Skip to main content Accessibility help

Comparison of local knowledge and researcher-led observations for wildlife exploitation assessment and management

  • Andrew J Temple (a1), Selina M Stead (a1) (a2), Edward Hind-Ozan (a3), Narriman Jiddawi (a4) (a5) and Per Berggren (a1)...


The use of local knowledge observations to generate empirical wildlife resource exploitation data in data-poor, capacity-limited settings is increasing. Yet, there are few studies quantitatively examining their relationship with those made by researchers or natural resource managers. We present a case study comparing intra-annual patterns in effort and mobulid ray (Mobula spp.) catches derived from local knowledge and fisheries landings data at identical spatiotemporal scales in Zanzibar (Tanzania). The Bland–Altman approach to method comparison was used to quantify agreement, bias and precision between methods. Observations from the local knowledge of fishers and those led by researchers showed significant evidence of agreement, demonstrating the potential for local knowledge to act as a proxy, or complement, for researcher-led methods in assessing intra-annual patterns of wildlife resource exploitation. However, there was evidence of bias and low precision between methods, undermining any assumptions of equivalency. Our results underline the importance of considering bias and precision between methods as opposed to simply assessing agreement, as is commonplace in the literature. This case study demonstrates the value of rigorous method comparison in informing the appropriate use of outputs from different knowledge sources, thus facilitating the sustainable management of wildlife resources and the livelihoods of those reliant upon them.


Corresponding author

Correspondence to: Dr Andrew J Temple, Email:


Hide All
Alfaro-Shigueto, J, Mangel, JC, Darquea, J, Donoso, M, Baquero, A, Doherty, PD, Godley, BJ (2018) Untangling the impacts of nets in the southeastern Pacific: rapid assessment of marine turtle bycatch to set conservation priorities in small-scale fisheries. Fisheries Research 206: 185192.
Anadón, JD, Giménez, A, Ballestar, R, Pérez, I (2009) Evaluation of local ecological knowledge as a method for collecting extensive data on animal abundance. Conservation Biology 23: 617625.
Bland, JM, Altman, DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8: 135160.
Bland, JM, Altman, DG (2003) Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 22: 8593.
Carkeet, A, Goh, YT (2018) Confidence and coverage for Bland–Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 27: 15591574.
Croll, DA, Dewar, H, Dulvy, NK, Fernando, D, Francis, MP, Galván-Magaña, Fet al. (2016) Vulnerabilities and fisheries impacts: the uncertain future of manta and devil rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 26: 562575.
Daw, TM, Robinson, JAN, Graham, NAJ (2011) Perceptions of trends in Seychelles artisanal trap fisheries: comparing catch monitoring, underwater visual census and fishers’ knowledge. Environmental Conservation 38: 7588.
Fischer, J (2000) Participatory research in ecological fieldwork: a Nicaraguan study. In: Finding Our Sea Legs: Linking Fishery People and Their Knowledge with Science and Management, eds Neis, B, Felt, L, pp. 4154. St. John’s, NL, Canada: ISER Books.
Foucault, M, Ewald, F (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. London, UK: Macmillan.
Griffin, L (2009) Scales of knowledge: North Sea fisheries governance, the local fisherman and the European scientist. Environmental Politics 18: 557575.
Haas, PM (1989) Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization 43: 377403.
Hind, EJ (2012) Last of the Hunters or the Next Scientists? Arguments For and Against the Inclusion of Fishers and Their Knowledge in Mainstream Fisheries Management. Doctoral thesis, National University of Ireland, Galway.
Hind, EJ (2015) A review of the past, the present, and the future of fishers’ knowledge research: a challenge to established fisheries science. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72: 341358.
Hirst, W, Phelps, EA, Buckner, RL, Budson, AE, Cuc, A, Gabrieli, JDEet al. (2009) Long-term memory for the terrorist attack of September 11: flashbulb memories, event memories, and the factors that influence their retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138: 161176.
Jennings, S, Polunin, NVC (1995) Biased underwater visual census biomass estimates for target-species in tropical reef fisheries. Journal of Fish Biology 47: 733736.
Jentoft, S (2005) Fisheries co-management as empowerment. Marine Policy 29: 17.
Johannes, RE, Freeman, MMR, Hamilton, RJ (2000) Ignore fishers’ knowledge and miss the boat. Fish and Fisheries 1: 257271.
Knapman, P (2005) Participatory governance in inshore fisheries co-management in England and Wales. In: Participation in Fisheries Governance, ed. Gray, TS, pp. 163178. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Matlin, MW (2004) Cognition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.
Moore, JE, Cox, TM, Lewison, RL, Read, AJ, Bjorkland, R, McDonald, SLet al. (2010) An interview-based approach to assess marine mammal and sea turtle captures in artisanal fisheries. Biological Conservation 143: 795805.
Murray, GD, Neis, B, Palmer, CT, Schneider, D (2008) Mapping cod: fisheries science, fish harvesters’ ecological knowledge and cod migrations in the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Human Ecology 36: 581598.
Neis, B, Schneider, DC, Felt, L, Haedrich, RL, Fischer, J, Hutchings, JA (1999) Fisheries assessment: what can be learned from interviewing resource users? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 19491963.
O’Donnell, KP, Molloy, PP, Vincent, ACJ (2012) Comparing fisher interviews, logbooks, and catch landings estimates of extraction rates in a small-scale fishery. Coastal Management 40: 594611.
Peterson, AM, Stead, SM (2011) Rule breaking and livelihood options in marine protected areas. Environmental Conservation 38: 342352.
Pilcher, NJ, Adulyanukosol, K, Das, H, Davis, P, Hines, E, Kwan, Det al. (2017) A low-cost solution for documenting distribution and abundance of endangered marine fauna and impacts from fisheries. PLoS ONE 12: e0190021.
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rist, J, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Cowlishaw, GUY, Rowcliffe, M (2010) Hunter reporting of catch per unit effort as a monitoring tool in a bushmeat-harvesting system. Conservation Biology 24: 489499.
Rozwadowski, HM (2002) The Sea Knows No Boundaries: A Century of Marine Science under ICES. Seattle, WA, USA: University of Washington Press and New York, NY, USA: University of Columbia Press.
Slater, MJ, Napigkit, FA, Stead, SM (2013) Resource perception, livelihood choices and fishery exit in a Coastal Resource Management area. Ocean & Coastal Management 71: 326333.
Soto, CG (2006) Socio-cultural Barriers to Applying Fishers’ Knowledge in Fisheries Management: An Evaluation of Literature Cases. Doctoral thesis, School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University.
Stead, S, Daw, T, Gray, T (2006). Uses of fishers’ knowledge in fisheries management. Anthropology in Action 13: 7786.
Stephenson, RL, Paul, S, Pastoors, MA, Kraan, M, Holm, P, Wiber, Met al. (2016) Integrating fishers’ knowledge research in science and management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 73: 14591465.
Temple, AJ, Wambiji, N, Poonian, CNS, Jiddawi, N, Stead, SM, Kiszka, JJ, Berggren, P (2019) Marine megafauna catch in southwestern Indian Ocean small-scale fisheries from landings data. Biological Conservation 230: 113121.
Thurstan, RH, Roberts, CM (2010) Ecological meltdown in the Firth of Clyde, Scotland: two centuries of change in a coastal marine ecosystem. PLoS ONE 5: e11767.
Wanyonyi, IN, Wamukota, A, Mesaki, S, Guissamulo, AT, Ochiewo, J (2016) Artisanal fisher migration patterns in coastal East Africa. Ocean & Coastal Management 119: 93108.
Weale, A (1992) The New Politics of Pollution. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.


Comparison of local knowledge and researcher-led observations for wildlife exploitation assessment and management

  • Andrew J Temple (a1), Selina M Stead (a1) (a2), Edward Hind-Ozan (a3), Narriman Jiddawi (a4) (a5) and Per Berggren (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.