Skip to main content Accessibility help

A Computer-based Method of Wilderness Evaluation

  • Robert G. Lesslie (a1), Brendan G. Mackey (a1) and Kathryn M. Preece (a2)


With ever-increasing demands being made on remote and natural lands, planners and managers require more detailed information than hitherto to assist them in monitoring the status of this wilderness resource and developing appropriate and effective management prescriptions. These requirements are addressed by a computer-based wilderness evaluation procedure that has been developed for a national wilderness survey of Australia.

The methodology, based on the wilderness continuum concept (Lesslie & Taylor, 1985), places emphasis on measuring variation in wilderness quality by using four indicators that represent the two essential attributes of remoteness and naturalness. This permits a precise assessment to be made of the wilderness resource, revealing those factors which contribute to or compromise wilderness quality. The computer-based storage and analysis of data enables surveys to be conducted over large, even continental, areas, yet at a relatively fine level of resolution that is appropriate to localized planning needs.

Trial application to the State of Victoria, Australia, demonstrates that the survey procedure can be successfully adapted to a wide range of environments, use-patterns, data-base characteristics, and management objectives, which should be applicable and very widely useful elsewhere.



Hide All
Australia, Committee of Inquiry into the National Estate (1974). Report of the National Estate. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra ACT, Australia: 415 pp., illustr.
Australia, Council of Nature Conservation Ministers (1986). Identification and Management of Wilderness Areas in Australia: A Report by the CONCOM Working Group on Management of National Parks. Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Canberra ACT, Australia: 7 pp.
Feller, M., Hooley, D., Dreher, T., East, I. & Jung, R. (1979). Wilderness in Victoria: An Inventory. Monash University Geography Department, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: ix + 84 pp., illustr.
Hawes, M. & Heatley, D. (1985). Wilderness Assessment and Management. The Wilderness Society, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia: 31 pp., illustr.
Helman, P.M., Jones, A.D., Pigram, J.J. & Smith, J.M. (1976). Wilderness in Australia: Eastern New South Wales and South-eastern Queensland. University of New England Geography Department, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia: 147 pp., illustr.
Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1979). Hydroelectric Development and Wilderness in Tasmania. Tasmania Department of the Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia: 31 pp., illustr.
Kirkpatrick, J.B. & Haney, R.A. (1980). The quantification of developmental wilderness loss. Search, 11, pp. 331–5, illustr.
Lesslie, R.G. & Taylor, S.G. (1983). Wilderness in South Australia: An inventory of the State's relatively high-quality wilderness areas. Occ. Pap. University of Adelaide, Centre for Environmental Studies, 1, 87 pp., illustr.
Lesslie, R.G. & Taylor, S.G. (1985). The wilderness continuum concept and its implications for wilderness preservation policy. Biological Conservation, 32, pp. 309–33, illustr.
Lesslie, R.G., Mackey, B.G. & Preece, K.M. (1987). A Computer-based Methodology for the Survey of Wilderness in A ustralia. Unpublished report to the Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra ACT, Australia: 41 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).
Messer, J. & Mosley, J.G. (1980). The Value of National Parks to the Community. Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: 223 pp., illustr.
Preece, K.M. & Lesslie, R.G. (1987). A Survey of Wilderness Quality in Victoria. Ministry for Planning and Environment, Victoria, and Australian Heritage Commission, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: viii + 67 pp., illustr.
Russell, J.A., Matthews, J.H. & Jones, R. (1979). Wilderness in Tasmania. Occ. Pap. University of Tasmania, Centre for Environmental Studies, 10, 103 pp., illustr.

A Computer-based Method of Wilderness Evaluation

  • Robert G. Lesslie (a1), Brendan G. Mackey (a1) and Kathryn M. Preece (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed