Skip to main content Accessibility help

Social vulnerability in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management

  • Jarl Kind (a1), W. J. Wouter Botzen (a2) (a3) (a4) and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts (a2)


Traditional cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) of flood risk reduction measures usually ignore distributions of damages over populations, which disadvantages the poor. Instead, a CBA based on social welfare includes individual social vulnerability through relative impacts on consumption. If vulnerabilities are high, floods are catastrophic and cause poverty, migration or indirect deaths, and risk reductions have high social welfare values. For non-catastrophic risks, social welfare values of risks are relatively higher for vulnerable low-income households. We present a framework to integrate social vulnerability into CBAs, and show how financial protection reduces social flood vulnerability and provides welfare benefits. A case study illustrates that traditional CBAs underestimate the social welfare value of flood risk reduction measures, up to a factor of 30. Data on financial protection is however scarce, which hampers estimation of the social welfare value in practice. A solution is to increase financial protection of individuals, in addition to offering physical flood protection.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Adler, MD and Posner, EA (2006) New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anttila-Hughes, JK and Hsiang, SM (2013) Destruction, disinvestment, and death: economic and human losses following environmental disaster. SSRN Working Paper. Available at
Arrow, KJ and Lind, RC (1970) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. American Economic Review 60, 364378.
Boardman, A, Greenberg, D, Vining, AR and Weimer, DL (2014) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 4th Edn. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Chinh, DT, Bubeck, P, Dung, NV and Kreibich, H (2016) The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses. Disasters 40, 753778.
Cutter, SL, Emrich, CT, Morath, DP and Dunning, CM (2013) Integrating social vulnerability into federal flood risk management planning. Journal of Flood Risk Management 6, 332344.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A, Klapper, L, Singer, D, Ansar, S and Hess, J (2018) The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. Washington DC: World Bank Group. Available at
Doorn, N, Gardoni, P and Murphy, C (2018) A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: the role of social justice in defining resilience. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure 4(3): 112123. Available at
European Commission (2014) Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects, Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Frontier Economics (2013) The Economics of Climate Resilience: Appraising flood management initiatives–a case study. A report prepared for Defra and the devolved administration. Available at
Hallegatte, S (2006) A cost-benefit analysis of the New Orleans Flood Protection System. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Regulatory Analysis 06-02. Available at
Hallegatte, S, Green, C, Nicholls, RJ and Corfee-Morlot, J (2013) Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change 3, 802806.
Hallegatte, S, Bangalore, M and Vogt-Schilb, A (2016) Assessing socioeconomic resilience to floods in 90 countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7663. The World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at
Hallegatte, S, Vogt-Schilb, A, Bangalore, M and Rozenberg, J (2017) Unbreakable: Building the Resilience of the Poor in the Face of Natural Disasters. Washington, DC: World Bank.
HM Treasury (2011) The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: TSO.
Huizinga, J, de Moel, H and Szewczyk, W (2017) Global flood depth-damage functions. Methodology and the database with guidelines. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at
Kaufman, N (2014) Why is risk aversion unaccounted for in environmental policy evaluations? Climatic Change 125, 127135.
Kind, J (2014) Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management 7, 103117.
Kind, J, Botzen, WJW and Aerts, JCJH (2017) Accounting for risk aversion, income distribution and social welfare in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management. WIREs Climate Change 8, 120.
Krug, EG, Kresnow, M, Peddicord, JP, Dahlberg, LL, Powell, KE, Crosby, AE and Annest, JL (1999) Retraction: suicide after natural disasters. New England Journal of Medicine 340, 148149.
Lamond, J and Penning-Rowsell, E (2014) The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change. Climate Risk Management 2, 110.
Lanjouw, P, Marra, M and Nguyen, C (2013) Vietnam's evolving poverty map: patterns and implications for policy. Policy Research Working Paper No. 6355, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Lawless, RM (2005) Bankruptcy filing rates after a major hurricane. Nevada Law Journal 6, 720.
Mechler, R, Czajkowski, J, Kunreuther, H, Michel-Kerjan, E, Botzen, W, Keating, A, McQuistan, C, Cooper, N and O'Donnell, I (2014) Making Communities More Flood Resilient: The Role of Cost Benefit Analysis and Other Decision-Support Tools in Disaster Risk Reduction. Zurich Flood Resilience Alliance. Available at
Miller, TR (2000) Variations between countries in values of statistical life. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34, 169188.
Munich Re (2018) TOPICS Geo Natural catastrophes 2017. Available at
Nabangchang, O, Allaire, M, Leangcharoen, P, Jarungrattanapong, R and Whittington, D (2015) Economic costs incurred by households in the 2011 Greater Bangkok flood. Water Resources Research 51, 5877.
Naqvi, AA and Rehm, M (2014) A multi-agent model of a low income economy: simulating the distributional effects of natural disasters. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination 9, 275309.
Pearce, D, Atkinson, G and Mourato, S (2006) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Recent Developments. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Peduzzi, P (2017) Flooding: prioritizing protection? Nature Climate Change 7, 625626.
Reynaud, A, Nguyen, MH and Aubert, C (2017) Is there a demand for flood insurance in Vietnam? Results from a choice experiment. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 20, 593617.
Rose, A (2017) Defining and Measuring Economic Resilience from a Societal, Environmental and Security Perspective. Singapore: Springer.
Royal Haskoning DHV and Deltares (2013) Ho Chi Minh City Flood and Inundation Management, Final Report. Volume 2, IFRM Strategy, Annex 2: CBA Based on Flood Risk Approach. Unpublished manuscript, Royal Haskoning DHV. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Sayers, P, Penning-Rowsell, EC and Horritt, M (2018) Flood vulnerability, risk, and social disadvantage: current and future patterns in the UK. Regional Environmental Change 18, 339352.
SCFC (2012) The social-economical impacts of urban inundation to households and businesses in Ho Chi Minh City. Technical report, unpublished manuscript. The Steering Center for Flood Control Program HCMC, Viet Nam.
Scussolini, P, Tran, TVT, Koks, E, Diaz-Loaiza, A, Ho, PL and Lasage, R (2017) Adaptation to sea level rise: a multidisciplinary analysis for Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Water Resources Research 53, 841857.
Somanathan, E (2006) Valuing lives equally: distributional weights for welfare analysis. Economic Letters 90, 122125.
Squire, L and van der Tak, HG (1992) Economic Analysis of Projects, Seventh printing. World Bank Research Publication. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Stokkel, IMM (2015). Social protection for disaster risk management: opportunities for Myanmar. Myanmar social protection notes series; note 6. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available at
The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment (2000) The Hidden Costs of Coastal Hazards, Implications For Risk Assessment and Mitigation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Tol, RSJ (2014) Climate Economics, Economic Analysis of Climate, Climate Change and Climate Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
UNISDR (2011) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). Oxford, UK: Information Press. Available at
UNISDR (2015) Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). Available at
Ward, PJ, Jongman, B, Aerts, JCJH, Bates, PD, Botzen, WJW, Diaz Loaiza, A, Hallegatte, S, Kind, JM, Kwadijk, J, Scussolini, P and Winsemius, HC (2017) A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas. Nature Climate Change 7, 642646.
Weitzman, ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics 91, 119.
Winsemius, H, Jongman, B, Veldkamp, T, Hallegatte, S, Bangalore, M and Ward, P (2018) Disaster risk, climate change, and poverty: assessing the global exposure of poor people to floods and droughts. Environment and Development Economics 23, 328348.
Wisner, B (2013) Vulnerability as concept, model, metric, and tool. Available at
World Bank (2010) Vietnam – Weathering the Storm: Options for Disaster Risk Financing in Vietnam. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at
Xu, K, Evans, DE, Kawabate, K, Zeramdini, R, Klavus, J and Murray, CJL (2003) Household catastrophic health expenditure: a multicountry analysis. Lancet 362, 111117.
Zakour, MJ and Gillespie, DF (2013) Community Disaster Vulnerability, Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Springer.
Zerbe, RO Jr and Bellas, AS (2006) A Primer for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.


Social vulnerability in cost-benefit analysis for flood risk management

  • Jarl Kind (a1), W. J. Wouter Botzen (a2) (a3) (a4) and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed