Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms

  • Monica Garcia-Alonso (a1), Erik Jacobs (a2), Alan Raybould (a1), Thomas E. Nickson (a3), Peter Sowig (a4), Hilde Willekens (a5), Pier Van Der Kouwe (a6), Raymond Layton (a7), Firoz Amijee (a8), Angel M. Fuentes (a8) and Francesca Tencalla (a2)...

Abstract

Representatives of the developers of modern agricultural biotechnology are proposing a tiered approach for conducting non-target organism risk assessment for genetically modified (GM) plants in Europe. The approach was developed by the Technical Advisory Group of the EuropaBio Plant Biotechnology Unit (http://www.europabio.org/TAG.htm) and complements other international activities to harmonize risk assessment. In the European Union (EU), the principles and methods to be followed in an environmental risk assessment for the placing on the market of GM plants are laid out in Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs, Commission Decision 2002/623/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003. Additional information is provided in the European Food Safety Authority guidance document of 2004. However, risk assessment for effects to non-target organisms could benefit from further clarification and remains the subject of much discussion in Europe. The industry-wide approach developed by EuropaBio is based on the fundamental steps of risk evaluation, namely hazard and exposure assessment. It follows a structured scheme including assessment planning, product characterization and assessment of hazard/exposure (Tier 0), single high dose and dose response testing (Tier 1), refined hazard characterization and exposure assessment (Tier 2) and further refined risk assessment experiments (Tier 3). An additional tier (Tier 4) was included to reflect the fact that post-market activities such as monitoring are required under Directive 2001/18/EC. The approach is compatible with conditions of commercial release in the EU and around the world.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
[1] Andow, D and Zwahlen C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol. Lett. 9: 196214
[2] Barret KL, Grandy N, Harrison EG, Hassan S, Oomen P (1994) Guidance document on regulatory testing procedures for pesticides with non-target arthropods. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) – Europe. From the European Standard Characteristics of Beneficials Regulatory Testing (ESCORT I) Workshop, March 1994
[3] BSP (2000) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.biodiv.org/biosafety/protocol.asp
[4] Calow P (1998) Handbook of Environmental Risk Assessment and Management. In Calow P, ed, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK
[5] Candolfi M, Barret KL, Campbell PJ, Forster N, Grandy N, Huet MC, Lewis G, Oomen PA, Schmuck R, Vogt H (2000) Guidance document on regulatory testing and risk assessment procedures for plant protection products with non-target arthropods. From the European standard characteristics of non-target arthropod regulatory testing (ESCORT II) Workshop, March 2000
[6] Commission Decision 2002/623/EC of 24 July 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 200/22–33 (30.7.2002)
[7] Council Decision 2002/811/EC of 3 October 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 280/27–36 (18.10.2002)
[8] Directive 2001/18/EC of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 106/1–38 (17.4.2001)
[9] Dutton, A, Romeis, J, Bigler, F (2003) Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study. BioControl 48: 611636
[10] EC (2000) Report of the Scientific Steering Committee’s Working Group on Harmonisation of Risk Assessment Procedures in the Scientific Committees advising the European Commission in the area of human and environmental health – 26–27 October 2000. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/ssc/out83_en.pdf
[11] EFSA (2004) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. The EFSA Journal 99: 194
[12] Marvier, M (2002) Improving risk assessment for non-target safety of transgenic crops. Ecol. Applications 12: 1119– 1124
[13] Newman NC (1998) In Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI
[14] Nickson T, McKee M (2002) Ecological assessment of crops derived through biotechnology. In Biotechnology and Safety Assessment, 3rd edition, Thomas J.A. and Fuchs R.L., eds, Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 233–252
[15] OECD (1993a) Safety considerations for biotechnology: scale-up of crop plants. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/26/26/1958527.pdf ?channelId=34537&homeChannelId=33703&fileTitle=Safety+Considerations+for+Biotechnology+Scale-up+of+Crop+Plants
[16] OECD (1993b) Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology: concept and principles. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/3/1946129.pdf ?channelId=34537& homeChannelId=33703&fileTitle=Safety+Evaluation+of+Foods+Derived+by+Modern+Biotechnology+-+Concepts+and+Principles
[17] Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Communities L 268/1–23 (18.10.2003)
[18] Rose, RI (2006) Tier-based testing for potential effects of proteinaceous insecticidal plant-incorporated protectants on non-target arthropods in the context of regulatory risk assessments. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 29: 145152
[19] Schuler, T, Poppy, GM, Denholm, I (2000) Recommendations for assessing effects of GM crops on non-target organisms. British Crop Protection Council Conference: Pest and Diseases 3: 12211228
[20] US EPA (1998) Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC, 175 pp. http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimsapi.dispdetail?deid=12460
[21] US EPA (1999) Draft ECOFRAM Aquatic Report. P. Hendley and J. Giddings, eds. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/ecorisk/aquareport.pdf
[22] US EPA (2001) Biopesticides Registration Action Document – Bacillus thuringiensis Plant Incorporated Protectants. http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/pips/bt_brad.htm
[23] Van Leuven CJ (1996) In Risk Assessment of Chemicals: An Introduction
[24] WHO/FAO (2000) Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology, 29. http://www.fao.org/es/ESN/food/pdf/gmreport.pdf
[25] Wilkinson MJ, Sweet JB, Poppy G (2003) Preventing the regulatory log jam; the tiered approach to risk assessments. Trends Plant Sci. 8: 208–212

Keywords

A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms

  • Monica Garcia-Alonso (a1), Erik Jacobs (a2), Alan Raybould (a1), Thomas E. Nickson (a3), Peter Sowig (a4), Hilde Willekens (a5), Pier Van Der Kouwe (a6), Raymond Layton (a7), Firoz Amijee (a8), Angel M. Fuentes (a8) and Francesca Tencalla (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed