Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:54:47.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological Determinism: A Critique of Convergence Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Reinhard John Skinner
Reinhard John Skinner
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Convergence theorists enjoy an almost unique intellectual position: they are supported by both academics and non-academics without really having been subject to a comprehensive analytical examination. Theirs is an hypothesis encompassing many, if not all, spheres of so-ciology, and applicable to the whole of the industrialised world. By implication it also involves the future of all the industrialising nations. It is this very breadth of scope which has denied it the enquiry it deserves.

Type
Social Convergence
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 2 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, Raymond, 18 Lectures on Industrial Society; London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967.Google Scholar
Baran, Paul A. and Sweezy, Paul M., Monopoly Capital; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, The End of Ideology; Glencoe, Illinois; The Free Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Boorstein, E., The Economic Transformation of Cuba; New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Budd, Susan, ‘Social Stratification in Industrial Society: A Comment’ in Halmos, Paul (ed.) The Development of Industrial Societies, Sociological Review Monograph, No. 8: University of Keele (10 1964), pp. 123–31.Google Scholar
Christenson, R. M. et al. ,Ideologies and Modern Politics; London: Nelson, 1972.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Isaac, ‘Roots of Bureaucracy’ in Miliband, R. and Savile, J. (eds.), The Socialist Register (1969), pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Isaac,The Unfinished Revolution: Russia 1917–1967; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Djilas, M.. The New Class; London: Unwin Books, 1966.Google Scholar
Feldman, Arnold S. and Moore, Wilbert E., ‘Industrialisation and Industrialism: Convergence and Differentiation’ in Faunce, W. A. and Form, W. H. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives in Industrial Society; Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1969, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar
Frank, Andre Gunder, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John K., The New Industrial State; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A., ‘Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective’ in Hoselitz, B. F. (ed.), The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H., ‘Social Stratification in Industrial Society’ in Halmos, Paul (ed.), The Development of Industrial Societies, Sociological Review Monograph, No. 8: University of Keele (10 1964), pp. 97–121.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F., AND Platt, J.The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Hollander, Paul, ‘Observations on Bureaucracy, Totalitarianism, and the Comparative Study of Communism’ in Cornell, Richard (ed.) The Soviet Political System; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1970, pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A. and Bauer, R. A., The Soviet Citizen; London: Oxford University Press, 1959, Chapter XVI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Robin, Exploitation: the world power structure and the inequality of nations; London: Macgibbon and Kee, 1970.Google Scholar
Kerr, C, Dunlop, J., Harbison, F., AND Myers, C. A., Industrialism and Industrial Man; London: Heinemann, 1962.Google Scholar
Laquer, Walter, The Fate of the Revolution: Interpretations of Soviet History; London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967, pp. 186–189.Google Scholar
Lukacs, G., History and Class Consciousness; London: Merlin, 1971.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, One Dimensional Man; London: Sphere Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H et al. . The Limits to Growth; London: Earth Island Limited, 1972.Google Scholar
Meissner, Herbert, Konvergenztheorie Und Realität; Frankfurt: Verlag Marxistische Blatter, 1971.Google Scholar
Meyer, Alfred G., ‘Theories of Convergence’ in Johnson, Chalmers A. (ed.), Change in Communist Systems; Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1970, pp. 313–41.Google Scholar
Miliband, Ralph, ‘Professor Galbraith and American Capitalism’ in Miliband, R. and Savile, J. (eds.), The Socialist Register (1968), pp. 215–29.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M. and Bryce, H., ‘Social Mobility and Economic Growth and Structure’ in Faunce, W. A. and Form, W. H. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives in Industrial Society; Little, Brown, and Co., 1969, pp. 191–201.Google Scholar
Moore, W. E., The Impact of Industry; New York: Prentice-Hall, 1965, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Platt, J. A., ‘Social Stratification in Industrial Society: A Comment’ in Halmos, Paul (ed.), The Development of Industrial Societies, Sociological Review Monograph, No. 8; University of Keele (10 1964), pp. 133–9.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. I., Communism and China: Ideology in Flux; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 162–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spulber, N., Socialist Management and Planning; Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon, Revolution Betrayed; London: New Park Publications, 1967.Google Scholar
Wheelwright, E. L. and McFarlane, B., The Chinese Road to Socialism; New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, ‘Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume IX (1966–1967), pp. 292–323.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, C, ‘On the Transition between Capitalism and Socialism’, Monthly Review (03 1969), pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert, ‘Early Industrialisation and the Labouring Class’, The Sociological Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 1 (01 1960), pp. 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, A. S., ‘The Nature of Industrial Societies’, World Politics, Volume XII, Number 4 (07 1960), pp. 614–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Jack, ‘The Economics of Maoism’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (02 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalecki, Michal, ‘Theories of Growth in Different Social Systems’, Monthly Review (10 1971), pp. 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Revolutionary Mass Criticism Writing Group of the Party School under the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, ‘Theory of “Combine Two into One” is Reactionary Philosophy for Restoring Capitalism’, Peking Review, 17 (04 23, 1971), 6–11.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Ian, ‘The Problem of the Convergence of Industrial Societies: A Critical Look at the State of a Theory’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume XI (1969), pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiles, Peter, ‘Will Capitalism and Communism Spontaneously Converge?’, Encounter, Number 20 (06 1963), pp. 84–90.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest, ‘The Transitional Economy’; Unpublished paper given to the Conference of Radical East European and Soviet Scholars, Imperial College, University of London, October 1972.Google Scholar
Millar, J., ‘East and West: Economic Convergence in View?’ Unpublished paper given to the Economic History Society, University of Sheffield, 1972.Google Scholar