Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Insensitive parenting may accelerate the development of the amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex circuit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Sandra Thijssen
Affiliation:
Leiden University Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
Ryan L. Muetzel
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
Affiliation:
Leiden University
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam
Henning Tiemeier
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam
Frank C. Verhulst
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam
Tonya White
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam
Marinus H. Van Ijzendoorn
Affiliation:
Leiden University Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This study examined whether the association between age and amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) connectivity in typically developing 6- to 10-year-old children is correlated with parental care. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired from 124 children of the Generation R Study who at 4 years old had been observed interacting with their parents to assess maternal and paternal sensitivity. Amygdala functional connectivity was assessed using a general linear model with the amygdalae time series as explanatory variables. Higher level analyses assessing Sensitivity × Age as well as exploratory Sensitivity × Age × Gender interaction effects were performed restricted to voxels in the mPFC. We found significant Sensitivity × Age interaction effects on amygdala–mPFC connectivity. Age was related to stronger amygdala–mPFC connectivity in children with a lower combined parental sensitivity score (b = 0.11, p = .004, b = 0.06, p = .06, right and left amygdala, respectively), but not in children with a higher parental sensitivity score, (b = –0.07, p = .12, b = –0.06, p = .12, right and left amygdala, respectively). A similar effect was found for maternal sensitivity, with stronger amygdala–mPFC connectivity in children with less sensitive mothers. Exploratory (parental, maternal, paternal) Sensitivity × Age × Gender interaction analyses suggested that this effect was especially pronounced in girls. Amygdala-mPFC resting-state functional connectivity has been shown to increase from age 10.5 years onward, implying that the positive association between age and amygdala–mPFC connectivity in 6- to 10-year-old children of less sensitive parents represents accelerated development of the amygdala–mPFC circuit.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Center in close collaboration with the Erasmus University Rotterdam, School of Law and Faculty of Social Sciences; the Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam; the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation, Rotterdam; and the Stichting Trombosedienst & Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond (STAR), Rotterdam. The first phase of the Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam; Erasmus University, Rotterdam; the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; and the Ministry of Youth and Families. In addition, this study is financially supported through ZonMw TOP project number 91211021 (to T.W.). Henning Tiemer, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, and Marinus H. van IJzendoorn were supported by research awards from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (H.T., VIDI grant; M.H.v.I., SPINOZA prize; M.J.B.K., VICI grant), and by the Gravitation program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (Grant 024.001.003). Bakermans-Kranenburg was also supported by the European Research Council (ERC AdG).

References

Ainsworth, M. D., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 4967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, M. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development: “Socialization” as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In Richards, M. P. M. (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (pp. 99135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akirav, I., & Maroun, M. (2007). The role of the medial prefrontal cortex-amygdala circuit in stress effects on the extinction of fear. Neural Plasticity, 2007, 30873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alarcon, G., Cservenka, A., Rudolph, M. D., Fair, D. A., & Nagel, B. J. (2015). Developmental sex differences in resting state functional connectivity of amygdala sub-regions. NeuroImage, 115, 235244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Pijlman, F. T., Mesman, J., & Juffer, F. (2008). Experimental evidence for differential susceptibility: Dopamine D4 receptor polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates intervention effects on toddlers’ externalizing behavior in a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology, 44, 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banihashemi, L., Sheu, L. K., Midei, A. J., & Gianaros, P. J. (2015). Childhood physical abuse predicts stressor-evoked activity within central visceral control regions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 474485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Ruttle, P. L., Boyce, W. T., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2015). Early adversity, elevated stress physiology, accelerated sexual maturation, and poor health in females. Developmental Psychology, 51, 816822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy—An evolutionary-theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., Deschenes, M., & Matte-Gagne, C. (2012). Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: A closer look at the caregiving environment. Developmental Science, 15, 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birn, R. M., Molloy, E. K., Patriat, R., Parker, T., Meier, T. B., Kirk, G. R., … Prabhakaran, V. (2013). The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates. NeuroImage, 83, 550558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, K. A., Brooker, R. J., & Leuty, M. (2008). Girls most of the time, boys some of the time: Gender differences in toddlers’ use of maternal proximity and comfort seeking. Infancy, 13, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, B. L., & Richardson, R. (2011). Maternal separation results in early emergence of adult-like fear and extinction learning in infant rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 125, 2028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaghan, B. L., & Tottenham, N. (2016a). The neuro-environmental loop of plasticity: A cross-species analysis of parental effects on emotion circuitry development following typical and adverse caregiving. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41, 163176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaghan, B. L., & Tottenham, N. (2016b). The stress acceleration hypothesis: Eeffects of early-life adversity on emotion circuits and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 7, 7681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (2016). Developmental psychopathology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conner, O. L., Siegle, G. J., McFarland, A. M., Silk, J. S., Ladouceur, C. D., Dahl, R. E., Coan, J. A., & Ryan, N. D. (2012). Mom—It helps when you're right here! Attenuation of neural stress markers in anxious youths whose caregivers are present during fMRI. PLOS ONE, 7, e50680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dannlowski, U., Kugel, H., Huber, F., Stuhrmann, A., Redlich, R., Grotegerd, D., … Suslow, T. (2013). Childhood maltreatment is associated with an automatic negative emotion processing bias in the amygdala. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 28992909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Decety, J., Michalska, K. J., & Kinzler, K. D. (2012). The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: A neurodevelopmental study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 209220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dozier, M., Peloso, E., Lewis, E., Laurenceau, J. P., & Levine, S. (2008). Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 845859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egeland, B., Erickson, M. F., Clemenhagen-Moon, J., Hiester, M. K., & Korfmacher, J. (1990). 24 Months tool coding manual. Project STEEP—Revised 1990 from mother-child project scales. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Schlomer, G. L., Tilley, E. H., & Butler, E. A. (2012). Impact of fathers on risky sexual behavior in daughters: A genetically and environmentally controlled sibling study. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 317332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fearon, R. M. P., Groh, A. M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Roisman, G. I. (2016). Attachment and developmental psychopathology. In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 325384). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Forbes, C. E., & Grafman, J. (2010). The role of the human pefrontal cortex in social cognition and moral judgment. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 299324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, J. A., Chiu, S. F., Breeze, J. L., Makris, N., Lange, N., Kennedy, D. N., … Biederman, J. (2005). Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of limbic and thalamic volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 12561265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabard-Durnam, L. J., Flannery, J., Goff, B., Gee, D. G., Humphreys, K. L., Telzer, E., … Tottenham, N. (2014). The development of human amygdala functional connectivity at rest from 4 to 23 years: A cross-sectional study. NeuroImage, 95, 193207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gee, D. G., Gabard-Durnam, L. J., Flannery, J., Goff, B., Humphreys, K. L., Telzer, E. H., … Tottenham, N. (2013). Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 1563815643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gee, D. G., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., … Tottenham, N. (2013). A developmental shift from positive to negative connectivity in human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 45844593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giedd, J. N., Vaituzis, A. C., Hamburger, S. D., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Kaysen, D., … Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: Ages 4–18 years. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 366, 223230.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffanti, L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Beckmann, C. F., Auerbach, E. J., Douaud, G., Sexton, C. E., … Smith, S. M. (2014). ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. NeuroImage, 95, 232247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guyer, A. E., Monk, C. S., McClure-Tone, E. B., Nelson, E. E., Roberson-Nay, R., Adler, A. D., … Ernst, M. (2008). A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 15651582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, A., Stein, P., Windischberger, C., Weissenbacher, A., Spindelegger, C., Moser, E., … Lanzenberger, R. (2011). Reduced resting-state functional connectivity between amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in social anxiety disorder. NeuroImage, 56, 881889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hariri, A. R., Mattay, V. S., Tessitore, A., Fera, F., & Weinberger, D. R. (2003). Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 494501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensch, T. K. (2004). Critical period regulation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 549579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochberg, Z., & Belsky, J. (2013). Evo-devo of human adolescence: Beyond disease models of early puberty. BMC Medicine, 11, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hostinar, C. E., Johnson, A. E., & Gunnar, M. R. (2015). Early social deprivation and the social buffering of cortisol stress responses in late childhood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1597–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaddoe, V. W., van Duijn, C. M., Franco, O. H., van der Heijden, A. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., de Jongste, J. C., … Hofman, A. (2012). The Generation R Study: Design and cohort update 2012. European Journal of Epidemiology, 27, 739756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012). FSL. NeuroImage, 62, 782790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kok, R., Linting, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Hofman, A., Verhulst, F. C., & Tiemeier, H. (2013). Maternal sensitivity and internalizing problems: Evidence from two longitudinal studies in early childhood. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44, 751765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kok, R., Thijssen, S., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verhulst, F. C., White, T., … Tiemeier, H. (2015). Normal variation in early parental sensitivity predicts child structural brain development. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54, 824831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kok, R., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Linting, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Tharner, A., Luijk, M. P. C. M., … Tiemeier, H. (2013). Attachment insecurity predicts child active resistance to parental requests in a compliance task. Child Care Health and Development, 39, 277287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucassen, N., Kok, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Hofman, A., … Tiemeier, H. (2015). Executive functions in early childhood: The role of maternal and paternal parenting practices. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 489505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., & Burdette, J. H. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage, 19, 12331239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, L. G., Davies, P. T., & Cicchetti, D. (2014). Interparental violence and childhood adjustment: How and why maternal sensitivity is a protective factor. Child Development, 85, 22632278.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehta, M. A., Golembo, N. I., Nosarti, C., Colvert, E., Mota, A., Williams, S. C. R., … Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2009). Amygdala, hippocampal and corpus callosum size following severe early institutional deprivation: The English and Romanian Adoptees Study Pilot. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 943951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. K. (2002). The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Perception, 31, 104.Google Scholar
Moriceau, S., & Sullivan, R. M. (2006). Maternal presence serves as a switch between learning fear and attraction in infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 10041006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moutsiana, C., Johnstone, T., Murray, L., Fearon, P., Cooper, P. J., Pliatsikas, C., … Halligan, S. L. (2015). Insecure attachment during infancy predicts greater amygdala volumes in early adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 540548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muetzel, R. L., Blanken, L. M. E., Thijssen, S., van der Lugt, A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verhulst, F. C., … White, T. (2016). Resting-state networks in 6-to-10 year old children. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 42864300. doi:10.1002/hbm.23309 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutlu, A. K., Schneider, M., Debbane, M., Badoud, D., Eliez, S., & Schaer, M. (2013). Sex differences in thickness, and folding developments throughout the cortex. NeuroImage, 82, 200207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, C. A., Fox, N. A., & Zeanah, C. H. (2014). Romania's abandoned children: Deprivation, brain development, and the struggle for recovery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. K., Laible, D., Carlo, G., Steele, J. S., & McGinley, M. (2014). Do sensitive parents foster kind children, or vice versa? Bidirectional influences between children's prosocial behavior and parental sensitivity. Developmental Psychology, 50, 18081816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 9, e1001349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Rethinking feelings: An fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 12151229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsavsky, A. K., Telzer, E. H., Shapiro, M., Humphreys, K. L., Flannery, J., Goff, B., & Tottenham, N. (2013). Indiscriminate amygdala response to mothers and strangers after early maternal deprivation. Biological Psychiatry, 74, 853860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlman, S. B., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2011). Developing connections for affective regulation: Age-related changes in emotional brain connectivity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 607620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, K. L., Fitzgerald, D. A., Nathan, P. J., Moore, G. J., Uhde, T. W., & Tancer, M. E. (2005). Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 210219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, E. A., & LeDoux, J. E. (2005). Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron, 48, 175187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philip, N. S., Sweet, L. H., Tyrka, A. R., Price, L. H., Bloom, R. F., & Carpenter, L. L. (2013). Decreased default network connectivity is associated with early life stress in medication-free healthy adults. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 23, 2432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage, 59, 21422154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiroga, A., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., & Moreno, A. (2015). Psychological consequences of collective violence in childhood: The case of Monterrey, Mexico. Estudios De Psicologia, 36, 294315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, J., Stevens, G. W. J. M., van der Ende, J., Hofman, A., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Mackenbach, J. P., … Tiemeier, H. (2013). Economic disadvantage and young children's emotional and behavioral problems: Mechanisms of risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 125137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Douaud, G., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Griffanti, L., & Smith, S. M. (2014). Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. NeuroImage, 15, 449468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, C. E., Richards, J. E., & Almli, C. R. (2012). Age-specific MRI templates for pediatric neuroimaging. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37, 379399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satterthwaite, T. D., Wolf, D. H., Loughead, J., Ruparel, K., Elliott, M. A., Hakonarson, H., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2012). Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. NeuroImage, 60, 623632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., … Giedd, J. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, P., Kabani, N. J., Lerch, J. P., Eckstrand, K., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., … Wise, S. P. (2008). Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 35863594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sroufe, L. A. (1990). Considering normal and abnormal together: The essence of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 335347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, P. J., Winkel, M., Wijnberg-Williams, B., & Laros, J. A. (2005). Snijders-Oomen Niet-Verbale Intelligentietest: SON-R 2 1/2−7. Amsterdam: Boom Testuitgevers.Google Scholar
Tiemeier, H., Velders, F. P., Szekely, E., Roza, S. J., Dieleman, G., Jaddoe, V. W., … Verhulst, F. C. (2012). The Generation R Study: A review of design, findings to date, and a study of the 5-HTTLPR by environmental interaction from fetal life onward. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 11191135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottenham, N. (2015). Social scaffolding of human amygdala–mPFC circuit development. Social Neuroscience, 10, 489499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottenham, N., Hare, T. A., Quinn, B. T., McCarry, T. W., Nurse, M., Gilhooly, T., … Casey, B. J. (2010). Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Developmental Science, 13, 4661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, J. D., Torrisi, S. J., Lieberman, M. D., Sugar, C. A., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Altshuler, L. L. (2013). Frontal-amygdala connectivity alterations during emotion downregulation in bipolar I disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 73, 127135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Voort, A., Linting, M., Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Schoenmaker, C., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2014). The development of adolescents’ internalizing behavior: Longitudinal effects of maternal sensitivity and child inhibition. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 43, 528540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., & Poelhuis, C. W. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and nonadopted children's IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T., El Marroun, H., Nijs, I., Schmidt, M., van der Lugt, A., Wielopolki, P. A., … Verhulst, F. C. (2013). Pediatric population-based neuroimaging and the Generation R Study: The intersection of developmental neuroscience and epidemiology. European Journal of Epidemiology, 28, 99111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T., Muetzel, R., Schmidt, M., Langeslag, S. J., Jaddoe, V., Hofman, A., … Tiemeier, H. (2014). Time of acquisition and network stability in pediatric resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Connectivity, 4, 417427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, S., Simmons, J. G., Dennison, M., Vijayakumar, N., Schwartz, O., Yap, M. B. H., … Allen, N. B. (2014). Positive parenting predicts the development of adolescent brain structure: A longitudinal study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, S., Yap, M. B. H., Yucel, M., Sheeber, L., Simmons, J. G., Pantelis, C., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Maternal responses to adolescent positive affect are associated with adolescents’ reward neuroanatomy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 247256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, R. Y., Song, Z. Z., Wang, S. Y., Shui, L., Tai, F. D., Qiao, X. F., & He, F. Q. (2014). Early paternal deprivation alters levels of hippocarnpal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glucocorticold receptor and serum corticosterone and adrenocorticotropin in a sex-specific way in socially monogamous mandarin voles. Neuroendocrinology, 100, 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, P., An, S. C., Tai, F. D., Zhang, X., He, F. Q., Wang, J. L., … Wu, R. Y. (2012). The effects of neonatal paternal deprivation on pair bonding, NAcc dopamine receptor mRNA expression and serum corticosterone in mandarin voles. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 669677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 182194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 82
Total number of PDF views: 615 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th April 2017 - 19th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-kstv4 Total loading time: 0.297 Render date: 2021-01-19T09:25:37.093Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Tue Jan 19 2021 09:05:30 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Insensitive parenting may accelerate the development of the amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex circuit
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Insensitive parenting may accelerate the development of the amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex circuit
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Insensitive parenting may accelerate the development of the amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex circuit
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *