Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:26:40.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modern English usage from Britain to America

Bryan Garner follows Henry Fowler from A Dictionary of Modern American English Usage to Garner's Modern English Usage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2018

Robin Straaijer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Garner's Modern English Usage (hereafter Garner4) was published by Oxford University Press USA in 2016. Appearing within a span of two decades, it is the fourth edition of Bryan Garner's dictionary of usage, originally published as A Dictionary of Modern American Usage (Garner, 1998, hereafter Garner1). It is also the second dictionary of English usage to be published during the last three years, following the latest edition of what is arguably its most direct British counterpart, Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage (Butterfield, 2015, hereafter Fowler4).

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 34 , Special Issue 4: “Bridging the Unbridgeable”: Special Issue on Prescriptivism , December 2018 , pp. 39 - 47
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderwald, L. 2014. ‘Measuring the success of prescriptivism: Quantitative grammaticography, corpus linguistics and the progressive passive.’ English Language & Linguistics, 18(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1360674313000257Google Scholar
Beal, J. C. 2009. ‘Three hundred years of prescriptivism (and counting).’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken-Boon & van der Wurff, W. (eds.), Current Issues in Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. 1996. The New Fowler's Modern English Usage (rev. 3rd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Busse, U. & Schröder, A.. 2010. ‘How Fowler became “The Fowler”: An anatomy of a success story.’ English Today, 26(2), 45–54. doi: 10.1017/S0266078410000088Google Scholar
Butterfield, J. 2015. Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage (4th edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butters, R. 1982. ‘Quoting with go “say”.’ American Speech 57(2), 148–49. doi: 10.2307/454452Google Scholar
Carter, R. 1999. ‘Standard grammars, spoken grammars and education.’ In Bex, T. & Watts, R. (eds.), Standard English: the Widening Debate. London: Routledge, pp. 149–66.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. 2010. ‘Bad ideas in the history of English usage.’ In Cloutier, R. A., Hamilton–Brehm, A. M. & Kretzschmar, W. A. Jr. (eds.) Studies in the History of the English Language: Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 141–59.Google Scholar
Curzan, A. 2002. ‘Teaching the politics of Standard English.’ Journal of English Linguistics, 30(4), 339–52. doi: 10.1177/007542402237882Google Scholar
Curzan, A. 2014. Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139107327Google Scholar
D'Arcy, A. 2007. ‘Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction.’ American Speech, 82(4), 386–419. doi: 10.1215/00031283-2007-025Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. 1926. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, B. 1998. A Dictionary of Modern American Usage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, B. 2000. ‘A Texan Fowler?’ English Today, 16(4), 3–10. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400000468Google Scholar
Garner, B. 2001. ‘Calling for a truce in the descriptivist-prescriptivist wars.’ English Today 17 (2), 5–9. doi: 10.1017/S0266078401002012Google Scholar
Garner, B. 2003. Garner's Modern American Usage (2nd edn.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, B. 2009. Garner's Modern American Usage (3rd edn.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, B. 2016. Garner's Modern English Usage (4th edn.) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1965. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (rev. 2nd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, L., Szmrecsanyi, B. & Bohmann, A.. 2015. ‘Which-hunting and the Standard English relative clause.’ Language, 91(4), 806–36. doi: 10.1353/lan.2015.0062Google Scholar
Kaunisto, M. 2017. ‘Which items need to be standardised? Variation in the choice of entries in usage guides.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon & Percy, C. (eds.), Prescription and Tradition in Language: Establishing Standards across Time and Space. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 202–20.Google Scholar
McArthur, T. 1999. ‘ … That is for ever Fowler.’ English Today, 15(4), 59–61. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400011305Google Scholar
Milroy, James. ‘Children can't speak or write properly any more.’ In Bauer, L. & Trudgill, P.. 1998. Language Myths. London: Penguin, pp. 58–65.Google Scholar
Peters, P. 2004. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, P. 2018. ‘The lexicography of English usage.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
Smits, M. 2017. ‘“Garnering” respect: The emergency of authority in the American usage tradition.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon & Percy, C. (eds.), Prescription and Tradition in Language: Establishing Standards across Time and Space. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 221–37.Google Scholar
Straaijer, R. 2016. ‘Time for a new (but not “new”) Fowler.’ English Today, 32(2), 1–5. doi: 10.1017/S0266078415000620Google Scholar
Straaijer, R. 2018. ‘The Usage guide: Evolution of a genre.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Tieken–Boon van Ostade, I. 2018. ‘Introduction.’ In van Ostade, I. Tieken–Boon (ed.), English Usage Guides. History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. 2005. ‘Language wars truce accepted (with conditions).’ Green Bag 2D 8, 281–90. Online at <https://ssrn.com/abstract=1809960> (Accessed July 23 , 2017).+(Accessed+July+23+,+2017).>Google Scholar
Wachal, R. 2000. ‘Review of two handbooks on style and usage.’ American Speech, 75(2), 199–207. doi: 10.1215/00031283-75-2-199Google Scholar