Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:18:09.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioural treatment of urinary incontinence and encopresis in children with learning disabilities: transfer of stimulus control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

Linda Smith
Affiliation:
Newcastle City Health NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Paul Smith
Affiliation:
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, North Tyneside, UK.
Susan Kwok Yi Lee
Affiliation:
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, North Tyneside, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Urinary and faecal incontinence present a considerable problem in people with learning disabilities, despite the general effectiveness of behavioural techniques in continence training. Children with learning disabilities and obsessional behaviour may be particularly resistant to toilet training, even where relatively cognitively able, and often despite a substantial degree of control over their eliminatory functions. Their resistance may be more appropriately regarded as a challenging behaviour and their incontinence better explained by factors other than a simple failure to learn. A ‘stimulus-control’ hypothesis proposes that the child's nappy (diaper)/potty/underwear has developed strong stimulus control over the elimination response. This report describes three case studies in which treatment-resistant children, aged between 8 and 12 years, with mild or moderate learning disabilities, were successfully treated for nappy-dependent nocturnal encopresis or diurnal urinary incontinence. The children were routine case referrals for whom previous attempts to train bowel or bladder control had failed. Behavioural techniques, such as ‘shaping’ (gradually increasing the proximity to the toilet), ‘fading’ (reducing the presence of the nappy), and rewards for eliminating, effected successful transfer of stimulus control over elimination from nappy to toilet. Treatment times varied, depending on the degree of the child's obsession and resistance to change.

Type
Case Reports
Copyright
© 2000 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)