Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives

  • ERWIN H. BULTE (a1), LESLIE LIPPER (a2), RANDY STRINGER (a3) and DAVID ZILBERMAN (a4)

Extract

Paying for the provision of environmental services is a recent policy innovation attracting much attention in both developed and developing countries. This innovation, referred to as ‘payments for ecosystem services’ (when the emphasis is on enhancing ‘nature’ services) or ‘payments for environmental services’ (when amenities provided by the built environment are also included) is referred to here as PES. PES programs aim to harness market forces to obtain more efficient environmental outcomes. Since so many opportunities for PES programs could involve farmers in poor regions, international aid agencies and private donors, looking for a double dividend, increasingly consider using PES programs as a potential way of meeting both social and environmental objectives.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Babcock, B.A., Lakshminarayan, P.G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D. 1996, ‘The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: a study of CRP contracts’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 961971.
Baumol, W. and Oates, W. 1989, The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coase, R.H. 1960, ‘The problem of social cost’, Journal of Law and Economics 3: 144.
Chomitz, K.M. et al. . 2007, ‘At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests’, World Bank Policy Research Report, Washington, DC: World Bank.
FAO 2007, Paying Farmers for Environmental Services, State of Food and Agriculture 2007, Rome: FAO.
Heath, J. and Binswanger, H. 1996, ‘Natural resource degradation effects of poverty and population growth are largely policy-induced: the case of Colombia’, Environment and Development Economics 1: 6584.
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G. 2005, ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33: 237253.
Perrot-Maître, D. 2006, The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A ‘Perfect’ PES Case? London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Vosti, S. and Reardon, T. (eds) 1997, Sustainability, Growth and Poverty Alleviation: A Policy and Agroecological Perspective, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wunder, S. 2005, ‘Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts’, CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, Bogor.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed