Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations

  • ROBERT HOME (a1), CLAUDIA KELLER (a1) (a2), PETER NAGEL (a2), NICOLE BAUER (a1) and MARCEL HUNZIKER (a1)...

Summary

Flagship species are among key marketing tools used by conservation organizations to motivate public support, but are often selected in an ad hoc, rather than systematic, manner. Furthermore, it is unclear whether selected flagship species do motivate public support. This paper describes a multi-method exploratory study, carried out in Switzerland, which aimed to determine the selection criteria for flagship species and measure whether a species selected according to these criteria was able to motivate support. Fourteen representatives of international, regional and local conservation organizations were interviewed and the selection criteria for their flagship species were identified. A charismatic species (the great spotted woodpecker) that meets these criteria and an apparently less charismatic species (the clover stem weevil) were selected as treatments in a quantitative experiment with 900 respondents. Using conjoint analysis, it was found that both charismatic and uncharismatic species have the ability to positively influence public preferences for habitat variables that encourage biodiversity in urban landscapes. These results may be used by conservation organizations to assist in the selection of flagship species, and in particular for flagship species that are intended to perform a specific conservation function.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Dr Robert Home Tel: +41 44 739 2530 Fax: +41 44 739 2588 e-mail: robert.home@wsl.ch

References

Hide All
Andelman, S.J. & Fagan, W.F. (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 59545959.
Berger, J. (1997) Population constraints associated with the use of black rhinos as an umbrella species for desert herbivores. Conservation Biology 11: 6978.
Bonn, A, Rodrigues, A.S. & Gaston, K.J. (2002) Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecology Letters 5: 307314.
Brechbühl, U. & Rey, L. (1998) Natur als Kulturelle Leistung: Zur Entstehung des Modernen Umweltdiskurses in der Mehrsprachigen Schweiz [Nature as a Cultural Performance: The Emergence of the Modern Environmental Discourse in Multilingual Switzerland]. Zurich, Switzerland: Seismo Verlag.
Caro, T., Engilis, A. & Gardner, T. (2004) Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Animal Conservation 7: 6370.
Caro, T.M. & O'Doherty, G. (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 13: 805814.
Clucas, B., McHugh, K. & Caro, T. (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 15171528.
Entwistle, A.C. & Dunstone, N. (2000) Future priorities for mammalian conservation. In: Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? ed. Entwistle, A.C. & Dunstone, N., pp. 369387. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Entwistle, A.C. & Stephenson, P.J. (2000) Small mammals and the conservation agenda. In: Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? ed. Entwistle, A.C. & Dunstone, N., pp. 119139. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Entwistle, A.C., Mickleburgh, S. & Dunstone, N. (2000) Mammal conservation: current contexts and opportunities. In: Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? ed. Entwistle, A.C. & Dunstone, N., pp. 17. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Favreau, J.M., Drew, C.A., Hess, G.R., Rubino, M.J., Koch, F.H. & Eschelbach, K.A. (2006) Recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of surrogate species approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 39493969.
Frankel, O.H. & Soulé, M.E. (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heberlein, T., Wilson, M., & Bishop, R. (2005) Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50: 122.
Holsti, O.R. (1968) Content analysis. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology, Research Methods. Vol. 2, ed. Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E., pp. 596692. London, UK: Addison Wesley.
Hunter, L. & Rinner, L. (2004) The association between environmental perspective and knowledge and concern with species diversity. Society and Natural Resources 17: 517532.
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Konteleon, A. & Swanson, T. (2003) The willingness to pay for property rights for the giant panda: can a charismatic species be an instrument for nature conservation? Land Economics 79: 483499.
Kotler, P. (2003) Principles of Marketing. Sydney, Australia: Prentice Hall.
Lambeck, R.J. (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11: 849856.
Leader-Williams, N. & Dublin, H.T. (2000) Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In: Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda had its Day? ed. Entwistle, A.C. & Dunstone, N., pp. 5381. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Linnell, J.D.C., Swenson, J.E. & Andersen, R. (2000) Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones? Biodiversity and Conservation 9: 857868.
Lorimer, J. (2006) Nonhuman charisma: which species trigger our emotions and why? ECOS 27: 2027.
Louviere, J., Hensher, D. & Swait, J. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Meffe, G.K., Carroll, C.R., & Contributors (1997) Principles of Conservation Biology. Second edition. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: Sinauer Associates.
Nentwig, W., Bacher, S., Beierkunlein, C., Brandl, R. & Grabherr, G. (2004) Ökologie [Ecology]. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Orme, B. (2006) Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Research Publishers LLC.
Peterson, R.O. (1988) The pit or the pendulum: issues in large carnivore management in natural ecosystems. In: Ecosystem Management for Parks and Wilderness, ed. Agee, J.K. & Johnson, D.R., pp. 105117. Seattle, USA: University of Washington Press.
Samways, M.J., Stork, N.E., Cracraft, J., Eeley, H.A.C., Foster, M., Lund, G. & Hilton-Taylor, C. (1995) Scales, planning and approaches to inventoring and monitoring. In: Global Biodiversity Assessment, ed. Heywood, V.H. & Watson, R.T., pp. 475517. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SCBD (2008) The 2010 Biodiversity Target [www document]: URL http://www.cbd.int/2010-target/
Simberloff, D. (1998) Flagship, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247257.
Stern, P. (2000) Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues 56: 407424.
Thirgood, S. & Redpath, S. (2008) Hen harriers and red grouse: science, politics and human-wildlife conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 15501554.
Walpole, M.J. & Leader-Williams, N. (2002) Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 543547.
White, P.C., Gregory, K.W., Lindley, P.J. & Richards, G. (1997) Economic values of threatened mammals in Britain: a case study of the otter Lutra lutra and the water vole Arvicola terrestris. Biological Conservation 82: 345354.

Keywords

Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations

  • ROBERT HOME (a1), CLAUDIA KELLER (a1) (a2), PETER NAGEL (a2), NICOLE BAUER (a1) and MARCEL HUNZIKER (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed