Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Poverty-environment relationships under market heterogeneity: cash transfers and rural livelihoods in Zambia

  • Kathleen Lawlor (a1), Sudhanshu Handa (a2), Benjamin Davis (a3), David Seidenfeld (a4) and the Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4)...

Abstract

We examine the environmental impacts of a cash transfer program in rural Zambia and investigate whether variation in market access is associated with heterogeneous impacts on natural resource use. We consider households’ use of firewood, charcoal, bushmeat and land for farming, as well as their ownership of non-farm businesses. We find that cash transfers increase the likelihood of charcoal consumption as well as the amount consumed for those living close to paved roads. The transfers also enable households to increase the size of their farms and establish non-farm businesses. These impacts are most pronounced for those living far from paved roads. While remoteness is associated with farm expansion in response to the cash transfer, more education causes those receiving the transfer to decrease the size of their farms. This impact heterogeneity has important implications for sustainable development.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: klawlor@unca.edu

References

Hide All
Alix-Garcia, J, McIntosh, C, Sims, KRE and Welch, JR (2013) The ecological footprint of poverty alleviation: evidence from Mexico's Oportunidades program. The Review of Economics and Statistics 95, 417435.
Angelsen, A and Atmadja, S (2008) What is this book about? In Angelsen, A (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR, pp. 110.
Barbier, EB (2010) Poverty, environment and development. Environment and Development Economics 15, 635660.
Boone, R, Covarrubias, K, Davis, B and Winters, P (2013) Cash transfer programs and agricultural production: the case of Malawi. Agricultural Economics 44, 365378.
Dammert, AC (2009) Heterogeneous impacts of conditional cash transfers: evidence from Nicaragua. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58, 5383.
Day, M, Gumbo, D, Moombe, KB, Wijaya, A and Sunderland, T (2014) Zambia Country Profile: Monitoring, Reporting and Verification for REDD+. Occasional Paper 113, Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
Debela, B, Shively, G, Angelsen, A and Wik, M (2012) Economic shocks, diversification, and forest use in Uganda. Land Economics 88, 139154.
de Janvry, A and Sadoulet, E (2003) Progress in the modeling of rural households’ behavior under market failures. In de Janvry, A and Kanbur, R (eds), Poverty, Inequality and Development: Essays in Honor of Erik Thorbecke. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 155181.
Duflo, E (2003) Grandmothers and granddaughters: old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17, 125.
Ferraro, PJ, Hanauer, MM and Sims, KRE (2011) Conditions associated with protected area success in conservation and poverty reduction. PNAS 108, 1391313918.
Fisher, MM and Shively, GE (2005) Can income programs reduce tropical forest pressure? Income shocks and forest use in Malawi. World Development 37, 11151128.
Galiani, S and McEwan, PJ (2013) The heterogeneous impact of conditional cash transfers. Journal of Public Economics 103, 8596.
Handa, S and Davis, B (2006) The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Policy Review 24, 513536.
Handa, S, Davis, B, Stampini, M and Winters, PC (2010) Heterogeneous treatment effects in conditional cash transfer programmes: assessing the impact of Progresa on agricultural households. Journal of Development Effectiveness 2, 320335.
Handa, S, Seidenfeld, D, Davis, B and Tembo, G and the Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team (2014) Are Cash Transfers A Silver Bullet? Evidence from the Zambian Child Grant. Innocenti Working Paper no. 2014-08, Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.
Jalan, J and Somanathan, E (2008) The importance of being informed: experimental evidence on demand for environmental quality. Journal of Development Economics 87, 1428.
Joppa, LN and Pfaff, A (2009) High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4, e8273.
Koop, G and Tole, L (1999) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? Journal of Development Economics 58, 231244.
Lofgren, H and Robinson, S (1999) To Trade or not to Trade: Non-Separable farm Household Models in Partial and General Equilibrium. IFPRI Trade and Macroeconomics Division Discussion Paper No. 37, Washington, DC: IFPRI.
McSweeney, K (2005) Natural insurance, forest access, and compounded misfortune: forest resources in smallholder coping strategies before and after Hurricane Mitch, Northeastern Honduras. World Development 33, 14531471.
Mulenga, BP, Richardson, RB, Tembo, G and Mapemba, L (2014) Rural household participation in markets for non-timber forest products in Zambia. Environment and Development Economics 19, 487504.
Mulenga, BP, Hadunka, P and Richardson, RB (2017) Rural households’ participation in charcoal production in Zambia: does agricultural productivity play a role? Journal of Forest Economics 26, 5662.
Palermo, T, Handa, S, Peterman, A, Principe, L and Seidenfeld, D (2016) Unconditional government social cash transfer in Africa does not increase fertility. Journal of Population Economics 29, 10831111.
Pattanayak, SK and Sills, EO (2001) Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Economics 77, 595612.
Rawlings, LB and Rubio, GM (2005) Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. The World Bank Research Observer 20, 2955.
Reardon, T and Vosti, SA (1995) Links between rural poverty and the environment in developing countries: asset categories and investment poverty. World Development 23, 14951506.
Scherr, SJ (2000) A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25, 479498.
Sills, EO, Lele, S, Holmes, TP and Pattanayak, SK (2003) Nontimber forest products in the rural household economy. In Sills, EO and Abt, KL (eds), Forests in A Market Economy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 259281.
Singh, I, Squire, L and Strauss, J (1986) A survey of agricultural household models: recent findings and policy implications. The World Bank Economic Review 1, 149179.
Somanathan, E (2010) Effects of information on environmental quality in developing countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4, 275292.
Takasaki, Y, Barham, B and Coomes, O (2004) Risk coping strategies in tropical forests: floods, illnesses, and resource extraction. Environment and Development Economics 9, 203224.
Tembo, ST, Mulenga, BP and Sitko, N (2015) Cooking Fuel Choice in Urban Zambia: Implications on Forest Cover. IAPRI Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 94. Lusaka, Zambia: IAPRI.
Wunder, S (2001) Poverty alleviation and tropical forests – what scope for synergies? World Development 29, 18171833.

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Lawlor et al. supplementary material
Lawlor et al. supplementary material

 PDF (981 KB)
981 KB

Poverty-environment relationships under market heterogeneity: cash transfers and rural livelihoods in Zambia

  • Kathleen Lawlor (a1), Sudhanshu Handa (a2), Benjamin Davis (a3), David Seidenfeld (a4) and the Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team (a1) (a2) (a3) (a4)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed