 28. Available at http://www.doi.gov/news/doinews/Secretary-Salazar-Announces-Approval-of-Cape-Wind-Energy-Project-on-Outer-Continental-Shelf-off-Massachusetts.cfm (accessed December 9, 2011).Google Scholar
Vestas. 2011, March 30. Vestas Launches Next Generation Offshore Turbine. News release 9/2011. Vestas, Aarhus, Denmark. Available at http://www.vestas.com/files//Filer/EN/Press_releases/VWS/2011/110330_VWS_NR_UK_09.pdf (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Weber, T. 2011. Danish Wind Titan: The World's Leading Wind Turbine Manufacturer Vestas Has Pushed the Dimensions of Wind Turbines with its new V-164 Offshore Turbine. Renewables International, March 31. Available at http://www.renewablesinternational.net/danish-wind-titan/150/505/30608/ (accessed December 13, 2011).Google Scholar
Wind Power. 2011. Offshore Wind Farms List. Wind Power, Roubaix, France. http://www.thewindpower.net/windfarms_offshore_en.php (accessed December 12, 2011).Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *