Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:45:54.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential of Nonverbal Communication Research for Research in Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Martha Davis  and
Lois Andreasen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a growing body of knowledge about movement behavior (as it is variously called--kinesics, nonverbal communciation, expressive movement, body language, etc.). Increasingly anthropologists, psychologists, researchers in child development, etc. are attending to body movement. One could argue that although this is still a relatively underdeveloped area of research and that studies we have now will probably be rendered quite obsolete in five years, there is enough of a picture of what can be done and may be discovered to talk about it as a field in its own right. Further, one could argue that the preliminary research techinques and findings of movement research may, even at this point, be useful and relevant to research in dance. As an introduction to the topic a survey of some of the most important behavioral studies of body movement will be presented, followed by a discussion of a dance film and then implications of a practical, methodological, empirical, and theoretical nature that may be of interest to dance researchers.

For purposes of discussion, this survey is divided into three parts according to those studies which deal with (1) movement and expression of emotions, (2) movement style (from individual to cultural), and (3) movement in interaction.

It seems that the most common assumption about body movement is that it reveals inner emotions or attitudes. Darwin first made this idea the subject of serious scientific study in 1872 when he published The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.

Type
Articles and Reports
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , November 1973 , pp. 10 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Committee on Research in Dance 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Presented at the CORD Meetings, June 13, 1973, Duke University

References

REFERENCES

Bartenieff, Irmgard and Davis, Martha. “Effort-Shape Analysis of Movement: The Unity of Expression and Function.” 1965; Reprinted in Research Approaches to Movement and Personality, Davis, Martha (advisory editor), New York: Arno Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, Irmgard and Paulay, Forrestine. “Choreometric Profiles.” in Folk Song Style and Culture by Lomax, A., 248–261, Washington, D. C.: AAAS Publication No. 88, 1968.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, Irmgard; Davis, Martha; and Paulay, Forrestine. Four Adaptations of Effort Theory in Research and Teaching. New York: DNB Publications, 1972.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, Ray L. Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Condon, William S. “Linguistic-Kinesic Research and Dance Therapy.” American Dance Therapy Association Proceedings, 21–44, 1968.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Martha and Schmais, Claire. “An Analysis of the Style and Composition of ‘Water Study’.” In Research in Dance: Problems and Possibilities, Ball, Richard, ed., 105–113, New York: CORD Publications, 1967.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha. “Movement Characteristics of Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the American Dance Therapy Association, 1970 a.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha. “An Effort-Shape Movement Analysis of a Family Therapy Session.” DNB Publications, 1970 b.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha. Understanding Body Movement: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Arno Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha. “Towards Understanding the Intrinsic in Body Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Yeshiva University, 1973.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Felix. “Analysis of Postural Behavior.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 16(1947): 195–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittmann, Allen T.; Parloff, Morris B. and Boomer, Donald S. “Facial and Bodily Expression: A Study of Receptivity of Emotional Cues.” Psychiatry 28(1965): 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, Starkey. “Towards a Grammar for Floor Apportionment: A System Approach to Face-to-Face Interaction.” In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Environmental Design Research Association Conference, 1970, 225–235.Google Scholar
Efron, Davis. Gesture and Environment. New York: King's Crown Press, 1941. (Reprinted as Gesture and Culture, The Hague: Mouton Publishers).Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul; Sorenson, E. Richard; and Friesen, Wallace V. “Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion.” Science 164(1969): 86–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. and Ellsworth, P. Emotion in the Human Face. New York: Bergamon Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fortier, Cheryl E. “Male-Female Differences in Movement.” Unpublished Masters Thesis, Hunter College, 1973.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Symptomatic and Change Actions.” In The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud, trans, and ed. by Brill, A.A., 129–140. New York: Random House, 1938.Google Scholar
Gesell, Arnold, et al. The First Five Years of Life. New York: Harper and Row, 1940.Google Scholar
Gunther, Phyllis Frant and Richards, Jill. “Movement Characteristics of Urban Adolescents.” Unpublished Masters Thesis, Hunter College, 1973.Google Scholar
Hall, E.T. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday and Company, 1966.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy M. ”The Politics of Touch.” Presented at a meeting of the American Psychological Association, 1970.Google Scholar
Hewes, Gordon W. “World Distribution of Certain Postural Habits.” American Anthropologist 57(1955): 231–244.Google Scholar
Jablonko, Allison. “Dance and Daily Activities Among the Maring People of New Guinea: A Cinimatographic Analysis of Body Movement Style.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, 1968.Google Scholar
Jourard, Sidney M. “An Exploratory Study of Body-Accessibility”. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 5(1966): 221–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestenberg, Judith S. et al. “Development of the Young Child as Expressed through Bodily Movement. I. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 19(1971); 746–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matchotka, Pavel. “Body Movement as Communication.” In Dialogues: Behavioral Science Research, Vol. 2. Boulder, Colo.: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1965.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. “Inference of Attitudes from the Posture, Orientation, and Distance of a Communicator.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 32(1968): 296–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrabian, Albert. “Significance of Posture and Position in the Communication of Attitude and Status Relationships.” Psychological Bulletin 71(1969): 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorehead, Alan. Darwin and the Beagle. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.Google Scholar
North, Marion. Personality Assessment through Movement. London: Macdonald and Evans, 1971.Google Scholar
Richards, Jill. “Variations on a Theme by Margaret: The Process of Seeing.” Unpublished paper, Hunter College, 1973.Google Scholar
Reich, Wilhelm. Character-Analysis. 3rd. ed. Trans, by Wolfe, T.P., New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1949.Google Scholar
Scheflen, Albert E. The Stream and Structure of Communicational Behavior: Context Analysis of a Psychotherapy Session. 1965a Revised Ed. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Scheflen, Albert E. “Quasi-Courtship Behavior in Psychotherapy.” Psychiatry 28(1965): 245–257.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, Wendy. “Gesture Styles of the Kung Bushmen and the Blackfoot Indians.” Unpublished Masters Thesis, Hunter College, 1973.Google Scholar
Van Vlack, Jacques. “Filming Psychotherapy from the Viewpoint of a Research Cinematographer.” In Methods of Research in Psychotherapy. Gottschalk, L. and Auerback, A. H., eds., 15–24. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar