Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T22:35:39.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological Testing: Evolution and Emerging Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Christopher Randolph
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neuropsychological (NP) test batteries have evolved as an amalgam of intelligence tests, various individual measures of “biological” cognition, and sensory and motor testing. The early emphasis of NP testing was to identify “organicity” and central nervous system lesion localization. More recent approaches have emphasized the profiling of performance across individual neurocognitive domains (eg, attention, memory, and language) to facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning. However, the field is still hampered by the use of many tests that are antiquated, excessively long, or of dubious psychometric quality. Some of these problems may have contributed to the current under-utilization of NP testing in diagnostic workups of neuropsychiatric disorders. This paper reviews some of the recent changes in the field that hold promise for substantially shortening assessments, improving diagnostic reliability, and making NP testing more cost-effective and practical.

Type
Feature Article
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 2002 , pp. 307 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Assessment: neuropsychological testing of adults. Consideration for neurologists. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 1996;47:592–599.Google Scholar
2.Levin, HS. A guide to clinical neuropsychological testing. Arch Neural. 1994;51:854–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Schatz, P, Hughes, LJ, Chute, DL. Underutilization of neuropsychology in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: is managed care to blame? Neurorehabil. 2001;19:281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sweet, JJ, Moberg, PJ, Suchy, Y. Ten-year follow-up survey of clinical neuropsychologists: Part II. private practice and economics. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;14:479–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Ludy, B. A History of Psychology: Original Sources and Contemporary Research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1988.Google Scholar
6.Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.Google Scholar
7.Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1995.Google Scholar
8.Wechsler, D. Wechsler Memory Scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, Tex: 1997.Google Scholar
9.Reitan, RM. Ward Halstead: Contributions to neuropsychology and the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. J Clin Psychol. 1994;50:47–70.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Reed, J. The contributions of Ward Halstead, Ralph Reitan and their associates. Int J Neurosci. 1985;25:289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Heaton, RK, Grant, I, Matthews, CG. Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographic Corrections, Research Findings, and Clinical Applications. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991.Google Scholar
12.Brandt, J. Nelson, M. Butters (1937-1995) [abstract]. Am Psychol. 1996;51:1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Goldstein, G. Contemporary approaches to neuropsychological assessment. In: Goldstein, G, Incagnoli, T, eds. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Plenum; 1997:67–91.Google Scholar
14.Randolph, C. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Fink, J, McCrea, M, Randolph, C. Neuropsychological differentiation of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a neurocognitive profile approach using a short battery [abstract]. J Int Neuropsych Soc. 1998;4:30.Google Scholar
16.Randolph, C, Mohr, E, Chase, TN. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsych. 1998;20:310–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Gold, JM, Queern, C, Iannone, VN, Buchanan, RW. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, I: sensitivity, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1944–1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Hobart, MP, Goldberg, R, Bartko, JJ, Gold, JM. Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:1951–1957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Wechsler, D. Wechsler Test of Adult Reading. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 2001.Google Scholar
20.Green, P, Allen, L. Word Memory Test. Durham, NC: Cognisyst, Inc.Google Scholar
21.Robbins, T, James, M, Owen, A, Sahakian, B, McInnes, L, Rabbit, P. The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytical study in a large number of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia. 1994;5:266–281.Google Scholar
22.Reeves, D, Kane, R, Winter, K, Goldstone, A. Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM). San Diego, Calif: National Cognitive Recovery Foundation; 1995.Google Scholar