Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Slow Progress in Preparing for Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies

  • Richard J. Hatchett
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Slow Progress in Preparing for Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Slow Progress in Preparing for Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Slow Progress in Preparing for Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Richard J. Hatchett, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHS/ASPR/BARDA), 375 E Street, SW, Room 4411, Washington, DC 20201 (e-mail: Richard.Hatchett@hhs.gov).

References

Hide All
1.Dainiak, N, Gent, RN, Carr, Z.Literature review and global consensus on management of acute radiation syndrome affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5:183201.
2.Dainiak, N, Gent, RN, Carr, Z.First global consensus for evidence-based management of the hematopoietic syndrome resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5:202212.
3.Latshaw, MW, Mangal, C, Barkey, A, McNamara, D, Kim, D, Pierson, JB.Public health laboratories and radiological readiness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5:213217.
4.Oliveira, AR, Hunt, JG, Valverde, NJ, Brandão-Mello, CE, Farina, R.Medical and related aspects of the Goiânia accident. Health Phys. 1991;60:2529.
5.Tuttle, RM, Vaisman, F, Tronko, MD.Clinical presentation and clinical outcomes in Chernobyl-related paediatric thyroid cancers: what do we know now? What can we expect in the future? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011;23 (4):268275.
6.Bromet, EJ, Havenaar, JM.Psychological and perceived health effects of the Chernobyl disaster: a 20-year review. Health Phys. 2007;93 (5):516521.
7.Collins, DL.Human responses to the threat of or exposure to ionizing radiation at Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania, and Goiãnia, Brazil. Mil Med. 2002;167 2(Suppl)137138.
8.Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Preparedness to Respond to a Terrorist Nuclear Event. Workshop Report.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
9.National Security Staff Interagency Policy Coordination Subcommittee for Preparedness & Response to Radiological and Nuclear Threats. Planning guidance for response to a nuclear detonation, 2nd ed. http://www.hps.org/hsc/documents/Planning_Guidance_for_Response_to_a_Nuclear_Detonation-2nd_Edition_FINAL.pdf. Published June 2010. Accessed September 5, 2011.
10.Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GEGRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336 (7650):924926.
11.Mueller, J, Stewart, MG.Balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security. Homeland Secur Aff. 2011;7:126.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed