Article contents
Development as History. A Review Article
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0010417500013189/resource/name/firstPage-S0010417500013189a.jpg)
- Type
- Agricultural Labor and Capitalism
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1979
References
1 See, among others, Thrupp, Sylvia L., “Tradition and Development: A Choice of Views”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 6:1 (10 1963), 84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar (review article). Cf. also Hirashima, , p. 33,Google Scholar quoting a British commission of 1928 affirming the competence of traditional peasant farmers: further increases in yields would have to await scientific progress.
2 O'Brien, P. K., Heath, D. and Keyder, C., “Agricultural efficiency in Britain and France, 1815–1914”, The Journal of European Economic History, 6:2 (Fall 1977), 339–91;Google Scholar and Ruttan, Vernon W., “Structural retardation and the modernization of French agriculture: A skeptical view,” The Journal of Economic History, 38:3 (09 1978), 714–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Cf. Dovring, Folke, “Eighteenth-century changes in European agriculture: A comment,” Agricultural History, 43:1 (01 1969), 181–86.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by