Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens

  • Kobe De Pourcq (a1), Evert Thomas (a2), Marlene Elias (a3) and Patrick Van Damme (a1)

Summary

Natural resource-related conflicts between local communities and nation states can be extremely destructive. Worldwide, interest is growing in gaining a better understanding of why and how these conflicts originate, particularly in protected areas inhabited by local communities. The literature on local attitudes towards and perceptions of park conservation and park–people conflicts is quite extensive. Studies have examined the socioeconomic and geographical determinants of attitudes to protected areas. However, the role of such determinants in the experience of park–people conflicts has received considerably less attention. Drawing on 601 interviews with people living in or near 15 Colombian national protected areas (NPAs), we examine the socioeconomic and geographical variables that are most influential in people’s experience of conflict related to restricted access to natural resources. We find that the experience of this type of conflict is largely explained by the NPA where a person resides, pursuit of productive activities within the NPA, previous employment in NPA administration, gender and ethnicity. We recommend implementing socially inclusive conservation strategies for conflict prevention and resolution in Colombia’s NPAs, whereby both women and men from different ethnic groups are engaged in design and implementation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Dr Kobe De Pourcq, Email: kobedepourcq@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Adams, W, Aveling, R, Brockington, D, Dickson, B, Elliott, J, Hutton, J et al. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 11461149.
Allendorf, T, Allendorf, K (2012) The role of gender in park–people relationships in Nepal. Human Ecology 40: 789796.
Andam, K, Ferraro, P, Pfaff, A, Sanchez-Azofeifa, G, Robalino, J (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 1608916094.
Arjunan, M, Holmes, C, Puyravaud, J, Davidar, P (2006) Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 188197.
Baral, N, Heinen, J (2007) Resources use, conservation attitudes, management intervention and park–people relations in the Western Terai landscape of Nepal. Environmental Conservation 34: 6472.
Barton, K (2018). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.40.4. URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bitanyi, S, Nesje, L, Kusiluka, S, Chenyambuga, P, Kaltenborn, B (2012) Awareness and perceptions of local people about wildlife hunting in western Serengeti communities. Tropical Conservation Science 5: 208224.
Bocarejo, D (2011) Dos paradojas del multiculturalismo colombiano: la espacialización de la diferencia indígena y su aislamiento político. Revista Colombiana de Antropologia 47: 97121.
Bragagnolo, C, Malhado, A, Jepson, P, Ladle, R (2016) Modelling local attitudes to protected areas in developing countries. Conservation and Society 14: 163182.
Brockington, D (2002) Fortress Conservation. The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford, UK: James Currey.
Deere, C, Leon, M (2003) The gender asset gap: land in Latin America. World Development 31: 925947.
De Pourcq, K, Thomas, E, Arts, B, Vranckx, A, Léon-Sicard, T, Van Damme, P (2015) Conflict in protected areas: who says co-management does not work? PLoS One 10(12): e0144943.
De Pourcq, K, Thomas, E, Arts, B, Vranckx, A, Léon-Sicard, T, Van Damme, P (2017) Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Development 93: 125135.
Duran, C (2009) Gobernanza en los Parques nacionales naturales colombianos. Revista de Estudios Sociales 32: 6072.
Glasl, F (1999) Confronting Conflict. A First Aid Kit for Handling Conflict. Bristol, UK: Hawthorne Press.
Howard, P (2003) Women and the plant world: an exploration. In: Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management and Conservation, ed. P Howard, pp. 147. London, UK: Zed Books.
Larson, L, Conway, A, Hernandez, S, Carroll, J (2016) Human–wildlife conflict, conservation attitudes, and a potential role for citizen science in Sierra Leone, Africa. Conservation and Society 14: 205.
Leach, M, Mearns, R, Scoones, I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27: 225247.
Lele, S, Wilshusen, P, Brockington, D, Seidler, R, Bawa, K (2010) Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 94100.
Marfo, E, Schanz, H (2009) Managing logging compensation payment conflicts in Ghana: understanding actor-empowerment and implications for policy intervention. Land Use Policy 26: 619629.
MAVDT (1977) Decreto 622 de Marzo 16 de 1977. “Por el Cual se Reglamenta Parcialmente: El Capitulo V Titulo II Parte XIII del Decreto Ley 2811 de 1974 sobre Sistema de Parques Nacionales, la Ley 23 de 1973. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Ambiente Vivienda y Desarollo Territorial.
MAVDT (2009) Resolución 2079 de Octubre 27 de 2009. Por Medio de la Cual se Declara, Reserva, Delimita y Alindera el Parque Nacional Natural Yaigojé Apaporis. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Ambiente Vivienda y Desarollo Territorial.
MAVDT (2010) Resolución 1501 de 04 de Agosto de 2010. Por Medio de la Cual se Declara, Reserva, Delimita y Alindera el Parque Nacional Natural Uramba Bahía Málaga. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Ambiente Vivienda y Desarollo Territorial.
Nolte, C (2016) Identifying challenges to enforcement in protected areas: empirical insights from 15 Colombian parks. Oryx 50: 317322.
Ojeda, D (2012) Green pretexts: ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 357375.
Pélissier, P (1980) L’arbre en Afrique tropical: la fonction et le signe. Cahiers de l’ORSTOM, Série Sciences Humaines 17: 127130.
Pomeroy, R, Katon, B, Harkes, I (2001) Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia. Marine Policy 25: 197208.
Schroeder, R (2002) Shady practices: agroforestry and gender politics in the Gambia. Political Geography 21: 845847.
Suarez, A, Árias-Arévalo, P, Martinez-Mera, E (2018) Environmental sustainability in post-conflict countries: insights for rural Colombia. Environment, Development and Sustainability 20: 9971015.
UAESPNN (2007) Bases Técnicas y Legales de la Política de Participación Social en la Conservación. Bogotá, Colombia: Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A.
UAESPNN (2012) Numero de Predios y Habitantes el los Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Unidad Administrativa Especial Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales.
UAESPNN (2017) Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales.
Vergara-Asenjo, G, Potvin, C (2014) Forest protection and tenure status: the key role of indigenous peoples and protected areas in Panama. Global Environmental Change 28: 205215.
West, P, Igoe, J, Brockington, D (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251277.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

De Pourcq et al. supplementary material
De Pourcq et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (51 KB)
51 KB

Exploring Park–People Conflicts in Colombia through a Social Lens

  • Kobe De Pourcq (a1), Evert Thomas (a2), Marlene Elias (a3) and Patrick Van Damme (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed