3 See my previous Editorial at (2007) 9 Ecc LJ 247–248.
R (on the application of Baiai and Trzinska & others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department  UKHL 53, at para 37, per Baroness Hale of Richmond (emphasis added).
Hill, M, Ecclesiastical Law (third edition, Oxford, 2007), para 5.34.
6 The existence of such a right has been questioned by
Doe, N: see Legal Framework of the Church of England (Oxford, 1996), pp 358–362
. He styles it ‘a legal fiction’ on p 359.
7 For an authoritative and revisionist view doubting the received understanding and approving Doe (above), see M Smith, ‘An interpretation of Argar v Holdsworth’, (1998) 5 Ecc LJ 34, and, for a spirited defence of the orthodox view, see J Humphreys, ‘The right to marry in church: a rehabilitation of Argar v Holdsworth’, (2004) 7 Ecc LJ 405.
8 See the Matrimonial Causes Act 1965, s 8(2); the Marriage Act 1949, s 5A (as amended by the Marriage (Prohibited Degrees of Relationship) Act 1986, s 3 and the Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007, SI 2007/438, art 2(b)); the Marriage Act 1949, s 5B (as amended by the Gender Recognition Act 2004, s 11, Sch 4).
9 The Employment Tribunal made a better (if not entirely successful) attempt at addressing discrimination in Ladele v London Borough of Islington, as did the High Court in Singh v Aberdare Girls' High School (see Case Notes at pages 122–123 and 126–127 respectively of this issue), although these cases were overtly founded upon discrimination legislation rather than placing reliance on the interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998 with particular reference to religious liberty.
10 See the Church of England Marriage Measure 2008.