Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya

  • Hilary Ndambiri (a1), Roy Brouwer (a2) and Eric Mungatana (a3)

Abstract

The effect of preference uncertainty on estimated willingness to pay (WTP) is examined using identical payment cards and alternative uncertainty elicitation procedures in three split samples, focusing on air quality improvement in Nairobi. The effect of the stochastic payment card (SPC) and polychotomous payment card (PPC) are compared with a conventional payment card (PC). Substantial financial support is found for improved air quality in Nairobi, with approximately 85 per cent of the whole sample stating a positive WTP. The way WTP values are elicited, with and without ability to express preference uncertainty, has significant effect on WTP welfare estimate. Allowing respondents to express experienced uncertainty when stating WTP value yields more conservative but less accurate WTP values for inclusion in policy analysis. The PPC seems to hold more promise since it is easier to understand and imposes less cognitive burden on survey participants than the SPC in a developing country context.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Akter, S., Bennett, J., and Akhter, S. (2008), ‘Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation’, Ecological Economics 67(3): 345351.
Akter, S., Brouwer, R., Brander, L., and van Beukering, P. (2009), ‘Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets’, Ecological Economics 68(6): 18581863.
Alberini, A., Boyle, K., and Welsh, M. (2003), ‘Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(1): 4062.
Brouwer, R. (2011), ‘A mixed approach to payment certainty calibration in discrete choice welfare estimation’, Applied Economics 43(17): 21292142.
Cameron, T.A. and Huppert, D.D. (1989), ‘OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3): 230246.
Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2000), ‘Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden’, Journal of Applied Economics 32(6): 661669.
Carson, R.T. and Groves, T. (2007), ‘Incentive and informational properties of preference questions’, Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1): 181210.
CBS (2009), Economic Survey for 2009, Central Bureau of Statistics, Nairobi.
Champ, P.A. and Bishop, R.C. (2001), ‘Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: an empirical study of hypothetical bias’, Environmental and Resource Economics 19(4): 383402.
Chang, J.I., Yoo, S.H., and Kwak, S.J. (2007), ‘An investigation of preference uncertainty in the contingent valuation study’, Applied Economic Letters 14(9): 691695.
Du, X. and Mendelsohn, R.O. (2011), ‘Estimating the value of the reduction in air pollution during the Beijing Olympics’, Environment and Development Economics 16(6): 735749.
Dziegielewska, D.A. and Mendelsohn, R.O. (2007), ‘Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology’, Environmental and Resource Economics 38(1): 7187.
Ekstrand, E.R. and Loomis, J.B. (1998), ‘Incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay for protecting critical habitat for threatened and endangered fish’, Water Resources Research 34(11): 31493155.
Fabian, H.G. and Vergel, K.N. (2002), ‘Analysis of air pollution exposure of individuals in the road environment’, National Centre for Transportation Studies, College of Engineering, University of the Philippines, Manila.
Imaz, A., Habib, K.N.M., Shalaby, A., and Indris, A.O. (2014), ‘Investigating factors affecting transit user loyalty’, Journal of Public Transport 7(1): 3960.
Johannesson, M., Liljas, B., and Johansson, P.-O., (1998), ‘An experimental comparison of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions and real purchase decisions’, Applied Economics 30(5): 643647.
Kinney, P.L., Gatari, M., Volavka-Close, N., et al. (2011), ‘Traffic impacts on PM2.5 air quality in Nairobi, Kenya’, Environmental Science and Policy 14(4): 369378.
Logar, I. and van den Bergh, J.C. (2012), ‘Respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation of preventing beach erosion: an analysis with a polychotomous choice question’, Journal of Environmental Management 113: 184193.
Loomis, J.B. (1997), ‘Panel estimators to combine revealed and stated preference dichotomous choice data’, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(2): 233245.
Loomis, J.B. and Ekstrand, E. (1998), ‘Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican spotted owl’, Ecological Economics 27(1): 2941.
Martínez-Espiñeira, R. and Lyssenko, N. (2012), ‘Alternative approaches to dealing with respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparative analysis’, Journal of Environmental Management 93(1): 130139.
NEMA (2010), State of the Environment Report for Kenya, National Environment Management Authority, Nairobi.
Odhiambo, G.O., Kinyua, A.M., Gatebe, C.K., and Awange, J. (2010), ‘Motor vehicles air pollution in Nairobi, Kenya’, Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences 2(4): 178187.
Petrolia, D.R. and Kim, T.G. (2011), ‘Contingent valuation with heterogeneous reasons for uncertainty’, Resource and Energy Economics 33(3): 515526.
Ready, R., Whitehead, J., and Blomquist, G.C. (1995), ‘Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(2): 181197.
Rowe, R.D., Schulze, W.D., and Breffle, W. (1996), ‘A test for payment card biases’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31(2): 178185.
Ryan, M., Scott, D.A., and Donaldson, C. (2004), ‘Valuing health care using willingness to pay: a comparison of the payment card and dichotomous choice methods’, Journal of Health Economics 23(2): 237258.
Samnaliev, M., Stevens, T.H., and More, T. (2006), ‘A comparison of alternative certainty calibration techniques in contingent valuation’, Ecological Economics 57(3): 507519.
Shaikh, S., Sun, L., and van Kooten, G.C. (2007), ‘Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparison of empirical treatments’, Ecological Economics 62(1): 115125.
Shechter, M. and Kim, M. (1991), ‘Valuation of pollution abatement benefits: direct and indirect measurement’, Journal of Urban Economics 30(2): 133152.
Strazzera, E., Genius, M., Scarpa, R., and Hutchinson, G. (2003), ‘The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites’, Environmental and Resource Economics 25(4): 461476.
van Kooten, G.C., Krcmar, E., and Bulte, E.H. (2001), ‘Preference uncertainty in non-market valuation: a fuzzy approach’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3): 487500.
Vliet, E.D.S. and Kinney, P.L. (2007), ‘Impacts of roadway emissions on urban particulate matter concentrations in sub-Saharan Africa: new evidence from Nairobi, Kenya’, Environmental Research Letters 2(4): 15.
Vossler, C.A., Ethier, R.G., Poe, G.L., and Welsh, M.P. (2003), ‘Payment certainty in discrete choice contingent valuation responses: results from a field validity test’, Southern Economic Journal 69(4): 886902.
Wang, H. (1997), ‘Treatment of “Don't-Know” responses in contingent valuation surveys: a random valuation model’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 219232.
Wang, H. and He, J. (2011), ‘Estimating individual valuation distributions with multiple bounded discrete choice data’, Applied Economics 43(21): 26412656.
Wang, H. and Mullay, J. (2006), ‘Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China’, Science of the Total Environment 367(1): 5057.
Wang, H. and Whittington, D. (2000), ‘Willingness to pay for air quality improvement in Sofia, Bulgaria’, World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2280, Washington, DC.
Wang, H. and Whittington, D. (2005), ‘Measuring individuals' valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach’, Ecological Economics 55(2): 143154.
Wang, Y. and Zhang, Y.S. (2008), ‘Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji'nan, China’, Journal of Environmental Management 90(2): 10221029.
Wang, X.J., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Yang, K.Z., and Bai, M. (2006), ‘Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method: a case study in Beijing’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120(1): 153168.
Welsh, M.P. and Poe, G.L. (1998), ‘Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (2):170–185.
Wooldridge, J. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Comparing welfare estimates across stated preference and uncertainty elicitation formats for air quality improvements in Nairobi, Kenya

  • Hilary Ndambiri (a1), Roy Brouwer (a2) and Eric Mungatana (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed