Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 10

  • Access

Extension theorems for differential forms and Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing on log canonical varieties

  • Daniel Greb (a1), Stefan Kebekus (a2) and Sándor J. Kovács (a3)

Abstract

Given a normal variety Z, a p-form σ defined on the smooth locus of Z and a resolution of singularities , we study the problem of extending the pull-back π*(σ) over the π-exceptional set . For log canonical pairs and for certain values of p, we show that an extension always exists, possibly with logarithmic poles along E. As a corollary, it is shown that sheaves of reflexive differentials enjoy good pull-back properties. A natural generalization of the well-known Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing theorem to log canonical threefold pairs follows.

    •

      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Extension theorems for differential forms and Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing on log canonical varieties
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Extension theorems for differential forms and Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing on log canonical varieties
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Extension theorems for differential forms and Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing on log canonical varieties
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © Foundation Compositio Mathematica 2009

References

Hide All
[1]Beltrametti, M. C. and Sommese, A. J., The adjunction theory of complex projective varieties, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, vol. 16 (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995).
[2]Brieskorn, E., Rationale Singularitäten komplexer Flächen, Invent. Math. 4 (1967–1968), 336–358.
[3]Deligne, P., Équations différentielles à points singuliers réguliers, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 163 (Springer, Berlin, 1970).
[4]Esnault, H. and Viehweg, E., Lectures on vanishing theorems, DMV Seminar, vol. 20 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1992).
[5]Flenner, H., Extendability of differential forms on nonisolated singularities, Invent. Math. 94 (1988), 317–326.
[6]Hartshorne, R., Local cohomology, A seminar given by A. Grothendieck, Harvard University, Fall, vol. 1961 (Springer, Berlin, 1967).
[7]Hartshorne, R., Ample subvarieties of algebraic varieties, Notes written in collaboration with C. Musili. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 156 (Springer, Berlin, 1970).
[8]Hartshorne, R., Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52 (Springer, New York, 1977).
[9]Hassett, B. and Kovács, S. J., Reflexive pull-backs and base extension, J. Algebraic Geom. 13 (2004), 233–247.
[10]Iitaka, S., Algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 76 (Springer, New York, 1982); An introduction to birational geometry of algebraic varieties, North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 24.
[11]Kaup, W., Infinitesimale Transformationsgruppen komplexer Räume, Math. Ann. 160 (1965), 72–92.
[12]Kawamata, Y., Matsuda, K. and Matsuki, K., Introduction to the minimal model problem, Algebraic geometry, Sendai, 1985, Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, vol. 10 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987), 283–360.
[13]Kebekus, S. and Kovács, S. J., The structure of surfaces mapping to the moduli stack of canonically polarized varieties, Preprint (2007), arXiv:0707.2054.
[14]Kebekus, S. and Kovács, S. J., Families of canonically polarized varieties over surfaces, Invent. Math. 172 (2008), 657–682; DOI: 10.1007/s00222-008-0128-8.
[15]Kebekus, S. and Kovács, S. J., The structure of surfaces and threefolds mapping to the moduli stack of canonically polarized varieties, Preprint (2008), arXiv:0812.2305.
[16]Kebekus, S. and Solá Conde, L., Existence of rational curves on algebraic varieties, minimal rational tangents, and applications, in Global aspects of complex geometry (Springer, Berlin, 2006), 359–416.
[17]Keel, S. and McKernan, J., Rational curves on quasi-projective surfaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (1999), viii+153.
[18]Kollár, J., Lectures on resolution of singularities, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 166 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2007).
[19]Kollár, J. and Mori, S., Birational geometry of algebraic varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), with the collaboration of C. H. Clemens and A. Corti, translated from the 1998 Japanese original.
[20]Langer, A., The Bogomolov–Miyaoka–Yau inequality for log canonical surfaces, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 64 (2001), 327–343.
[21]Langer, A., Logarithmic orbifold Euler numbers of surfaces with applications, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 86 (2003), 358–396.
[22]Mumford, D., The topology of normal singularities of an algebraic surface and a criterion for simplicity, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 9 (1961), 5–22.
[23]Namikawa, Y., Extension of 2-forms and symplectic varieties, J. Reine Angew. Math. 539 (2001), 123–147.
[24]Okonek, C., Schneider, M. and Spindler, H., Vector bundles on complex projective spaces, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 3 (Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1980).
[25]Reid, M., Young person’s guide to canonical singularities, in Algebraic geometry, Bowdoin, 1985 (Brunswick, Maine, 1985), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 46 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987), 345–414.
[26]Steenbrink, J. H. M., Vanishing theorems on singular spaces, Astérisque 130 (1985), 330–341.
[27]van Straten, D. and Steenbrink, J., Extendability of holomorphic differential forms near isolated hypersurface singularities, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 55 (1985), 97–110.
[28]Wahl, J. M., A characterization of quasihomogeneous Gorenstein surface singularities, Compositio Math. 55 (1985), 269–288.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

Keywords

MSC classification

  • Cited by 10

  • Access

Extension theorems for differential forms and Bogomolov–Sommese vanishing on log canonical varieties

  • Daniel Greb (a1), Stefan Kebekus (a2) and Sándor J. Kovács (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed