Anderson, K, Gaston, KJ (2013) Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 138–146.
Arona, L, Dale, J, Heaslip, SG, Hammill, MO, Johnston, DW (2018) Assessing the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada. PeerJ 6: e4467.
Barnas, AF, Felege, CJ, Rockwell, RF, Ellis-Felege, SN (2018a) A pilot(less) study on the use of an unmanned aircraft system for studying polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Polar Biology 41: 1055–1062.
Barnas, AF, Newman, R, Felege, CJ, Corcoran, MP, Hervey, SD, Stechmann, TJ, Rockwell, RF, Ellis-Felege, SN (2018b) Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys. Ecology and Evolution 8: 1328–1338.
Bevan, E, Wibbels, T, Najera, BMZ, Martinez, MAC, Martinez, LAS, Martinez, FI, Cuevas, JM, Anderson, T, Bonka, A, Hernandez, MH, Pena, LJ, Burchfield, PM (2015) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for monitoring sea turtles in near-shore waters. Marine Turtle Newsletter 145: 19–22.
Brisson-Curadeau, É, Bird, D, Burke, C, Fifield, DA, Pace, P, Sherley, RB, Elliott, KH (2017) Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census. Scientific Reports 7: 17884.
Chabot, D, Bird, DM (2012) Evaluation of an off-the-shelf unmanned aircraft system for surveying flocks of geese. Waterbirds 35: 170–174.
Chabot, D, Craik, SR, Bird, DM (2015) Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. PLoS ONE 10: e0122588.
Christie, KS, Gilbert, SL, Brown, CL, Hatfield, M, Hanson, L (2016) Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 241–251.
Canal, D, Negro, JJ (2018) Use of drones for research and conservation of birds of prey. In: Birds of Prey, pp. 325–337. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ditmer, MA, Vincent, JB, Werden, LK, Tanner, JC, Laske, TG, Iaizzo, PA, Garshelis, DL, Fieberg, JR (2015) Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles. Current Biology 25: 2278–2283.
Dolbeer, RA (2006) Height distribution of birds recorded by collisions with civil aircraft. Journal of Wildlife Management 70: 1345–1350.
Drever, MC, Chabot, D, O’Hara, PD, Thomas, JD, Breault, A, Millikin, RL (2015) Evaluation of an unmanned rotorcraft to monitor wintering waterbirds and coastal habitats in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 256–267.
Dulava, S, Bean, WT, Richmond, OMW (2015) Environmental reviews and case studies: applications of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for waterbird surveys. Environmental Practice 17: 201–210.
Durban, JW, Fearnbach, H, Perryman, WL, Leroi, DJ (2015) Photogrammetry of killer whales using a small hexacopter launched at sea. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 1–5.
Dylewski, L, Mikula, P, Tryjanowski, P, Morelli, F, Yosef, R (2017). Social media and scientific research are complementary – YouTube and shrikes as a case study. The Science of Nature 104: 48.
Giones, F, Brem, A (2017) From toys to tools: the co-evolution of technological and entrepreneurial developments in the drone industry. Business Horizons 60: 875–884.
Goebel, ME, Perryman, WL, Hinke, JT, Krause, DJ, Hann, NA, Gardner, S, LeRoi, DJ (2015) A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biology 38: 619–630.
Hahn, N, Mwakatobe, A, Konuche, J, De Souza, N, Keyyu, J, Goss, M, Chang’A, A, Palminteri, S, Dinerstein, E, Olson, D (2017) Unmanned aerial vehicles mitigate human–elephant conflict on the borders of Tanzanian Parks: a case study. Oryx 51: 513–516.
Hanson, L, Holmquist-johnson, CL, Cowardin, ML (2014) Evaluation of the Raven sUAS to Detect and Monitor Greater Sage-Grouse Leks within the Middle Park Population. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014–1205. Reston, VA, USA: US Geological Survey.
Hayes, B, Jones, C, Töpferm, E (2014) Eurodrones Inc. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Transnational Institute (TNI).
Hodgson, JC, Koh, LP (2016) Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research. Current Biology 26: R404–R405.
Hu, J, Wu, X, Dai, M (2018) Estimating the population size of migrating Tibetan antelopes Pantholops hodgsonii with unmanned aerial vehicles. Oryx 1–9.
Jiménez López, J, Mulero-Pázmány, M (2019) Drones for conservation in protected areas: present and future. Drones 3: 10.
Junda, JH, Greene, E, Zazelenchuk, D, Bird, DM (2016) Nest defense behaviour of four raptor species (osprey, bald eagle, ferruginous hawk and red-tailed hawk) to a novel aerial intruder – a small rotary-winged drone. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 1–22.
Knight, RL, Gutzwiller, KJ, eds. (2013) Wildlife and Recreationists: Coexistence through Management and Research. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Korczak-Abshire, M, Kidawa, A, Zmarz, A, Storvold, R, Karlsen, SR, Rodzewicz, M, Chwedorzewska, K, Znój, A (2016) Preliminary study on nesting Adélie penguins disturbance by unmanned aerial vehicles. CCAMLR Science 23: 1–16.
Koski, WR, Gamage, G, Davis, AR, Mathews, T, LeBlanc, B, Ferguson, SH (2015) Evaluation of UAS for photographic re-identification of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus
. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 22–29.
Lambertucci, SA, Shepard, ELC, Wilson, R (2015) Human–wildlife conflicts in a crowded airspace. Science 348: 502–504.
Lyons, M, Brandis, K, Callaghan, C, McCann, J, Mills, C, Ryall, S, Kingsford, R (2018) Bird interactions with drones, from individuals to large colonies. Australian Field Ornithology 35: 51–56.
McClelland, GTW, Bond, AL, Sardana, A, Glass, T (2016) Rapid population estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle. Marine Ornitholog 44: 215–220.
McEvoy, JF, Hall, GP, McDonald, PG (2016) Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4: e1831.
McIntosh, RR, Holmberg, R, Dann, P (2018) Looking without landing – using remote piloted aircraft to monitor fur seal populations without disturbance. Frontiers in Marine Science 5: 202.
Moreland, EE, Cameron, MF, Angliss, RP, Boveng, PL (2015) Evaluation of a ship-based unoccupied aircraft system (UAS) for surveys of spotted and ribbon seals in the Bering Sea pack ice. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 114–122.
Mulero-Pázmány, M, Jenni-Eiermann, S, Strebel, N, Sattler, T, Negro, JJ, Tablado, Z (2017) Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12: e0178448.
Mulero-Pázmány, M, Stolper, R, Van Essen, LD, Negro, JJ, Sassen, T (2014) Remotely piloted aircraft systems as a rhinoceros anti-poaching tool in Africa. PLoS ONE 9: e83873.
Pomeroy, P, O’Connor, L, Davies, P (2015) Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 102–113.
Rümmler, MC, Mustafa, O, Maercker, J, Peter, HU, Esefeld, J (2016) Measuring the influence of unmanned aerial vehicles on Adélie penguins. Polar Biology 39: 1329–1334.
Sandbrook, C (2015) The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 44: 636–647.
Sardà-Palomera, F, Bota, G, Viñolo, C, Pallarés, O, Sazatornil, V, Brotons, L, Gomáriz, S, Sardà, F (2012) Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems. IBIS 154: 177–183.
Smith, CE, Sykora-Bodie, ST, Bloodworth, B, Pack, SM, Spradlin, TR, LeBoeuf, NR (2016) Assessment of known impacts of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) on marine mammals: data gaps and recommendations for researchers in the United States. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 31–44.
Taylor, AR, Knight, RL (2003) Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecological Applications 13: 951–963.
Vas, E, Lescroël, A, Duriez, O, Boguszewski, G, Grémillet, D (2015) Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters 11: 20140754.
Vermeulen, C, Lejeune, P, Lisein, J, Sawadogo, P, Bouché, P (2013) Unmanned aerial survey of elephants. PLoS ONE 8: e54700.
Weimerskirch, H, Prudor, A, Schull, Q (2018) Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses. Polar Biology 41: 259–266.
Weissensteiner, MH, Poelstra, JW, Wolf, JBW (2015) Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 46: 425–430.