Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline

Abstract

Mass casualty triage is a critical skill. Although many systems exist to guide providers in making triage decisions, there is little scientific evidence available to demonstrate that any of the available systems have been validated. Furthermore, in the United States there is little consistency from one jurisdiction to the next in the application of mass casualty triage methodology. There are no nationally agreed upon categories or color designations. This review reports on a consensus committee process used to evaluate and compare commonly used triage systems, and to develop a proposed national mass casualty triage guideline. The proposed guideline, entitled SALT (sort, assess, life-saving interventions, treatment and/or transport) triage, was developed based on the best available science and consensus opinion. It incorporates aspects from all of the existing triage systems to create a single overarching guide for unifying the mass casualty triage process across the United States. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2(Suppl 1):S25–S34)

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to E. Brooke Lerner, PhD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226(e-mail: eblerner@mcw.edu).

References

Hide All
1.Hoey, BA, Schwab, CW.Level I center triage and mass casualties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 4222329.
2.Kennedy, K, Aghababian, RV, Gans, L, et alTriage: techniques and applications in decision making. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:136144.
3.Frykberg, ER.Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope? J Trauma. 2002;53:201212.
4.Jenkins, JL, McCarthy, ML, Sauer, LM, et alMass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23:38.
5.Benson, M, Koenig, KL, Schultz, CH.Disaster triage: START, then SAVE—a new method of dynamic triage for victims of a catastrophic earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996;11:117124.
6.Romig, L. The JumpSTART Pediatric MCI Triage Tool. 2008. http://www.jumpstarttriage.com/JumpSTART_and_MCI_Triage.php. Accessed February 10, 2008.
7.Nocera, A, Garner, A.An Australian mass casualty incident triage system for the future based upon triage mistakes of the past: the Homebush triage standard. Aust NZ J Surg. 1999;69:603608.
8.Hines, S, Payne, A, Edmondson, J, et alBombs under London. The EMS response plan that worked. JEMS. 2005;30:5867.
9.Garner, A, Lee, A, Harrison, K, et alComparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38:541548.
10.Hodgetts, T, Hall, J, Maconochie, I, et alPaediatric triage tape. Pre-hospital Immediate Care. 1998;2:155159.
11.Kerby, JD, MacLennan, PA, Burton, JN, et alAgreement between prehospital and emergency department Glasgow coma scores. J Trauma. 2007;63:10261031.
12.Wiseman, DB, Ellenbogen, R, Shaffrey, CI.Triage for the neurosurgeon. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;12:E5 .
13.Coule, P, Dallas, C, James, J, et al, eds. Basic Disaster Life Support (BDLS) Provider Manual. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2003.
14.Carli, P, Telion, C, Baker, D.Terrorism in France. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18:9299.
15.Cook, L.The World Trade Center attack. The paramedic response: an insider's view. Crit Care. 2001;5:301303.
16.Asaeda, G.The day that the START triage system came to a STOP: observations from the World Trade Center disaster. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:255256.
17.Tran, MD, Garner, AA, Morrison, I, et alThe Bali bombing: civilian aeromedical evacuation. Med J Aust. 2003;179:353356.
18.Lee, WH, Chiu, TF, Ng, CJ, et alEmergency medical preparedness and response to a Singapore airliner crash. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:194198.
19.Malik, ZU, Pervez, M, Safdar, A, et alTriage and management of mass casualties in a train accident. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2004;14:108111.
20.Beyersdorf, SR, Nania, JN, Luna, GK.Community medical response to the Fairchild mass casualty event. Am J Surg. 1996;171:467470.
21.Wang, T, Hung, C.Appraisal of field triage in mass casualty incidents in Taipei. Ann Disaster Med. 2005;3:6975.
22.American College of Surgeons Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient: 2006. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2006.
23.Lerner, EB.Studies evaluating current field triage: 1966–2005. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10:303306.
24.Schriger, DL, Baraff, LJ.Capillary refill—is it a useful predictor of hypovolemic states? Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20:601605.
25.Bazarian, JJ, Eirich, MA, Salhanick, SD.The relationship between pre-hospital and emergency department Glasgow coma scale scores. Brain Inj. 2003;17:553560.
26.Meredith, W, Rutledge, R, Hansen, AR, et alField triage of trauma patients based upon the ability to follow commands: a study in 29,573 injured patients. J Trauma. 1995;38:129135.
27.Kahn, C, Schultz, C, Miller, K, et alDoes START triage work? An outcomes-level assessment of use at a mass casualty event. [abstract] Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:S12aS13a.
28.Risavi, BL, Salen, PN, Heller, MB, et alA two-hour intervention using START improves prehospital triage of mass casualty incidents. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001;5:197199.
29.Baez, AA, Sztajnkrycer, MD, Smester, P, et alEffectiveness of a simple Internet-based disaster triage educational tool directed toward Latin-American EMS providers. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9:227230.
30.Sanddal, TL, Loyacono, T, Sanddal, ND.Effect of JumpSTART training on immediate and short-term pediatric triage performance. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20:749753.
31.Kilner, T, Hall, FJ.Triage decisions of United Kingdom police firearms officers using a multiple-casualty scenario paper exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20:4046.
32.Wallis, LA, Carley, S.Validation of the paediatric triage tape. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:4750.
33.Sacco, WJ, Navin, DM, Fiedler, KE, et alPrecise formulation and evidence-based application of resource-constrained triage. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:759770.
34.Sacco, WJ, Navin, DM 2nd Waddell, RK, et alA new resource-constrained triage method applied to victims of penetrating injury. J Trauma. 2007;63:316325.
35.Wallis, LA, Carley, S.Comparison of paediatric major incident primary triage tools. Emerg Med J. 2006;23:475478.
36.Waeckerle, JF.Disaster planning and response. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:815821.
37.Hogan, DE, Waeckerle, JF, Dire, DJ, et alEmergency department impact of the Oklahoma City terrorist bombing. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:160167.
38.Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukuda, A, et alThe Tokyo subway sarin attack: disaster management: I. Community emergency response. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:613617.

Keywords

Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Data and Development of a Proposed National Guideline

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed