Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:36:53.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconciling Automation and Flexibility? Technology and Production in the Postwar British Motor Vehicle Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Jonathan Zeitlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article contests the view that “stages of development” determine a uniquely appropriate set of production and marketing strategies for a given industry in a given period. Looking closely at the British automobile industry after World War II, it instead presents the argument that opportunities for significant choices between more or less flexible technologies and organizational forms constitute a continuous feature of modern economic history. Moreover, piecemeal borrowing and selective adaptation have been more common than wholesale imitation of any particular system, and modification and hybridization of imported technologies represent not resistance to “foreign” elements, but creative attempts to fit those elements to local conditions.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 9 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2000. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Abernathy, William J., Clark, Kim B., and Kantrow, Alan M.. Industrial Renaissance: Producing a Competitive Future for America. New York, 1983.Google Scholar
Bardou, Jean-Pierre, et al. The Automobile Revolution: The Impact of an Industry. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1982.Google Scholar
Beynon, Huw. Working for Ford. 2d ed. [1973]. Harmondsworth, 1984.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert, et al., eds. Between Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
Burbridge, John L. The Introduction of Group Technology. London, 1975.Google Scholar
Cairncross, Sir Alec. The British Economy since 1945. Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Cairncross, Sir Alec. The Years of Recovery: British Economic Policy, 1945–51. London, 1985.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. Herbert Austin: The British Motor Car Industry to 1941. London, 1979.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. The Rise and Decline of the British Motor Industry. London, 1994.Google Scholar
Cusumano, Michael A. The Japanese Automobile Industry: Technology and Management at Nissan and Toyota. Cambridge, Mass., 1985.Google Scholar
Dow, J. C. R. The Management of the British Economy, 1945–1960. Cambridge, U.K., 1970.Google Scholar
Dunnett, P. J. S. The Decline of the British Motor Industry: The Effects of Government Policy, 1945–1979. London, 1980.Google Scholar
Durcan, J. W. D., McCarthy, W. E. J., and Redman, G. P.. Strikes in Post-War Britain. London, 1983.Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James, Bowden, Sue, and McKinlay, Alan. The British Motor Industry. Manchester, U.K., 1995.Google Scholar
Giacosa, Dante. Forty Years of Design with Fiat. Trans. Sadleir, Richard. Brentford, U.K., 1979.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryn. Forcing the Factory of the Future: Cybernation and Societal Institutions. Cambridge, U.K., 1997.Google Scholar
Laux, James M. The European Automobile Industry. New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William. Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor. Cambridge, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
Lewchuk, Wayne. American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry. Cambridge, U.K., 1987.Google Scholar
Loubet, Jean-Louis. Automobiles Peugeot: Une réussite industrielle, 1945–1974 (Paris, 1990).Google Scholar
Loubet, Jean-Louis. Citroën, Peugeot, Renault et les autres: Soixante ans de stratégies. Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Maxcy, George, and Silberston, Aubrey. The Motor Industry. London, 1959.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, 1992.Google Scholar
Milward, Alan S., and Brennan, George. Britain’s Place in the World: A Historical Enquiry into Import Controls, 1945–60. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Ohno, Taiichi. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Cambridge, Mass., 1988.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J., and Sabel, Charles F.. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, 1984.Google Scholar
Poitou, Jean-Pierre. Le cerveau de l’usine: Histoire des bureaux d’études Renault de l’origine à 1980. Aix-en-Provence, 1988.Google Scholar
Pratten, C. F. Economies of Scale in Manufacturing Industry. Cambridge, U.K., 1976.Google Scholar
Rhys, D. G. The Motor Industry: An Economic Survey. London, 1972.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Sebastian. Industry and Air Power: The Expansion of British Aircraft Production, 1935–1941. London, 1997.Google Scholar
Robson, Graham. The Rover Story. 4th ed. Wellingborough, U.K., 1988.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds. World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization. Cambridge, U.K., 1997.Google Scholar
Starkey, Ken, and McKinlay, Alan. Strategy and the Human Resource: Ford and the Search for Competitive Advantage. Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Tolliday, Steven, and Zeitlin, Jonathan, eds. Between Fordism and Flexibility: The Automobile Industry and Its Workers. New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. L’évolution du travail ouvrier aux usines Renault. Paris, 1955.Google Scholar
Turner, Graham. Business in Britain. Harmondsworth, U.K., 1969.Google Scholar
Turner, Graham. The Leyland Papers. London, 1971.Google Scholar
Turner, H. A., Clack, Garfield, and Roberts, Geoffrey. Labour Relations in the Motor Industry. London, 1967.Google Scholar
Volpato, Giuseppe. L’industria automobilistica internazionale. Padua, 1983.Google Scholar
Wells, S. J. British Export Performance. Cambridge, U.K., 1964.Google Scholar
Whipp, Richard, and Clark, Peter. Innovation and the Auto Industry: Product, Process and Work Organization. New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Whisler, Timothy R. At the End of the Road: The Rise and Fall of Austin-Healy, MG, and Triumph Sports Cars. Greenwich, Conn., 1995.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Mira, and Hill, Frank E.. American Business Abroad: Ford on Six Continents. Detroit, Mich., 1964.Google Scholar
Wilks, Stephen. Industrial Policy and the Motor Industry. Manchester, U.K., 1984.Google Scholar
Williams, Karel, et al. Cars: Analysis, History, Cases. Providence, R.I., 1994.Google Scholar
Williams, Karel, Williams, John, and Haslam, Colin. The Breakdown of AustinRover. Leamington Spa, U.K., 1987.Google Scholar
Willman, Paul, and Winch, Graham. Innovation and Management Control: Labour Relations at BL Cars. Cambridge, U.K., 1985.Google Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel. The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Wood, Jonathan. Wheels of Misfortune: The Decline of the British Motor Industry. London, 1988.Google Scholar
Woollard, Frank G. Principles of Mass and Flow Production. London, 1954.Google Scholar
Wyatt, R. J. The Austin, 1905–1952. Newton Abbott, U.K., 1981.Google Scholar
Young, Stephen, and Hood, Neil. Chrysler UK: A Corporation in Transition. New York, 1977.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan Between Flexibility and Mass Production: Strategic Debate and Industrial Reorganization in British Engineering, 1830–1990. Oxford, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan, and Herrigel, Gary, eds. Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Postwar Europe and Japan. Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Bowden, Sue. “Competition and Collusion in the Finance Sector in the Postwar Period.” Financial History Review 4 (1997): 161–79.Google Scholar
Bowden, Sue. “The Motor Vehicle Industry.” In The Political Economy of Nationalization in Britain, 1920–1950, ed. Millward, Robert and Singleton, John. Cambridge, U.K., 1995, 88–115.Google Scholar
Bowden, Sue and Maltby, Josephine. “‘More a National Asset than an Investor’s Paradise’: Financial Management and the British Motor Corporation, 1952–68.” Accounting, Business and Financial History 8, no. 2 (1998): 137–64.Google Scholar
Bowden, Sue and Turner, Paul, “Uncertainty and the Competitive Decline of the British Motor Industry, 1945–75.” New Political Economy 3, no. 1 (1998): 103–20.Google Scholar
Church, Roy and Miller, Michael A.. “The Big Three: Competition, Management, and Marketing in the British Motor Industry, 1922–1939.” In Essays in British Business History, ed. Supple., Barry Oxford, 1977, 163–86.Google Scholar
Church, Roy. “Motor Manufacturing,” in British Industry between the Wars, ed. Buxton, N. K. and Aldcroft, D. H.. London, 1979, 188–200.Google Scholar
Daito, Eisuke. “Automation and the Organization of Production in the Japanese Automobile Industry: Nissan and Toyota in the 1950s.” Enterprise & Society 1 (March 2000): 139–78.Google Scholar
French, Michael. “Manufacturing and Models in the Commercial Vehicle Industry: The Albion Motor Company, 1920–1956.” Journal of Transport History, 3d ser. 15 (1994): 59–77.Google Scholar
French, Michael. “Public Policy and British Commercial Vehicles during the Export Drive Era, 1945–50.” Business History 40, no. 2 (1998): 22–44.Google Scholar
Holden, Len. “‘Think of Me Simply as the Skipper’: Industrial Relations at Vauxhall, 1920–1950.” Oral History 9, no, 2 (1981): 18–32.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. “Automation, Transfer Machinery, and Mass Production in the U.S. Automobile Industry in the Post-World War II Era.” Enterprise & Society 1 (March 2000): 100–38.Google Scholar
Hounshell, David A. “Planning and Executing ‘Automation’ at Ford Motor Company, 1945–1965: The Cleveland Engine Plant and Its Consequences.” In Fordism Transformed: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Production Methods in the Automobile Industry, ed. Shiomi, Haruhito and Wada, Kazuo. Oxford, 1996, 49–86.Google Scholar
Hugill, Peter J. “Technology Diffusion in the World Automobile Industry, 1885–1985.” In The Transfer and Transformation of Ideas and Material Culture, ed. Hugill, and Dickson, D. Bruce. College Station, Texas, 1988, 110–47.Google Scholar
Jones, D. T., and Prais, S. J.. “Plant-Size and Productivity in the Motor Industry: Some International Comparisons.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 40 (1978): 131–51.Google Scholar
Lewchuk, Wayne. “The Motor Vehicle Industry.” In The Decline of the British Economy, ed. Elbaum, Bernard and Lazonick, William. Oxford, 1986, 135–61.Google Scholar
Lyddon, David. “The Myth of Mass Production and the Mass Production of Myth.” Historical Studies in Industrial Relations 1 (1996): 77–105.Google Scholar
Mair, Andrew. “From British Leyland Motor Corporation to Rover Group: The Search for a Viable British Model.” In One Best Way? Trajectories and Industrial Models of the World’s Automobile Producers, ed. Freyssenet, Michel et al. Oxford, 1998, 395–417.Google Scholar
Owen, Geoffrey. “From Mass-Market Manufacturer to Niche Player: Product and Marketing Strategy at British Leyland/Rover from 1968 to 1995.” In Japanese Success? British Failure? Comparisons in Business Performance since 1945, ed. Abe, Etsuo and Gourvish, Terry. Oxford, 1997, 214–36.Google Scholar
Pearson, Sir Reginald. “From Group Bonus to Straight Time Pay.” Journal of Industrial Economics 8 (1960): 113–21.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Sebastian. “A New Audit of War: The Productivity of Britain’s Wartime Aircraft Industry Reconsidered.” War & Society 12 (1994): 125–47.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization.” Past and Present 108 (1985): 133–76.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. “New Developments in Manufacturing: The Just-in-Time System.” Capital and Class 30 (1986): 43–72.Google Scholar
Shimokawa, Koichi. “From the Ford System to the Just-in-Time Production System.” Japanese Yearbook on Business History 10 (1993): 84–105.Google Scholar
Silberston, Aubrey. “The Motor Industry, 1955–1964.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 39 (1965): 253–80.Google Scholar
Tidd, Joseph, and Fujimoto, Takahiro. “Work Organization, Production Technology and Product Strategy of the Japanese and British Automobile Industries.” Current Politics and Economics of Japan 4, no. 4 (1995): 241–80.Google Scholar
Tiratsoo, Nick. “The Motor Car Industry.” In Labour Governments and Private Industry: The Case of 1945–51, ed. Mercer, Helen, Rollings, Neil, and Tomlinson, Jim. Edinburgh, 1992, 162–85.Google Scholar
Tiratsoo, Nick. “Standard Motors 1945–55 and the Postwar Malaise of British Management.” In Management and Business in Britain and France: The Age of the Corporate Economy, ed. Cassis, Youssef, Crouzet, François, and Gourvish, Terry. Oxford, 1995, 88–108.Google Scholar
Tolliday, Steven. “Ford and ‘Fordism’ in Postwar Britain: Enterprise Management and the Control of Labour, 1937–1987.” In The Power to Manage? Employers and Industrial Relations in Comparative-Historical Perspective, ed. Tolliday, Steven and Zeitlin, Jonathan. London, 1991, 81–114.Google Scholar
Tolliday, Steven. “High Tide and After: Coventry Engineering Workers and Shop-floor Bargaining, 1945–1980.” In Life and Labour in a Twentieth-Century City: The Case of Coventry, ed. Lancaster, Bill and Mason, Tony. Coventry, U.K., 1986, 204–43.Google Scholar
Vernon, Raymond, “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Life Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (1966): 190–207.Google Scholar
Whisler, Timothy R. “The British Motor Industry and the Government: A Reappraisal.” Business and Economic History 25, no, 1 (1996): 196–206.Google Scholar
Whisler, Timothy R. “The Outstanding Potential Market: The British Motor Industry and Europe, 1945–75.” Journal of Transport History, 3d ser., 15 (1994): 1–19.Google Scholar
Williams, Karel. “BMC/BLMC/BL—A Misunderstood Failure.” In Williams, Karel, Williams, John, and Thomas, Dennis. Why Are the British Bad at Manufacturing? London, 1983, 217–80.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. “Instability and Economic Growth.” In Economic Growth in Twentieth-Century Britain, ed. Aldcroft, Derek H. and Fearon, Peter. London, 1969, 184–95.Google Scholar

Magazines and Newspapers

Automobile Engineer. 1946–69.Google Scholar
Engineering. 1950–51; 1958; 1961–63.Google Scholar
Financial Times. Nov., Dec. 1998.Google Scholar
Journal of the Institution of Production Engineers / Institution of Production Engineers’ Journal. 1953; 1955; 1957; 1959.Google Scholar
Machinist. 1955.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Institution of Automobile Engineers. 1924/25. Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 1947.Google Scholar

Government Documents

[Note that all PRO documents are held at the Public Record Office, Kew.]Google Scholar
British Productivity Council. Applying the Pressure: A Review of Productivity in the Pressed Metal Industry. London, 1954.Google Scholar
Central Policy Review Staff. The Future of the British Car Industry. London, 1975.Google Scholar
House of Commons, 14th Report of the Select Committee on Expenditure (Trade and Industry Subcommittee). Parliamentary Papers, 1974–75, xxv.Google Scholar
Ministry of Supply, National Advisory Council for the Motor Manufacturing Industry. Report on Proceedings. London, 1947.Google Scholar
“Notes of the Meeting of the PEP Engineering Group, 31 May 1948.” PRO SUPP 14/330.Google Scholar
Political and Economic Planning. Motor Vehicles. London, 1950.Google Scholar
“Post-War Resettlement of the Motor Industry.” CAB 124/626, Public Record Office, Kew.Google Scholar
Price Commission. Prices, Costs and Margins in the Manufacture and Distribution of Car Parts. House of Commons Papers 220. London, 1979.Google Scholar
PRO BT 258/460: US(E).Google Scholar
PRO BT 64/2314.Google Scholar

Unpublished Sources

Bowden, Sue, and Turner, Paul. “Stop-Go, Hire-Purchase and the British Motor Vehicle Industry.” University of Leeds, 1993.Google Scholar
Wellhöner, Volker. “‘Wirtschaftswunder’—Weltmarkt—Westdeutscher Fordismus: Der Fall Volkswagen.” Habilitation thesis, University of Bielefeld, 1993.Google Scholar
Sako, Mari. “Supplier Development at Honda, Nissan, and Toyota: A Historical Case Study of Organizational Capability Enhancement.” Said Business School, Oxford University, Oct. 1998.Google Scholar