Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops

  • Anna Lehrman (a1) and Katy Johnson (a2)

Abstract

This study evaluates a survey about Swedish farmers' attitude towards genetically modified (GM) crops, and their perception concerning potential benefits and drawbacks that cropping of an insect resistant (IR) GM variety would involve. The questions were “tick a box” choices, included in a yearly omnibus survey sent to 1000 Swedish farmers (68% response rate). The results showed that a majority of the farmers were negative, although almost one third claimed to be neutral to GM crops. The farmers recognized several benefits both in terms of agricultural production and for the environment, but they were also highly concerned about the consumers' unwillingness to buy GM products. Farmers perceived an increase in yield, but nearly as many farmers thought that there would be no benefits with growing an IR GM crop. Several differences in hopes and concerns of the farmers surveyed were revealed when they were divided in positive, neutral and negative groups. Farmers negative to GM were more concerned than positive farmers about IR GM crops being dangerous for humans, livestock or other organisms to consume. GM-positive farmers seemed to be most concerned about potential problems with growing a marketable crop and expensive seeds, but saw a reduced health risk to the grower, due to less use of pesticides, as a possible benefit. The results among the GM-neutral farmers were in most cases closely related to the positive farmers' choices, implying that they believe that there are advantages with growing an IR GM crop, but also fear potential drawbacks. This general uncertainty about GM IR crops may prevent them from accepting the new technology.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
[1] Anderson, JC, Wachenheim, CJ, Lesch, WC (2006) Perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods and processes. AgBioForum 9: 180194
[2] Brookes G (2007) The benefits of adopting genetically modified, insect resistant (Bt) maize in the European Union (EU): First results from 1998-2006 plantings: PG Economics Ltd
[3] Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006) GM Crops: The first ten years – Global socio-economic and environmental impacts. ISAAA Brief No 36
[4] Busch, L, Bonanno, A, Lacy, WB (1989) Science, technology, and the restructuring of agriculture. Sociol. Rural. 29: 118130
[5] Buttel FH, Larson OF, Gillespie GWJ (1990) The sociology of agriculture. New York, Greenwood Press
[6] Conner, AJ, Glare, TR, Nap, J-P (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J. 33: 1946
[7] Cook, AJ, Fairweather, JR (2003) New Zealand farmer and grower intentions to use gene technology: Results from a resurvey. AgBioForum 6: 120-127
[8] EU (2007) Organic Food: New Regulation to foster the further development of Europe's organic food sector. Press release http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/07/807&format=HTML&aged=0
[9] Fernadez-Cornejo J, Caswell M (2006) The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States, Economic information bulletin Number 11. United States Department of Agriculture
[10] Fjæstad B, Olofsson A, Öhman S (2003) Svenskarna och gentekniken – Rapport från 2002 års Europabarometer om bioteknik. Östersund: Mitthögskolan
[11] Frewer, LJ, Howard, C, Aaron, JI (1998) Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pestic. Sci. 52: 388393
[12] Gaskell, G, Allum, N, Bauer, M, Durant, J, Allansdottir, A, Bonfadelli, H, Boy, D, de Cheveigne, S, Fjæstad, B, Gutteling, JM, Hampel, J, Jelsoe, E, Jesuino, JC, Kohring, M, Kronberger, N, Midden, C, Nielsen, TH, Przestalski, A, Rusanen, T, Sakellaris, G, Torgersen, H, Twardowski, T, Wagner, W (2000) Biotechnology and the European public. Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 935938
[13] Gaskell G, Allansdottir A, Allum N, Corchero C, Fischler C, Hampel J, Jackson J, Kronberger N, Mejlgaard N, Revuelta G, Schreiner C, Stares S, Torgersen H, Wagner W (2006) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and trends. Eurobarometer 64.3. European Commission's Directorate-General for Research
[14] Gómez-Barbero M, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2006) Economic impact of dominant GM crops worldwide: a review. Luxembourg: European Commission
[15] Hornig Priest, S (2000) US public opinion divided over biotechnology? Nat. Biotech. 18: 939942
[16] James C (2006) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006. ISAAA Brief No. 35. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY
[17] Johnson, KL, Raybould, AF, Hudson, MD, Poppy, GM (2007) How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? Trends Plant Sci. 12: 15
[18] Koivisto Hursti, U-K, Magnusson, MK, Algers, A (2002) Swedish consumers' opinions about gene technology. Br. Food J. 104: 860872
[19] Krosnick JA (1990) Survey research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50: 537–567
[20] Magnusson, MK, Koivisto Hursti, U-K (2002) Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods. Appetite 39: 924
[21] Pilcher, CD, Rice, ME, Higgins, RA, Steffey, KL, Hellmich, RL, Witkowski, J, Calvin, D, Ostlie, KR, Gray, M (2002) Biotechnology and the European corn borer: Measuring historical farmer perceptions and adoption of transgenic Bt corn as a pest management strategy. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 878892
[22] Poortinga, W, Pidgeon, NF (2006) Exploring the structure of attitudes toward genetically modified food. Risk Anal. 26: 17071719
[23] Shelton, AM, Zhao, JZ, Roush, RT (2002) Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 845881
[24] SJV (2006) Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics: Swedish Board of Agriculture
[25] SOU (2007) Ansvarsfrågan vid odling av genmodifierade grödor. Betänkande av utredningen om ansvarsfrågan vid odling av genmodifierade grödor 2007:46. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet
[26] Sveriges Lantbruk (2003) http://abe.dynamicweb.dk/images/files/Landbrugsundersogelsen.pdf : BioteknikCentrum
[27] ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA
[28] Weaver, SA, Morris, MC (2005) Risks associated with genetic modification: an annotated bibliography of peer reviewed natural science publications. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 18: 157189
[29] Wilson, TA, Rice, ME, Tollefson, JJ, Pilcher, CD (2005) Transgenic corn for control of the European corn borer and corn rootworms: a survey of Midwestern farmers' practices and perceptions. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 237247

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops

  • Anna Lehrman (a1) and Katy Johnson (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.