Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

High- or low-technology measurements of energy expenditure in clinical gait analysis?

  • Roslyn Boyd (a1), Stefania Fatone (a1), Jill Rodda (a1), Christine Olesch (a2), Roland Starr (a1), Elise Cullis (a1), Donnacha Gallagher (a1), John B Carlin (a3), Gary R Nattrass (a4) and Kerr Graham (a1)...

Abstract

The repeatability of energy-expenditure measurements were studied in five children and four adults without disabilities using the Cosmed K4 (high technology). The ability to detect change in measurements was compared between this instrument and the Physiological Cost Index (PCI; low technology). The results of repeatability (95% range) for oxygen cost were 13.1% in children and 13% in adults. In contrast, the SD of PCI was 6 to 72% of the mean in adults and wider in children (91%; 95% range). The validity of PCI as an outcome measure was questioned. In addition, 177 children with motor disability were prospectively studied using the Cosmed K4. Previous experience with the Cosmed K2 (intermediate technology) helped to develop a practical and repeatable protocol for testing children with disability using the Cosmed K4. The protocol commenced with 5 minutes of rest to achieve baseline values of heart rate and oxygen consumption, followed by 10 minutes of continuous walking at a self-selected speed on a 10-metre level oval walking track. The test concluded with 5 minutes of rest to monitor the return to baseline values. Ninety-one percent of the children with disability quickly reached a steady-state of oxygen consumption and carbon-dioxide production. The carbon-dioxide sensor in the Cosmed K4 has enabled a new group of severely involved children with cerebral palsy (9%) to be defined. These children have been termed ‘physiologically marginal ambulators’.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia. E-mail: boydr@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

High- or low-technology measurements of energy expenditure in clinical gait analysis?

  • Roslyn Boyd (a1), Stefania Fatone (a1), Jill Rodda (a1), Christine Olesch (a2), Roland Starr (a1), Elise Cullis (a1), Donnacha Gallagher (a1), John B Carlin (a3), Gary R Nattrass (a4) and Kerr Graham (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.