Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:00:36.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Thomas J. Dishion ,
Deborah Capaldi ,
Kathleen M. Spracklen  and
Fuzhong Li
Thomas J. Dishion*
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
Deborah Capaldi
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
Kathleen M. Spracklen
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
Fuzhong Li
Affiliation:
Oregon Social Learning Center
*
Thomas J. Dishion Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 East 5th Avenue, Suite 202, Eugene, OR 97401.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This report represents the perspective that adolescent substance use is best understood as an adaptation to an ecology defined jointly by families and peers. Hypotheses were tested on a sample of 206 boys in the Oregon Youth Study. The analyses proceeded in four steps. First, it was found that the transition from middle to high school was a period of rapid growth in smoking for boys with a prior history of low sociometric status. Second, a structural equation model was tested showing that deviant peer association in early adolescence mediated the relation between peer and family experiences in middle childhood and later substance use. Third, an observational study of the boys with their best friends revealed that active support for rule breaking and substance use was associated with immediate escalation in substance use during the transition to high school. Finally, it was found that ineffective parental monitoring practices were highly associated with the boy's involvement in a deviant peer network. In fact, a high degree of similarity was found between boys and their best friends for substance use when parental monitoring was low. These analyses show that substance use in adolescence is embedded within the proximal peer environment, which in turn, emerges and is amplified within a context of low adult involvement and monitoring.

Type
Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 7 , Issue 4: Developmental Processes in Peer Relations and Psychopathology , Fall 1995 , pp. 803 - 824
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achcnbach, T. M. (1992). New developments in multiaxial empirically based assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. In Rosen, J. C. & McReynolds, P. (Eds.). Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 75–102), New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.Google Scholar
Anthony, J. C., & Petronis, K. R. (in press). Earlyonset drug use and risk of later drug problems. American Journal of Public Health.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1985). Familial antecedents of adolescent drug use: A developmental perspective. In Jones, C. L. & Battjes, R. J. (Eds.), Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention (pp. 13–44). (DHHS Publication No. ADM 87–1335). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1959). EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and by design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In Vasta, R. (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D., & Patterson, G. R. (1987). An approach to the problem of recruitment and retention rates for longitudinal research. Behavioral Assessment, 9. 169–177.Google Scholar
Capaldi, D., & Patterson, G. R. (1989). Psychometric properties of fourteen latent constructs from the Oregon Youth Study. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., & Herbencr, E. S. (1990). Continuity and change: Assortive marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilcoate, H., Anthony, J., & Dishion, T. J. (1995). Parent monitoring and the incidence of drug sampling in multiethnic urban children. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (1990). An historical perspective on the discipline of developmental psychopathology. In Rolf, J., Masten, A., Cicchetti, D., Nuechterlein, K., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.), Risk protective factors in development of psychopathology (pp. 2–28). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1992). The role of developmental theory in prevention and intervention. Development and Psychology, 4, 489–493.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1983). A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys groups. Child Development, 54, 1400–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field sellings. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 588–598.Google ScholarPubMed
Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J. (1990). Family ecology of boys' peer relations in middle childhood. Child Development, 61, 874–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., & Andrews, D. W. (in press). A multicomponent intervention for families of young adolescents at risk: An analysis of short-term outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Adolescent boys and their friends in adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional processes. Child Development, 66, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., Patterson, G. R., & Poe, J. (1995). A process analysis of confluence in antisocial behavior in male adolescent friendships. Unpublished manuscript, Oregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
Dishon, T. J., Brown, G., zhu, Y., & Spracklen, K. 1995). Short-and long-term effectiveness of parent and teen interventions on substance use among high-risk youth. Manuscript in preparation, Oregon; Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., capaldi, D., & Yoerger, K. (1994). Antecedents of adolescent substance use in males. Manuscript in preparation, Oregon Social Learning Center.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., French, D. C., & Patterson, G. R. (in press). The development and ecology of child antisocial behavior. In Cicchetti, D. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Manual of developmental psychopathology New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Loeber, R. (1985). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: The role of parents and peers revisited. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 11, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptation in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In Huesmann, L. R. (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 61–95). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., Capaldi, D. M., Forgatch, M. S., & McCarthy, S. (1984 a). Child telephone interview. (Available from OSLC, 207 E. 5th Suite 202, Eugene, OR 97401).Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., Capaldi, D. M., Forgatch, M. S., & McCarthy, S. (1984 b). Parent telephone interview. (Available from OSLC, 207 E. 5th Suite 202, Eugene, OR 97401).Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents: A peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Rogoff, B., & Cromer, C. (1981). Age segregation in children's interactions. Developmental Psychology, 17, 399–407.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. S., Lichenstein, E., & Biglan, A. (1985). Smoking onset among teens: An empirical analysis of initial situations. Addictive Behaviors, 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottfredson, D. (1990). Changing school structures to benefit high-risk youth. In Leone, P. (Ed.), Understanding troubled and troubling youth: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 123–135). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1989). Theoretical and relationship approaches. In Vasta, R. (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 251–285). London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1986). Relating childhood relationships to individual characteristics. In Hartup, W. W. & Rubin, Z. (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 27–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jessor, R. (1976). Predicting time of onset of marijuana use: A developmental study of high school youth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 125–134.Google ScholarPubMed
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1975). Adolescent development and the onset of drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1986). Mainstreaming and cooperative learning strategies. Exceptional Children, 52, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, D. B. (1973). Adolescent marijuana use: Role of parents and peers. Science, 181, 1067–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1986). Process of peer influence on adolescence. In Silbereisen, R. K. (Ed.), Development as action in context (pp. 33–52). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kandel, D. B., Davies, M., Karus, D., & Yamaguchi, K. (1986). The consequences in young adulthood of adolescent drug involvement. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 746–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, H. B. (1978). Deviant behavior and selfenhancement in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 253–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellam, S. G. (1990). Developmental epidemiological framework for family research on depression and aggression. In Patterson, G. R. (Ed.), Depression and aggression in family interaction (pp. 11–48). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Rubin, B. R., & Ensminger, M. E. (1983). Paths leading to teenage psychiatric symptoms and substance use: Developmental epidemiological studies in Woodlawn. In Guze, S. R., Earns, F. J., & Barrett, J. E. (Eds.), Childhood psychopathology and development (pp. 17–51). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, D., Stattin, H., & Allen, D. L. (1985). Biological maturation and social development: A longitudinal study of some adjustment processes from mid-adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, M. D. (1992). Understanding the multidimensional nature of drug use and abuse: The role of consumption, risk factors, and protective factors. In Glantz, M. & Pickens, R. (Eds.), Vulnerability to drug abuse (pp. 255–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 385–394.Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1986). Maternal rejection: Determinant or product for deviant child behavior? In Hartup, W. & Rubin, Z. (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 73–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Bank, L. (1985). Bootstrapping your way in the nomological thicket. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 49–73.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Bank, L. (1987). When is a nomological network a construct? In Peterson, D. R. & Fishman, D. B. (Eds.), Assessment for decision (pp. 249–279). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1985). Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology, 23, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development, 55, 1299–1307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peery, J. C. (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50, 1231–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, J., Dishion, T. J., Griesler, P., & Andrews, D. W. (1990). Topic code. Unpublished code manual, Oregon Social Learning Center, 207 East 5th Avenue, Suite 202, Eugene, OR 97401.Google Scholar
Reid, J. B. (Ed.). (1978). A social learning approach to family intervention: II. Observation in home settings. Eugene, OR: Castalia Press.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., & Przybeck, T. R. (1985). Age of onset of drug use as a factor in drug and other disorders. In Jones, C. L. & Battjes, R. J. (Eds.), Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention (Research Monograph No. 56) (pp. 178–193). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (1989). Commentary: General systems and the regulation of development. In Gunnar, M. R. & Thelen, E. (Eds.), Systems and development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 219–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1994). Urban poverty and the family context of delinquency: A new look at structure and process in a classic study. Child Development, 65, 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype to environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google ScholarPubMed
Simmons, R. G., Burgeson, R., & Reef, M. J. (1988). Cumulative change at entry to adolescence. In Gunnar, M. R. & Collins, W. A. (Eds.), Development during the transition to adolescence: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (pp. 123–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., & Fogg, C. P. (1979). Psychological antecedents of teenage drug use. Research in Community Mental Health, 1, 87–102.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. (1986). Latchkey children and susceptibility to peer pressure: An ecological analysis. Developmental Psychology, 22, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar