Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T07:37:52.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Going Native: Ethics and American Cultural Appropriation of Butoh Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Abstract

Inspired by an illustration entitled “Traditional Japanese Physique” in an American text on Butoh dance, this paper probes the conception of and relationship to such a body within American Butoh dance. What is this notion of a “Japanese body,” and what are the ethics of appropriating it? How do we talk about the body in a dance form that grew from a specific cultural context but is now considered a global form? I address these questions with reference to “Orientalization” in early American Modern Dance and related practices in contemporary American Butoh. Applying Edward T. Hall's model of cross-cultural communication to dance studies, I discuss ways in which American dancers and dance scholars might approach the Butoh body in nonessentializing terms. This paper is intended to open up conversation about cultural appropriation in artwork and the complexities of Butoh dance as a global practice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Desmond, Jane C. 2001. “Dancing Out the Difference: Cultural Imperialism and Ruth St. Denis's Radha of 1906.” In Moving History/Dancing Cultures: A Dance History Reader, edited by Ann, Dils and Ann Cooper, Albright, 256–70. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 2003. “The Spectacle of the ‘Other.’”In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, 223290. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hammer, Mitchell R., Bennett, Milton J., and Wiseman, Richard. 2002. “The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI),” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, pdf available online via <http://www.idiinventory.com/about.php>, 17.,+1–7.>Google Scholar
Kim, Thomas W. 2006. “Being Modern: The Circulation of Oriental Objects.American Quarterly 58 (2): 379406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurihara, Nanako. 1997. “The Most Remote Thing in the Universe: Critical Analysis of Hijikata Tatsumi's Butoh.” Ph.D. diss., New York University.Google Scholar
Kurihara, Nanako. 2000. “Hijikata Tatsumi: The Words of Butoh.TDR: The Drama Review 44 (1): 5152.Google Scholar
Laage, Joan. 1993. “Embodying the Spirit: The Significance of the Body in the Japanese Contemporary Dance Movement of Butoh.” Ph.D. diss., Texas Women's University.Google Scholar
Minh-ha, Trinh T. 1991. When The Moon Waxes Red. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M., Hart, William, and Miike, Yoshitaka. 2002. “Edward T. Hall and the History of Intercultural Communications: The United States and Japan.” Keio Communication Review 24:326.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1979. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Slack, Jennifer Daryl, and Whitt, Laurie Anne. 1992. “Ethics and Cultural Studies.” In Cultural Studies, edited by Grossberg, Lawrence, Nelson, Cary, and Treichler, Paula, 571–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar