Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Diffeomorphism groups of tame Cantor sets and Thompson-like groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2018

Louis Funar
Affiliation:
Institute Fourier, UMR 5582, Department of Mathematics, University Grenoble Alpes, CS40700, 38058 Grenoble, CEDEX 9, France email louis.funar@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
Yurii Neretin
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Vienna, Nordbergstrasse 15, Vienna, Austria Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Mech. Math. Department, Moscow State University, Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia email neretin@mccme.ru
Corresponding

Abstract

The group of ${\mathcal{C}}^{1}$ -diffeomorphisms of any sparse Cantor subset of a manifold is countable and discrete (possibly trivial). Thompson’s groups come out of this construction when we consider central ternary Cantor subsets of an interval. Brin’s higher-dimensional generalizations $nV$ of Thompson’s group $V$ arise when we consider products of central ternary Cantor sets. We derive that the ${\mathcal{C}}^{2}$ -smooth mapping class group of a sparse Cantor sphere pair is a discrete countable group and produce this way versions of the braided Thompson groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Authors 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alvarez, S., Filimonov, D., Kleptsyn, V., Malicet, D., Cotón, C. M., Navas, A. and Triestino, M., Groups with infinitely many ends acting analytically on the circle , J. Topol. , to appear. Preprint (2015), arXiv:1506.03839.Google Scholar
Aramayona, J. and Funar, L., Asymptotic mapping class groups of closed surfaces punctured along Cantor sets, Preprint (2017), arXiv:1701.08132.Google Scholar
Bamón, R., Moreira, C. G., Plaza, S. and Vera, J., Differentiable structures of central Cantor sets , Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 17 (1997), 10271042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bieri, R. and Strebel, R., Groups of PL homeomorphisms of the real line, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 215 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2016).Google Scholar
Blankenship, W. A., Generalization of a construction of Antoine , Ann. of Math. (2) 53 (1951), 276297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleak, C. and Lanoue, D., A family of non-isomorphism results , Geom. Dedicata 146 (2010), 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, C., Monteverde, I., Navas, A. and Rivas, C., Rigidity for C1 actions on the interval arising from hyperbolicity I: solvable groups , Math. Z. 286 (2017), 919949.Google Scholar
Brin, M. G., Higher dimensional Thompson groups , Geom. Dedicata 108 (2004), 163192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, M. G., The algebra of strand splitting. I. A braided version of Thompson’s group V , J. Group Theory 10 (2007), 757788.Google Scholar
Brin, M. G., On the baker’s map and the simplicity of the higher dimensional Thompson groups nV , Publ. Mat. 54 (2010), 433439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. S. and Geoghegan, R., An infinite-dimensional torsion-free FP group , Invent. Math. 77 (1984), 367381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. S., Finiteness properties of groups , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 44 (1987), 4575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, J. W., Floyd, W. J. and Parry, W. R., Introductory notes in Richard Thompson’s groups , Enseign. Math. 42 (1996), 215256.Google Scholar
Castro, G., Jorquera, E. and Navas, A., Sharp regularity of certain nilpotent group actions on the interval , Math. Ann. 359 (2014), 101152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. and Pignataro, T., On the shape of Cantor sets , J. Differential Geom. 28 (1988), 203221.Google Scholar
Dehornoy, P., The group of parenthesized braids , Adv. Math. 205 (2006), 354409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deroin, B., Kleptsyn, V. and Navas, A., On the question of ergodicity for minimal group actions on the circle , Mosc. Math. J. 9 (2009), 263303.Google Scholar
Deroin, B., Kleptsyn, V. and Navas, A., Sur la dynamique unidimensionnelle en régularité intermédiaire , Acta Math. 199 (2007), 199262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deroin, B., Kleptsyn, V. and Navas, A., On the ergodic theory of free group actions by real-analytic circle diffeomorphisms, Invent. Math., to appear. Preprint (2013),arXiv:1312.4133.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. J. and van Mill, J., Erdös space and homeomorphism groups of manifolds , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 208 (2010), no. 979.Google Scholar
Dippolito, P. R., Codimension one foliations of closed manifolds , Ann. of Math. (2) 107 (1978), 403453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J., Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications (Wiley, Chichester, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, K. J. and Marsh, D. T., On the Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets , Mathematika 39 (1992), 223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funar, L. and Kapoudjian, C., On a universal mapping class group of genus zero , Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), 9651012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funar, L. and Kapoudjian, C., The braided Ptolemy–Thompson group is finitely presented , Geom. Topol. 12 (2008), 475530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funar, L. and Nguyen, M., On the automorphisms group of the asymptotic pants complex of an infinite surface of genus zero , Math. Nachr. 289 (2016), 11891207.Google Scholar
Ghys, É. and Sergiescu, V., Sur un groupe remarquable de difféomorphismes du cercle , Comment. Math. Helv. 62 (1987), 185239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, P., Projective aspects of the Higman–Thompson group , in Group Theory from a Geometrical Viewpoint, Proceedings of ICTP workshop, Trieste, 1990 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), 633644.Google Scholar
Greenberg, P. and Sergiescu, V., An acyclic extension of the braid group , Comment. Math. Helv. 66 (1991), 109138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, J. and Matucci, F., Presentations for the higher-dimensional Thompson groups nV , Pacific J. Math. 257 (2012), 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higman, G., Finitely presented infinite simple groups, Notes on Pure Mathematics, vol. 8 (Australian National University, Canberra, 1974).Google Scholar
Hurtado, S. and Militon, E., Distortion and Tits alternative in smooth mapping class groups, Preprint (2015), arXiv:1506.02877.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. E., Fractals and self-similarity , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorquera, E., A universal nilpotent group of C1 -diffeomorphisms of the interval , Topol. Appl. 159 (2012), 21152126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapoudjian, C. and Sergiescu, V., An extension of the Burau representation to a mapping class group associated to Thompson’s group T , in Geometry and dynamics, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 389 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005), 141164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laget, G., Groupes de Thompson projectifs en genre 0, PhD thesis, University of Grenoble (2004), available at:http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/04/71/79/PDF/tel-00006388.pdf.Google Scholar
McDuff, D., C1 -minimal subset of the circle , Ann. Inst. Fourier 31 (1981), 177193.Google Scholar
McMillan, D. R. Jr., Taming Cantor sets in E n , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 70 (1964), 706708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, C. G., There are no C1 -stable intersections of regular Cantor sets , Acta Math. 206 (2011), 311323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navas, A., On uniformly quasisymmetric groups of circle diffeomorphisms , Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 31 (2006), 437462.Google Scholar
Navas, A., Growth of groups and diffeomorphisms of the interval , Geom. Funct. Anal. 18 (2008), 9881028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neretin, Y., Combinatorial analogues of the group of diffeomorphisms of the circle , Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 56 (1992), 10721085; Engl. transl. Russian Acad. Sci. Izv. Math. 41(2) (1993), 337–349.Google Scholar
Portela, A., Regular interval Cantor sets of S 1 and minimality , Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 40 (2009), 5375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, H., Ruan, H.-J. and Yang, W., Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets and algebraic properties of contraction ratios , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), 11091126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, M., On the reconstruction of topological spaces from their groups of homeomorphisms , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 312 (1989), 487538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, M., Locally moving groups and reconstruction problems, ordered groups and infinite permutation groups (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996), 121157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacksteder, R., Foliations and pseudogroups , Amer. J. Math. 87 (1965), 79102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shilepsky, A. C., A rigid Cantor set in E 3 , Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 22 (1974), 223224.Google Scholar
Stein, M., Groups of piecewise linear homeomorphisms , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 332 (1992), 477514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D., Differentiable structures on fractal-like sets, determined by intrinsic scaling functions on dual Cantor sets , in The Mathematical Heritage of Hermann Weyl (Durham, NC, 1987), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 48 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1988), 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, W. P., A generalization of the Reeb stability theorem , Topology 13 (1974), 347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuboi, T., Homological and dynamical study on certain groups of Lipschitz homeomorphisms of the circle , J. Math. Soc. Japan 47 (1995), 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. G., Rigid sets in E n , Pacific J. Math. 121 (1986), 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xi, L.-F. and Xiong, Y., Lipschitz equivalence class, ideal class and the gauss class number problem, Preprint (2013), arXiv:1304.0103.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 90 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 03rd April 2018 - 17th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-qzt2x Total loading time: 0.435 Render date: 2021-01-17T13:52:16.195Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sun Jan 17 2021 12:54:38 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Diffeomorphism groups of tame Cantor sets and Thompson-like groups
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Diffeomorphism groups of tame Cantor sets and Thompson-like groups
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Diffeomorphism groups of tame Cantor sets and Thompson-like groups
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *