Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:28:39.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intention to Return and Perception of the Health Risk Due to Radiation Exposure Among Residents in Tomioka Town, Fukushima Prefecture, Stratified by Gender and Generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Hitomi Matsunaga*
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Makiko Orita
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Yasuyuki Taira
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Takashi Kudo
Affiliation:
Department of Isotope Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Hisayoshi Kondo
Affiliation:
Division of Scientific Data Registry, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
Shunichi Yamashita
Affiliation:
Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
Noboru Takamura
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Hitomi Matsunaga, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Global Health, Medicine and Welfare, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University (e-mail: hmatsu@nagasaki-u.ac.jp).

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to clarify residents’ intentions to return (ITR) to Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture; and their risk perception of the health effects of radiation exposure as stratified by gender and generation.

Methods:

Of almost 8000 residents who were 20 years of age or older and who had lived, prior to the accident, in the zones of Tomioka town where residents were permitted to return, 1860 were included in the analysis. For the analysis, the residents were divided into 4 groups which were stratified by gender and age: older males (over 50 years), young males (20−49 years), older females (over 50 years), and young females (20−49 years).

Results:

ITR was found to be significantly lower in young males, young females, and older females than in older males. Conversely, young and older females had significantly higher levels of anxiety about drinking tap water and consuming food collected in Tomioka town. Young and older females also had greater concerns about adverse health effects on themselves and their offspring due to living in Tomioka town.

Conclusion:

Our results showed that special attention should be paid to younger residents, particularly to young females, with regard to recovery from a nuclear disaster.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters of Japanese Government. Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety: The accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations. Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet website. https://japan.kantei.go.jp/kan/topics/201106/iaea_houkokusho_e.html. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters of Japanese Government. Additional report of the Japanese Government to the IAEA - The accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations (Second Report). Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet Website. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/japanreport120911.pdf#search=%27Additional+report+of+the+Japanese+Government+to+the+IAEA++The+accident+at+TEPCO%27s+Fukushima+Nuclear+Power+Stations+%28Second+Report%29%27. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The Fukushima Daiichi Accident. International Atomic Energy Agency Website. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10962/the-fukushima-daiichi-accident. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Koizumi, A, Harada, KH, Niisoe, T, et al. Preliminary assessment of ecological exposure of adult residents in Fukushima Prefecture to radioactive Cesium through ingestion and inhalation. Environ Health Prev Med. 2012;17:292298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagataki, S, Takamura, N, Kamiya, K, et al. Measurements of individual radiation doses in residents living around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. Radiat Res. 2013;180(5):439447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagataki, S, Takamura, N. A review of the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident: radiation effects on the thyroid and strategies for prevention. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(5):384393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagataki, S, Takamura, N. Radioactive doses - predicted and actual - and likely health effects. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(4):245254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomioka Town Official Site (in Japanese). Tomioka Town. https://www.tomioka-town.jp/oshirase/machi/2029.html. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office, Japan. 2018 White Paper on Aging Society (Overall Version): Current Status and Future Image of Aging. Cabinet Office website (in Japanese). https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2018/html/zenbun/s1_1_1.html. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Orita, M, Hayashida, N, Urata, H, et al. Determinants of the return to home towns after the accident at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant: A case study for the village of Kawauchi. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013;156(3)383385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsunaga, H, Orita, M, Iyama, K, et al. Intention to return to the town of Tomioka in residents, 7 years after the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: A cross-sectional study. J Radiat Res. 2019;60(1):5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Post-Disaster Recovery of a Community’s Public Health, Medical, and Social Services; Board on Health Sciences Policy; Institute of Medicine. Healthy, Resilient, and Sustainable Communities after Disasters: Strategies, Opportunities, and Planning for Recovery. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2015.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, T, Shinozaki, T, Naruse, T, et al. Who was concerned about radiation, food safety, and natural disasters after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima catastrophe? A nationwide cross-sectional survey in 2012. PLoS One. 2014;9(9): e106377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, M, Nakatani, J, Oki, T. Evaluation of Risk Perception and risk-comparison information regarding dietary radionuclides after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, Y, Yabe, H, Yasumura, S, et al. Psychological distress and the perception of radiation risks: The Fukushima Health Management Survey. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(9):598605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugimoto, A, Nomura, S, Masaharu, T, et al. The relationship between media consumption and health-related anxieties after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e65331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshii, H, Saito, H, Kikuchi, S, Ueno, T, Sato, K. Report on maternal anxiety 16 months after the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster: anxiety over radioactivity. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2014;6(6):110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orita, M, Hayashida, N, Nakayama, Y, et al. Bipolarization of Risk Perception about the Health Effects of Radiation in Residents after the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. PLoS One. 2015;10 e0129227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukushima Health Management. Agenda of 25 th reviewing board meeting of Fukushima Health Management Survey (in Japanese). https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal/kenkocyosa-kentoiinkai-25.html. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Takamura, N. Radiation Q&A. Nagasaki University 2016. Atomic Bomb Disease Institute website. http://www-sdc.med.nagasaki-u.ac.jp/abdi/publicity/radiation-qa_e.html. Accessed April 24, 2020.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Matsunaga et al. supplementary material

Matsunaga et al. supplementary material

Download Matsunaga et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.3 KB