Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:20:05.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combined effects of rainfall regime and plot length on runoff and soil loss in the Loess Plateau of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Jianbo LIU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Email: bfu@rcees.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Guangyao GAO
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Email: bfu@rcees.ac.cn
Shuai WANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Email: bfu@rcees.ac.cn
Bojie FU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. Email: bfu@rcees.ac.cn
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to study the interaction effects of rainfall regime and slope length on runoff and soil loss under different land uses. Event runoff and soil loss in forest, shrub and grass were measured in plots with lengths of 5, 9 and 13m in the Loess Plateau from 2008 to 2016. A total of 59 erosive rainfall events were recorded and classified into three rainfall regimes. Firstly, the results showed that the runoff coefficient was grass>shrub>forest, and soil loss was grass>forest>shrub, but the differences between forest and shrub in runoff and between grass and forest in soil loss did not reach significant levels. Secondly, rainfall regimes had an important effect on runoff and soil loss under different land uses. The lowest runoff coefficients and the highest soil loss in regime 2 were found in shrub and forest land, respectively, which differed from that of regime 1. In total, rainfall regime 1 had the highest runoff coefficient of 0.84–2.06%, followed by regime 3 with 0.33–0.88% and regime 2 with 0.04–0.06%. Soil loss in forest and grass land had a different order of regime 3>regime 1>regime 2. Thirdly, both the runoff coefficient and soil loss decreased with increasing plot length, while the effect of slope length on runoff/soil loss were influenced by land use type and rainfall regimes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6. References

Allen, S. T., Brooks, J. R., Keim, R. F., Bond, B. J. & McDonnell, J. J. 2014. The role of pre- event canopy storage in throughfall and stemflow by using isotopic tracers. Ecohydrology: Ecosystems, Land and Water Process Interactions, Ecohydrogeomorphology 7, 858868.Google Scholar
Angel, J. R., Palecki, M. A. & Hollinger, S. E. 2005. Storm precipitation in the United States. Part ii: soil erosion characteristics. Journal of Applied Meteorology 44, 947959.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. 2015. Extreme rainfall and its impact on cultivated landscapes with particular reference to Britain. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40, 21212130.Google Scholar
Bochet, E., Rubio, J. L. & Poesen, J. 1998. Relative efficiency of three representative matorral species in reducing water erosion at the microscale in a semi-arid climate (Valencia, Spain). Geomorphology 23, 139150.Google Scholar
Boix-Fayos, C., Martinez-Mena, M., Arnau-Rosalen, E., Calvo-Cases, A., Castillo, V. & Albaladejo, J. 2006. Measuring soil erosion by field plots: understanding the sources of variation. Earth-Science Reviews 78, 267285.Google Scholar
Calder, I. R. 2001. Canopy processes: implications for transpiration, interception and splash induced erosion, ultimately for forest management and water resources. Plant Ecology 153, 203214.Google Scholar
Cammeraat, E. L. H. 2004. Scale dependent thresholds in hydrological and erosion response of a semi-arid catchment in southeast Spain. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 104, 317332.Google Scholar
Chaplot, V. A. M. & Le Bissonnais, Y. 2003. Runoff features for interrill erosion at different rainfall intensities, slope lengths, and gradients in an agricultural loessial hillslope. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 844851.Google Scholar
Chen, X. A., Cai, Q. G., Zhang, L. C., Zheng, M., Qi, J. Y. & Li, J. L. 2011. Impact of slope length on soil erosion under different rainfall intensity in a hilly loess region on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil Science 42, 721725.Google Scholar
Cheng, J. D., Lin, L. L. & Lu, H. S. 2002. Influences of forests on water flows from headwater watersheds in Taiwan. Forest Ecology and Management 165, 1128.Google Scholar
Chirino, E., Bonet, A., Bellot, J. & Sanchez, J. R. 2006. Effects of 30-year-old Aleppo pine plantations on runoff, soil erosion, and plant diversity in a semi-arid landscape in south eastern Spain. Catena 65, 1929.Google Scholar
Crockford, R. H. & Richardson, D. P. 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes 14, 29032920.Google Scholar
Dunkerley, D. 2010. How do the rain rates of sub-event intervals such as the maximum 5-and 15-min rates (i-5 or i-30) relate to the properties of the enclosing rainfall event? Hydrological Processes 24, 24252439.Google Scholar
Elwell, H. A. & Stocking, M. A. 1976. Vegetal cover to estimate soil erosion hazard in Rhodesia. Geoderma 15, 6170.Google Scholar
Fang, H. Y., Cai, Q. G., Chen, H. & Li, Q. Y. 2008. Effect of rainfall regime and slope on runoff in a gullied loess region on the Loess Plateau in China. Environmental Management 42, 402411.Google Scholar
Fang, N. F., Shi, Z. H., Li, L., Guo, Z. L., Liu, Q. J. & Ai, L. 2012. The effects of rainfall regimes and land use changes on runoff and soil loss in a small mountainous watershed. Catena 99, 18.Google Scholar
Feng, X. M., Sun, G., Fu, B. J., Su, C. H., Liu, Y. & Lamparski, H. 2012. Regional effects of vegetation restoration on water yield across the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16, 26172628.Google Scholar
Findeling, A., Ruy, S. & Scopel, E. 2003. Modeling the effects of a partial residue mulch on runoff using a physically based approach. Journal of Hydrology 275, 4966.Google Scholar
Frauenfeld, B. & Truman, C. 2004. Variable rainfall intensity effects on runoff and interrill erosion from two coastal plain ultisols in Georgia. Soil Science 169, 143154.Google Scholar
Fu, B. J., Liu, Y., Lu, Y. H., He, C. S., Zeng, Y. & Wu, B. F. 2011. Assessing the soil erosion control service of ecosystems change in the Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Complexity 8, 284293.Google Scholar
Fusun, S., Jinniu, W., Tao, L., Yan, W., Haixia, G. & Ning, W. 2013. Effects of different types of vegetation recovery on runoff and soil erosion on a Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslide, China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 68, 138145.Google Scholar
Gao, G. Y., Fu, B. J., Lu, Y. H., Liu, Y., Wang, S. & Zhou, J. 2012. Coupling the modified SCS-CN and RUSLE models to simulate hydrological effects of restoring vegetation in the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16, 23472364.Google Scholar
Ghahramani, A. & Ishikawa, Y. 2013. Water flux and sediment transport within a forested landscape: the role of connectivity, subsurface flow, and slope length scale on transport mechanism. Hydrological Processes 27, 40914102.Google Scholar
González-Hidalgo, J. C., Peña-Monné, J. L. & de Luis, M. 2007. A review of daily soil erosion in western Mediterranean areas. Catena 71, 193199.Google Scholar
Gyssels, G., Poesen, J., Bochet, E. & Li, Y. 2005. Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progress in Physical Geography 29, 189217.Google Scholar
Hong, N. 2003. Products and servicing solution teaching book for SPSS of Windows Statistical, 300311. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press and Communication University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, S. Z., Zhang, L., Song, X. Y., Zhang, S. H., Liu, X. Z., Liang, Y. L. & Zheng, S. Q. 2001. Runoff and sediment loss responses to rainfall and land use in two agricultural catchments on the Loess Plateau of China. Hydrological Processes 15, 977988.Google Scholar
Kinnell, P. I. A. 2005. Why the universal soil loss equation and the revised version of it do not predict event erosion well. Hydrological Processes 19, 851854.Google Scholar
Kinnell, P. I. A. 2007. Runoff dependent erosivity and slope length factors suitable for modelling annual erosion using the universal soil loss equation. Hydrological Processes 21, 26812689.Google Scholar
Li, X., Niu, J. & Xie, B. 2014. The effect of leaf litter cover on surface runoff and soil erosion in northern China. Plos One 9, 115.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Poesen, J., Yang, J. C., Fu, B. & Zhang, J. H. 2003. Evaluating gully erosion using cs-137 and pb-210/cs-137 ratio in a reservoir catchment. Soil & Tillage Research 69, 107115.Google Scholar
Liu, B. Y., Nearing, M. A., Shi, P. J. & Jia, Z. W. 2000. Slope length effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 17591763.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Fu, B. J., Lu, Y. H., Wang, Z. & Gao, G. Y. 2012. Hydrological responses and soil erosion potential of abandoned cropland in the Loess Plateau, China. Geomorphology 138, 404414.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. J., Yang, J., Hu, J. M., Tang, C. J. & Zheng, H. J. 2016. Characteristics of the surface-subsurface flow generation and sediment yield to the rainfall regime and land-cover by long-term in-situ observation in the red soil region, southern China. Journal of Hydrology 539, 457467.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. H., Fu, B. J., Feng, X. M., Zeng, Y., Liu, Y., Chang, R. Y., Sun, G. & Wu, B. F. 2012. A policy-driven large scale ecological restoration: quantifying ecosystem services changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Plos One 7, 110.Google Scholar
Mayor, A. G., Bautista, S. & Bellot, J. 2011. Scale-dependent variation in runoff and sediment yield in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment. Journal of Hydrology 397, 128135.Google Scholar
Millward, A. A. & Mersey, J. E. 1999. Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena 38, 109129.Google Scholar
Nunes, A. N., De Almeida, A. C. & Coelho, C. O. 2011. Impacts of land use and cover type on runoff and soil erosion in a marginal area of Portugal. Applied Geography 31, 687699.Google Scholar
Pannkuk, C. D. & Robichaud, P. R. 2003. Effectiveness of needle cast at reducing erosion after forest fires. Water Resources Research 39, 19.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. J., Brazier, R. E., Wainwright, J. & Powell, D. M. 2006. Scale relationships in hillslope runoff and erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31, 13841393.Google Scholar
Parsons, A. J. & Stone, P. M. 2006. Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion. Catena 67, 6878.Google Scholar
Peng, T. & Wang, S. J. 2012. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the surface runoff and soil loss on karst slopes in southwest China. Catena 90, 5362.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R. & Blair, R. 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267, 11171123.Google Scholar
Puigdefabregas, J., Sole, A., Gutierrez, L., del Barrio, G. & Boer, M. 1999. Scales and processes of water and sediment redistribution in drylands: results from the Rambla Honda field site in southeast Spain. Earth-Science Reviews 48, 3970.Google Scholar
Quinton, J. N., Edwards, G. M. & Morgan, R. P. C. 1997. The influence of vegetation species and plant properties on runoff and soil erosion: results from a rainfall simulation study in south east Spain. Soil Use and Management 13, 143148.Google Scholar
Ramos, M. C. & Martinez-Casasnovas, J. A. 2009. Impacts of annual precipitation extremes on soil and nutrient losses in vineyards of NE Spain. Hydrological Processes 23, 224235.Google Scholar
Ran, Q., Su, D., Li, P. & He, Z. 2012. Experimental study of the impact of rainfall characteristics on runoff generation and soil erosion. Journal of Hydrology , 99111.Google Scholar
Sadeghi, S. H. R., Seghaleh, M. B. & Rangavar, A. S. 2013. Plot sizes dependency of runoff and sediment yield estimates from a small watershed. Catena 102, 5561.Google Scholar
Shi, H. & Shao, M. G. 2000. Soil and water loss from the Loess Plateau in China. Journal of Arid Environments 45, 920.Google Scholar
Smets, T., Poesen, J. & Bochet, E. 2008. Impact of plot length on the effectiveness of different soil-surface covers in reducing runoff and soil loss by water. Progress in Physical Geography 32, 654677.Google Scholar
Sun, L., Zhang, G. H., Wang, B. & Luan, L. L. 2017. Soil erosion resistance of black locust land with different ages of returning farmland on Loess Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 33, 191197. [In Chinese.]Google Scholar
Wei, W., Chen, L. D., Fu, B. J., Huang, Z. L., Wu, D. P. & Gui, L. D. 2007. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China. Journal of Hydrology 335, 247258.Google Scholar
Wei, W., Chen, L. D., Fu, B. J., Lu, Y. H. & Gong, J. 2009. Responses of water erosion to rainfall extremes and vegetation types in a loess semiarid hilly area, NW China. Hydrological Processes 23, 17801791.Google Scholar
Wei, W., Jia, F. Y., Yang, L., Chen, L. D., Zhang, H. D. & Yu, Y. 2014. Effects of surficial condition and rainfall intensity on runoff in a loess hilly area, China. Journal of Hydrology 513, 115126.Google Scholar
Wischmeier, W. H. & Smith, D. D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning, 537. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Agriculture Handbook.Google Scholar
Xin, Z. B., Xu, J. X. & Zheng, W. 2008. Spatiotemporal variations of vegetation cover on the Chinese Loess Plateau (1981–2006): impacts of climate changes and human activities. Science in China Series D-Earth Sciences 51, 6778.Google Scholar
Xu, X. L., Liu, W., Kong, Y. P., Zhang, K. L., Yu, B. F. & Chen, J. D. 2009. Runoff and water erosion on road side-slopes: effects of rainfall characteristics and slope length. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment 14, 497501.10.1016/j.trd.2009.05.006Google Scholar
Yeh, H. Y., Wensel, L. C. & Turnblom, E. C. 2000. An objective approach for classifying precipitation patterns to study climatic effects on tree growth. Forest Ecology and Management 139, 4150.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. H., Liu, G. B., Yi, L. & Zhang, P. C. 2014. Effects of patterned Artemisia capillaris on overland flow resistance under varied rainfall intensities in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics 62, 334342.Google Scholar
Zhao, G., Mu, X., Wen, Z., Wang, F. & Gao, P. 2013. Soil erosion, conservation, and eco-environment changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation & Development 24, 499510.Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Zhao, S. & Zhu, C. 2012. The Grain for Green Project induced land cover change in the Loess Plateau: a case study with Ansai County, Shanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators 23, 8894.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Fu, B., Gao, G., , Y., Liu, Y., , N. & Wang, S. 2016. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 137, 111.Google Scholar
Zuazo, V. H. D. & Pleguezuelo, C. R. R. 2008. Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28, 6586.Google Scholar