Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?

  • Lorenzo Maccioni (a1), Yuri Borgianni (a1) and Daniela C. A. Pigosso (a2)

Abstract

Despite the potential to lead to enhanced environmental performance, the extent to which eco-design leads to success is still unclear. In order to lay bare the effects of eco-design implementation, this paper focuses on understanding the correlations between specific eco-design principles and success through an exploratory study. A sample of 178 products, characterized in terms of their success levels and implemented eco-design principles, was statistically analyzed. The results indicate a number of positive correlations for principles that tend to favor success (e.g. intensified use and product/service systems) and negative correlations for principles that tend to moderate the chances of success (e.g. minimize packaging). Although the mechanisms that cause this phenomenon should be further investigated, the findings can provide designers with additional recommendations for the selection of eco-design principles.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: yuri.borgianni@unibz.it

References

Hide All
Altavilla, S. & Montagna, F. 2018 When lifecycle cost analysis enables strategic design considerations. In DS92: Proceedings of DESIGN 2018. 15th International Design Conference, pp. 953964. Design Society; doi:10.21278/idc.2018.0334.
Altshuller, G. S. 1984 Creativity as an Exact Science. Gordon and Breach; doi:10.1201/9781466593442.
Avery, G. 2005 Leadership for Sustainable Futures: Achieving Success in a Competitive World. Edward Elgar Publishing; doi:10.4337/9781845425494.
Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P. & Jaskiewicz, T. 2017 Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: a process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of Cleaner Production 147, 175186; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.081.
Belz, F.-M. & Peattie, K. J. 2009 Sustainability Marketing: A Global Perspective. Wiley.
Bender, B. & Marion, S. 2016 Dimensions of product development success. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016/14th International Design Conference, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 16–19, 2016, pp. 14551464. The Design Society.
Bertoni, M. 2017 Introducing sustainability in value models to support design decision making: a systematic review. Sustainability 9 (6), 994; doi:10.3390/su9060994.
Bhamra, T. & Lofthouse, T. 2007 Design or Sustainability. A Practical Approach. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P. & Evans, S. 2014 A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production 65, 4256; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J. & Wagner, M. 2013 Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production 45, 18; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013.
Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., Pucillo, F. & Rotini, F. 2013 Supporting product design by anticipating the success chances of new value profiles. Computers in Industry 64, 421435; doi:10.1016/j.compind.2013.02.004.
Bovea, M. & Pérez-Belis, V. 2012 A taxonomy of eco-design tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. Journal of Cleaner Production 20, 6171; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012.
Carvalho, S. W., Silvestre, B. & Cunningham, P. 2017 Hitting the nail on the head! insight into consumer assessment of sustainability-related innovations. Long Range Planning 50 (6), 741755; doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2016.08.001.
Ceschin, F. & Gaziulusoy, I. 2016 Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies 47, 118163; doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.
Ceschin, F., Vezzoli, C. & Zhang, J. 2010 Sustainability in design: now! Challenges and opportunities for design research, education and practice in the XXI century. In Proceedings of the LeNS Conference, Bangalore, India, September 29–October 1, 2010.
Chouinard, Y., Ellison, J. & Ridgeway, R. 2011 The sustainable economy. Harvard Business Review 89, 5262.
Christensen, B. T., Kristensen, T. & Reber, R. 2015 Contributions of consumer-perceived creativity and beauty to willingness-to-pay for design products. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 3, 164176; doi:10.1080/21650349.2014.981216.
Clark, G., Kosoris, J., Hong, L. N. & Crul, M. 2009 Design for sustainability: current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 1, 409424; doi:10.3390/su1030409.
Cluzel, F., Yannou, B., Millet, D. & Leroy, Y. 2016 Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, 43294343; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.002.
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. 1987 Success factors in product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 16, 215223; doi:10.1016/0019-8501(87)90029-0.
Crul, M. & Diehl, J. C. 2010 Design for sustainability: Moving from incremental towards radical design approaches. In Transitions to Sustainability, NZSSES Conference, Auckland, New Zeeland. New Zealand Society for Sustainability Engineering and Science.
da Cunha Rodovalho, E., Lima, H. M. & De Tomi, G. 2016 New approach for reduction of diesel consumption by comparing different mining haulage configurations. Journal of Environmental Management 172, 177185; doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.048.
Dangelico, R. M. 2017 What drives green product development and how do different antecedents affect market performance? A survey of Italian companies with eco-labels. Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (8), 11441161; doi:10.1002/bse.1975.
Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D. & Pontrandolfo, P. 2017 Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: a sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 26, 490506; doi:10.1002/bse.1932.
D’Anna, W. & Cascini, G. 2016 Adding quality of life to design for Eco-Efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, 32113221; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.109.
De Medeiros, J. F., Ribeiro, J. L. D. & Cortimiglia, M. N. 2014 Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 65, 7686; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.035.
Dinter, B. 2013 Success factors for information logistics strategy—An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems 54, 12071218; doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.09.001.
Fellnhofer, K. 2017 Drivers of innovation success in sustainable businesses. Journal of Cleaner Production 167, 15341545; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.197.
Figge, F. & Hahn, T. 2004 Sustainable Value Added – measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics 48, 173187; doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005.
Fiksel, J. 2009 Design for Environment. A Guide to Sustainable Product Development, 2nd edn. McGraw–Hill.
França, C. L., Broman, G., Robèrt, K. H., Basile, G. & Trygg, L. 2017 An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production 140, 155166; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.124.
Genç, E. & Di Benedetto, C. A. 2015 Cross-functional integration in the sustainable new product development process: the role of the environmental specialist. Industrial Marketing Management 50, 150161; doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.001.
Glavič, P. & Lukman, R. 2007 Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production 15, 18751885; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006.
Gotzsch, J. 2008 Key aspects of product attraction: a focus on eco-friendliness. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management 8, 3752; doi:10.1504/IJETM.2008.016297.
Goucher-Lambert, K. & Cagan, J. 2015 The impact of sustainability on consumer preference judgments of product attributes. Journal of Mechanical Design 137, 081401; doi:10.1115/1.4030271.
Griffin, A. & Page, A. L. 1996 PDMA success measurement project: recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13, 478496; doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1360478.
de Groot, A. D. 2014 The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han LJ van der Maas]. Acta psychologica 148, 188194; doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001.
Haase, R. P., Pigosso, D. C. & McAloone, T. C. 2017 Product/service-system origins and trajectories: a systematic literature review of PSS definitions and their characteristics. Procedia CIRP 64, 157162; doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.053.
Haig, M. 2011 Brand Failures. Kogan Page.
Halila, F. & Rundquist, J. 2011 The development and market success of eco-innovations: a comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations in Sweden. European Journal of Innovation Management 14 (3), 278302; doi:10.1108/14601061111148807.
Hart, S. 1993 Dimensions of success in new product development: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing Management 9, 2341; doi:10.1080/0267257X.1993.9964215.
Hernandez, N. V., Schmidt, L. C., Kremer, G. O. & Lin, C. Y. 2014 An empirical study of the effectiveness of selected cognitive aids on multiple design tasks. Design Computing and Cognition 12, 227246; doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_13.
Hoffmann, E. 2017 User Integration in Sustainable Product Development: Organisational Learning through Boundary-Spanning Processes. Routledge.
Isaksson, O., Bertoni, M., Hallstedt, S. & Lavesson, N. 2015 Model based decision support for value and sustainability in product development. In Proceedings of ICED 15/20th International Conference on Engineering Design, Milan, Italy, July 27–30, 2015. The Design Society.
Issa, I. I., Pigosso, D. C., McAloone, T. C. & Rozenfeld, H. 2015 Leading product-related environmental performance indicators: a selection guide and database. Journal of Cleaner Production 108, 321330; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.088.
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jugend, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Gunasekaran, A. & Latan, H. 2015 Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production 87, 442451; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.036.
Johansson, G. 2002 Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development: a review of state of the art. Environmental Management and Health 13, 98107; doi:10.1108/09566160210417868.
Karlsson, C. 2016 Research Methods for Operations Management. Routledge.
Kieckhäfer, K., Wachter, K. & Spengler, T. S. 2017 Analyzing manufacturers’ impact on green products’ market diffusion – the case of electric vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, S11S25; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.021.
Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. A. 2014 Blue Ocean Strategy, Expanded Edition: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press.
Klewitz, J. & Hansen, E. G. 2014 Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 65, 5775; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017.
Laszlo, C. & Cescau, P. 2017 Sustainable Value: How the World’s Leading Companies are Doing Well by Doing Good. Routledge.
Liedtke, C., Baedeker, C., Hasselkuß, M., Rohn, H. & Grinewitschus, V. 2015 User-integrated innovation in Sustainable LivingLabs: an experimental infrastructure for researching and developing sustainable product service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 97, 106116; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.070.
Lofthouse, V. & Prendeville, S. 2018 Human-centred design of products and services for the circular economy – a review. The Design Journal (in press); doi:10.1080/14606925.2018.1468169.
Luchs, M. G., Brower, J. & Chitturi, R. 2012 Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (6), 903916; doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00970.x.
Maccioni, L. & Borgianni, Y. 2018 A product success scale for supporting research in engineering design. In International Design Conference. Section Design Theory and Research Methodology, pp. 6980. Design Society; doi:10.21278/idc.2018.0494.
Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y. & Basso, D. 2019 Value perception of green products: an exploratory study combining conscious answers and unconscious behavioral aspects. Sustainability 11, 1226; doi:10.3390/su11051226.
MacDonald, E. F. & She, J. 2015 Seven cognitive concepts for successful eco-design. Journal of Cleaner Production 92, 2336; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.096.
Machado, R. B. 2016 Design management and business success: the emerging connection. Design Management Review 27, 4449; doi:10.1111/drev.12009.
Maidique, M. A. & Zirger, B. J. 1985 The new product learning cycle. Research Policy 14, 299313; doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90001-0.
Mattson, C. A., Pack, A. T., Lofthouse, V. & Bhamra, T. 2019 Using a product’s sustainability space as a design exploration tool. Design Science 5, e1; doi:10.1017/dsj.2018.6.
Moatari Kazerouni, A., Achiche, S., Hisarciklilar, O. & Thomson, V. 2011 Influence of the time perspective on new product development success indicators. In DS 68-3: Proceedings of ICED 11/18th International Conference on Engineering Design, Lyngby-Copenhagen, Denmark, August 15–19, 2011, pp. 4051. The Design Society.
Nemeth, C. J. 1997 Managing innovation: when less is more. California Management Review 40, 5974; doi:10.2307/41165922.
O’Hare, J., Dekoninck, E., McMahon, C. & Turnbull, A. 2010 Adapting innovation tools to the eco-innovation requirements of industry: case study results. International Journal of Design Engineering 3, 172194; doi:10.1504/IJDE.2010.034863.
Olson, E. L. 2013 It’s not easy being green: the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (2), 171184; doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0305-6.
Philips annual report2017. https://www.results.philips.com/publications/ar17#/ (accessed 6 July 2018).
Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C. & Rozenfeld, H. 2014 Systematization of best practices for eco-design implementation. In DS 77: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2014 13th International Design Conference. Design Society.
Pigosso, D. C. A. & McAloone, T. C. 2015 Supporting the development of environmentally sustainable PSS by means of the ecodesign maturity model. Procedia CIRP 30, 173178; doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.091.
Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C. & Rozenfeld, H. 2016 Characterization of the state-of-the-art and identification of main trends for Eco-design Tools and Methods: classifying three decades of research and implementation. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 95, 405428.
Pigosso, D. C. A. & McAloone, T. C. 2017 How can design science contribute to a circular economy? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 5 (DS87-5), pp. 229238. Design Society.
Piscicelli, L., Ludden, G. D. & Cooper, T. 2018 What makes a sustainable business model successful? An empirical comparison of two peer-to-peer goods-sharing platforms. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 45804591; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.170.
Plouffe, S., Lanoie, P., Berneman, C. & Vernier, M. F. 2011 Economic benefits tied to ecodesign. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 573579; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003.
Proctor, R. 2009 1000 New Eco Designs and Where to Find Them. Laurence King.
Rebelo, M. F., Santos, G. & Silva, R. 2016 Integration of management systems: towards a sustained success and development of organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production 127, 96111; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.011.
Reim, W., Parida, V. & Örtqvist, D. 2015 Product–Service Systems (PSS) business models and tactics – a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 97, 6175; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.003.
Rodrigues, V. P., Pigosso, D. C. A. & McAloone, T. C. 2017 Measuring the implementation of ecodesign management practices: a review and consolidation of process-oriented performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 156, 239309; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.049.
Rodrigues, V., Pigosso, D., Andersen, J. & McAloone, T. 2018 Evaluating the potential business benefits of ecodesign implementation: a logic model approach. Sustainability 10 (6), 2011; doi:10.3390/su10062011.
Roxana-Ioana, B. 2016 Key performance indicators disclosures by the integrated reporting. Annals of ‘Constantin Brancusi’ University of Targu-Jiu. Economy Series 1, 151157.
Roy, R. 2016 Consumer Product Innovation and Sustainable Design: The Evolution and Impacts of Successful Products. Routledge.
Russo, D., Rizzi, C. & Spreafico, C. 2017 How to build guidelines for eco-improvement. In International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, pp. 879887. Springer International Publishing AG 2017; doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_82.
Santolaria, M., Oliver-Solà, J., Gasol, C. M., Morales-Pinzón, T. & Rieradevall, J. 2011 Eco-design in innovation driven companies: perception, predictions and the main drivers of integration. The Spanish example. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 13151323; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.009.
Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S. & Bessant, J. 2012 Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Management 42, 195206; doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00678.x.
Sempels, C. & Hoffmann, J. 2013 Sustainable Innovation Strategy: Creating Value in a World of Finite Resources. Springer.
She, J.2013 Designing features that influence decisions about sustainable products, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, PhD; doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3544.
She, J. & MacDonald, E. F. 2018 Exploring the effects of a product’s sustainability triggers on pro-environmental decision-making. Journal of Mechanical Design 140 (1), 011102; doi:10.1115/1.4038252.
Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W., Tam, L. & Ji, Y. B. 2010 Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 254259; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014.
Skerlos, S. J. 2015 Promoting effectiveness in sustainable design. Procedia CIRP 29, 1318; doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.080.
Song, C., Luo, J., Hoelttae-Otto, K., Seering, W. & Otto, K. 2015 Risk and Innovation Balance in Crowdfunding New Products. In DS 80-8: Proceedings of ICED 15/20th International Conference on Engineering Design, Milan, Italy, July 27–30, 2015, pp. 110. The Design Society.
Stål, H. I. & Corvellec, H. 2018 A decoupling perspective on circular business model implementation: illustrations from Swedish apparel. Journal of Cleaner Production 171, 630643; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.249.
Stark, R., Buchert, T., Neugebauer, S., Bonvoisin, J. & Finkbeiner, M. 2017 Benefits and obstacles of sustainable product development methods: a case study in the field of urban mobility. Design Science 3, e17; doi:10.1017/dsj.2017.20.
Tabassi, A. A., Roufechaei, K. M., Ramli, M., Bakar, A. H. A., Ismail, R. & Pakir, A. H. K. 2016 Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers. Journal of Cleaner Production 124, 339349; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.076.
Telenko, C., O’Rourke, J. M., Seepersad, C. C. & Webber, M. E. 2016 A compilation of design for environment guidelines. Journal of Mechanical Design 138, 031102; doi:10.1115/1.4032095.
Tischner, U. & Charter, M. 2001 Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future. Greenleaf.
Tyl, B., Legardeur, J., Millet, D. & Vallet, F. 2014 A comparative study of ideation mechanisms used in eco-innovation tools. Journal of Engineering Design 25, 325345; doi:10.1080/09544828.2014.992772.
Van Weenen, J. C. 1995 Towards sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 3, 95100; doi:10.1016/0959-6526(95)00062-J.
Varadarajan, R. 2017 Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45, 1436; doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0461-6.
Vezzoli, C., Ceschin, F., Diehl, J. C. & Kohtala, C. 2015 New design challenges to widely implement ‘Sustainable Product–Service Systems’. Journal of Cleaner Production 97, 112; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.061.
Vezzoli, C. & Manzini, E. 2008 Design for Environmental Sustainability. Springer.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development2010. Vision 2050: The new agenda for business.
Xia, D., Yu, Q., Gao, Q. & Cheng, G. 2017 Sustainable technology selection decision-making model for enterprise in supply chain: Based on a modified strategic balanced scorecard. Journal of Cleaner Production 141, 13371348; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.083.
Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M. & Gonzalez, R. 2016 Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies 46, 95124; doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001.
Yung, W. K., Chan, H. K., So, J. H., Wong, D. W., Choi, A. C. & Yue, T. M. 2011 A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product. Journal of Engineering Design 22, 6985; doi:10.1080/09544820902916597.
Zhang, H., Li, X. & Feng, Z. 2018 Environmental regulation, technological innovation and sustainable growth. In 5th International Conference on Business, Economics and Management (BUSEM 2018), Yinchuan, China, July 4–6, 2018. Francis Academic Press.
Zhao, L. & Freiheit, T. 2017 Estimating good design attributes from generalized drivers to provide early assistance to design requirements analysis. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 15, 317340; doi:10.1108/JEDT-06-2016-0033.
Zimmerling, E., Purtik, H. & Welpe, I. M. 2017 End-users as co-developers for novel green products and services – an exploratory case study analysis of the innovation process in incumbent firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 162, S51S58; doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.160.

Keywords

Can the choice of eco-design principles affect products’ success?

  • Lorenzo Maccioni (a1), Yuri Borgianni (a1) and Daniela C. A. Pigosso (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed