Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:09:39.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is enhanced tourism a reasonable expectation for transboundary conservation? An evaluation of the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2009

NOAH C. SCOVRONICK*
Affiliation:
Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa
JANE K. TURPIE
Affiliation:
Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa
*
*Correspondence: Noah Scovronick, 33 Sergeant Street, Princeton, NJ08540, USA e-mail: scovro@yahoo.com

Summary

The transnational nature of biodiversity provides impetus for transboundary protected areas, however support for these also stems from expectations of political, social or economic benefits. The sociopolitical context of southern Africa makes conservation initiatives incorporating economic development particularly appealing, and supporters of transboundary conservation advance visions of tourism growth in this regard; however, this assertion has not been objectively assessed. The Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, straddling South Africa and Botswana, is Africa's oldest formally recognized transfrontier park and widely viewed as the prototype for regional transboundary conservation. This paper examines visitation data combined with results from a visitor survey to indicate the tourism performance of the Park. Visitor numbers to the Park have not grown since its opening, but average length of stay and total visitor days have increased. However, it appears that this increase is primarily due to growth in bed numbers; the survey indicates that the Park's new features are only modestly used, and fewer than 10% of guests visit the adjacent country. Potential barriers to further growth include road conditions, Park size and homogeneity, and a lack of innovative tourism strategies. The need to expand socioeconomic monitoring of transboundary conservation areas in order to ensure their viability is reaffirmed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilateral Agreement (1999) Bilateral agreement between the government of the Republic of Botswana and the government of the Republic of South Africa on the recognition of the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. Signed 7 April 1999 [www document] URL http://www.tbpa.net/docs/treaties_MOUs/KgalagadiAgreement.pdfGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, B. (1999) Peace Parks: The Way Ahead. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Hanks, J. (2003) Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TBPAs) in Southern Africa: their role in conserving biodiversity, socioeconomic development and promoting a culture of peace. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17: 127148.Google Scholar
Lysenko, I., Besancon, C. & Savy, C. (2007) Global list of transboundary protected areas. UNEP-WCMC [www document]. URL http://www.tbpa.net/docs/pdfs/2007_UNEP-WCMC_Global_List_of_Transboundary_Protected%20Areas.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mills, G. & Haagner, C.. (1989) Guide to the Kalahari Gemsbok National Park. Johannesburg, South Africa: Southern Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C.G., Kormos, C., Sandwith, T. & Besancon, C. (2005) Transboundary Conservation: A New Vision for Protected Areas. Mexico City, Mexico: CEMEX/Conservation International.Google Scholar
Murphree, M.W. (2004) Who and what are parks for in transitional societies? In: Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line, ed. Child, B., pp. 217231. South Africa: IUCN.Google Scholar
Ramutsindela, M. (2004) Globalisation and nature conservation strategies in 21st century Southern Africa. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95: 6172.Google Scholar
Sandwith, T., Shine, C., Hamilton, L. & Sheppard, D. (2001) Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation. Report. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: xi + 111 pp.Google Scholar
Sandwith, T. & Besancon, C. (2005) Trade-offs among multiple goals for transboundary conservation. Draft paper presented at Environmental Change and Security Program Symposium: Parks for Peace or Peace for Parks? Issues in Practice and Policy. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC, USA [www document] URL http://www.wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/Besancon_Sandwith.pdfGoogle Scholar
SANParks (2000) Annual Report 1999/2000. SANParks, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
SANParks (2004 a) Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park: Official Information Guide. Pretoria, South Africa: SANParks.Google Scholar
SANParks (2004 b) Annual Report 2004. SANParks, Pretoria, South Africa [www document]. URL http://www.sanparks.org/about/annual/2004.pdfGoogle Scholar
SANParks (2005) Annual Report 2004/2005. SANParks, Pretoria, South Africa [www document]. URL http://www.sanparks.org/about/annual/2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
South African Tourism (2007) 2006 Annual Tourism Report. South African Tourism, Sandton, South Africa [www document]. URL http://www.southafrica.net/satourism/research/reasearch.cfmGoogle Scholar
Statsoft (2008) Statistica 7. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.Google Scholar
Swatuk, L. (2005) Peace Parks in Southern Africa. Draft paper presented at Environmental Change and Security Program Symposium: Parks for Peace or Peace for Parks? Issues in Practice and Policy. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington DC, USA [www document]. URL http://www.wilsoncenter.org/events/docs/swatuk.pdfGoogle Scholar
Turpie, J.K., Lange, G.M., Martin, R., Davies, R. & Barnes, J.I. (2004) Economic value and financing of Namibia's protected areas. Report to UNDP: 121 pp.Google Scholar