Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize

  • Kerstin Schmidt (a1), Ralf Wilhelm (a2), Jörg Schmidtke (a1), Lutz Beißner (a2) (a3), Wenke Mönkemeyer (a1), Petra Böttinger (a2), Jeremy Sweet (a4) and Joachim Schiemann (a2)...

Abstract

Monitoring is a statutory requirement for the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops in the European Community. Questionnaires for farmers to report on observations of effects linked with the cultivation of GM crops can form a useful part of a monitoring regime. A questionnaire for GM maize (Zea mays L.) was designed, with questions focusing on potential effects related to the GM maize grown, as well as on background information about cultivation methods and on individual field situations. In this paper we present the methodological approach of the monitoring regime, the structuring of the data, and the contents and structure of the questionnaire. The statistical requirements and background for an appropriate evaluation and interpretation of the data are described. Results of interviews made from 2001 to 2005 are also presented. It is envisaged that this approach will be developed for monitoring other cultivated GM plants and traits, and may be applicable in monitoring certain non-farmed environments.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
[1] Bayer AG (1992) Important crops of the world and their weeds: their scientific names, synonyms and computer codes according to WSSA/WSSJ; Leverkusen
[2] Beißner L, Wilhelm R, Schiemann J (2006) Current research activities to develop and test questionnaires as a tool for the General Surveillance of important crop plants. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 95–97
[3] Berensmeier A, Schmidt K (2007) “Good Monitoring Practice” – Quality control measures for farm questionnaires. J. Verb. Lebensm. 2: 56–58
[4] Berensmeier, A, Schmidt, K, Beißner, L, Schiemann, J, Wilhelm, R (2006) Statistical analysis of farm questionnaires to search for differences between GM- and non-GM maize. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 8084
[5] Bund/Länder Arbeitsgruppe “Monitoring von Umweltwirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen” (2003) Konzept für das Monitoring gentechnisch veränderter Organismen (GVO), September 2002. In Monitoring von gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen: Instrument einer vorsorgenden Umweltpolitik, Texte 23/03, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin 2003, pp 169–209
[6] CADEMO for Windows 3.27 (2006) BioMath GmbH, Rostock, Germany
[7] DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (1999) Qualitätskriterien der Umfrageforschung (Quality criteria for survey research), Akademie Verlag, Berlin
[8] Diekmann A (2006) Empirische Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg
[9] EFSA (2006a) Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants and Derived Food and Feed. EFSA Journal 99: 194
[10] EFSA (2006b) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on the Post Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of Genetically Modified Plants. EFSA Journal 319: 127
[11] Meier (ed) (2001) Growth Stages of mono- and dicotyledonous Plants. BBCH Monograph., 2nd Edition, Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, publicy available under: http://www.jki.bund.de/cln_045/nn_805656/DE/veroeff/bbch/bbch__node.html__nnn=true
[12] Merkes, R, Coenen, H, Hesse, F, Schütz, G (2003) Stand der Produktionstechnik zu Zuckerrüben – Ergebnisse der Umfrage 2002. Zuckerindustrie 128: 425433
[13] Mönkemeyer W, Schmidt K, Beißner L, Schiemann J, Wilhelm R (2006) A critical examination of the potentials of existing German networks for GMO-monitoring. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 67–71
[14] Official Journal of the European Communities (17 April 2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC; L 106/1
[15] Official Journal of the European Communities (30 July 2002) Commission Decision of 24 July 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (notified under document number C (2002) 2715); L 200/22
[16] Official Journal of the European Communities (18 October 2002) Council Decision of 3 October 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex VII to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC; L 280/27
[17] Official Journal of the European Communities (18 October 2002) Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed; L 268/1
[18] Rasch D, Herrendörfer G, Bock J, Victor N, Guiard V (2007a) Verfahrensbibliothek Versuchsplanung und -auswertung. Oldenbourg Verlag, München
[19] Rasch D, Verdooren LR, Gowers JI (2007b) The Design and Analysis of Experiments and Surveys. Oldenbourg Verlag, München
[20] Sanvido O, Bigler F, Widmer F, Winzeler M (2004) Umweltmonitoring gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen in der Schweiz. Schriftenreihe der FAL / Les Cahiers de la FAL 51. Agroscope FAL Reckenholz (in German)
[21] Sanvido, O, Widmer, F, Winzeler, M, Bigler, F (2005) A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. Environ. Biosafety Res. 4: 1327
[22] Schiemann, J, Wilhelm, R, Beißner, L, Schmidtke, J, Schmidt, K (2006) Data acquisition by farm questionnaires and linkage to other sources of data. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 2629
[23] Schmidt, K, Schmidtke, J, Wilhelm, R, Beißner, L, Schiemann, J (2004) Biometrical analysis of farmers' questionnaires for the monitoring of the cultivation of genetically modified maize varieties – statistical evaluation of monitoring objectives. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 56: 206212 (in German)
[24] Schmidt K, Beißner L, Schiemann J, Wilhelm R (2006) Methodology and tools for data acquisition and statistical analysis. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 21–25
[25] Schmidtke J, Schmidt K (2006) Data management and data base implementation for GMO monitoring. J. Verb. Lebensm. 1: 92–94
[26] Schmidtke J, Schmidt K (2007) Use of existing networks for the General Surveillance of GMP? Proposal of a Reporting System and a Central Reporting Office. J. Verb. Lebensm. 2: 79–84
[27] Schneider B (2001) Methoden der Planung und Auswertung klinischer Studien. In Rasch D (Hrsg.), Anwendungen der Biometrie in Medizin, Landwirtschaft und Mikrobiologie, BioMath GmbH, Rostock
[28] SPSS for Windows, Rel. 10.1.3. 2001. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
[29] Wengraf T (2006) Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publ., London
[30] Wilhelm, R, Beißner, L, Schiemann, J (2002) Gestaltung des Monitoring der Auswirkungen gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen im Agrarökosystem. Gesunde Pflanzen 54: 194206 (in German)
[31] Wilhelm, R, Beißner, L, Schiemann, J (2003) Concept for the Realisation of a GMO Monitoring in Germany. Updated English version of “Konzept zur Umsetzung eines GVO-Monitoring in Deutschland”. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 55: 258272
[32] Wilhelm, R, Beißner, L, Schmidt, K, Schmidtke, J, Schiemann, J (2004) Monitoring of the cultivation of genetically modified plants – Use of farmers' questionnaires. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 56: 184188 (in German), with supplement: http://www.jki.bund.de/cln_045/nn_902382/SharedDocs/17__PS/Publikationen/arbgrmonit/questgmmaize040823.pdf.html

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize

  • Kerstin Schmidt (a1), Ralf Wilhelm (a2), Jörg Schmidtke (a1), Lutz Beißner (a2) (a3), Wenke Mönkemeyer (a1), Petra Böttinger (a2), Jeremy Sweet (a4) and Joachim Schiemann (a2)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.