Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Examining violence among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity state hospital inpatients across multiple time points: the roles of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptoms

  • Darci Delgado (a1), Sean M. Mitchell (a2) (a3), Robert D. Morgan (a3) and Faith Scanlon (a3)

Abstract

Objective.

Institutional violence in state hospitals is a public health problem that has been severely understudied. Given the personal (ie, staff and patients) and fiscal harms associated with institutional violence, more research into contributing factors for violence is needed. The overarching aim of this study then was to examine associations among psychiatric symptoms, criminal risk factors, and institutional violence.

Methods.

Participants were 200 male, female, and transgender forensic mental health inpatients adjudicated Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and committed to the California Department of State Hospitals. Participants completed a psychiatric symptom measure, and measures of and associated with criminal risk. Institutional violence was recorded from file review and includes physical violence toward staff or patients for 6-months prior to and post patient participation in this study.

Results.

After adjusting for previous institutional violence, results indicated that psychiatric symptoms were not associated with follow-up institutional violence; however, criminal risk was associated with follow-up institutional violence. Unexpectedly, 2 aspects of criminal risk, antisocial cognitions and associates, were not associated with follow-up institutional violence after adjusting for previous institutional violence. Results also provided a tentative cutoff score on the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire for predicting follow-up institutional violence.

Conclusions.

These results have important implications for treating and managing patients at risk for institutional violence, including the need to assess criminogenic risk and leverage treatments that target these risk factors as a best practice approach.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: Darci Delgado (Email: darci.delgado@dsh.ca.gov)

Footnotes

Hide All

The findings and conclusions in “Examining violence among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity state hospital inpatients across multiple time points: the roles of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptoms,” are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the California Department of State Hospitals or the California Health and Human Services Agency.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1.Broderick, C, Azizian, A, Kornbluh, R, Warburton, K. Prevalence of physical violence in a forensic psychiatric hospital system during 2011–2013: patient assaults, staff assaults, and repeatedly violent patients. CNS Spectr. 2015;20(3):319330.
2.§ CA Penal Code 1026.
3.Vitacco, MJ, Balduzzi, E, Rideout, K, Banfe, S, Britton, J. Reconsidering risk assessment with insanity acquittees. Law Hum Behav. 2018;42(5):403.
4.Almeida, F, Moreira, D, Moura, H, Mota, V. Psychiatric monitoring of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity outpatients. J Forensic Legal Med. 2016;38:5863.
5.McDermott, BE, Edens, JF, Quanbeck, CD, Busse, D, Scott, CL. Examining the role of static and dynamic risk factors in the prediction of inpatient violence: variable-and person-focused analyses. Law Hum Behav. 2008;32(4):325338.
6.Grevatt, M, Thomas-Peter, B, Hughes, G. Violence, mental disorder and risk assessment: can structured clinical assessments predict the short-term risk of inpatient violence?. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15(2):278292.
7.Ross, D, Hart, S, Webster, C. Aggression in Psychiatric Patients: Using the HCR-20 to Assess Risk for Violence in Hospital and in the Community. Port Coquitlam, Canada: Riverview Hospital; 1998.
8.Douglas, KS, Guy, LS, Hart, SD. Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(5):679.
9.Iozzino, L, Ferrari, C, Large, M, Nielssen, O, De Girolamo, G. Prevalence and risk factors of violence by psychiatric acute inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0128536.
10.Flannery, RB, Wyshak, G, Tecce, JJ, Flannery, GJ. Characteristics of American assaultive psychiatric patients: review of published findings, 2000–2012. Psychiatric Q. 2014;85(3):319328.
11.Schenk, AM, Fremouw, WJ. Individual characteristics related to prison violence: a critical review of the literature. Aggress Violent Behav. 2012;17(5):430442.
12.Morgan, RD, Flora, DB, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Varghese, F, Steffan, JS. Treating offenders with mental illness: a research synthesis. Law Hum Behav. 2012;36(1):37.
13.Skeem, JL, Steadman, HJ, Manchak, SM. Applicability of the risk-need-responsivity model to persons with mental illness involved in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Serv. 2015;66(9):916922.
14.Draine, J, Salzer, MS, Culhane, DP, Hadley, TR. Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Serv. 2002;53(5):565573.
15.Andrews, DAB, The Psychology of Criminal Conduct . 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company; 2010.
16.Dack, C, Ross, J, Papadopoulos, C, Stewart, D, Bowers, L. A review and meta‐analysis of the patient factors associated with psychiatric in‐patient aggression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013;127(4):255268.
17.Walters, GD. Predicting institutional adjustment and recidivism with the psychopathy checklist factor scores: a meta-analysis. Law Hum Behav. 2003;27(5):541558.
18.Douglas, KS, Strand, S, Belfrage, H, Fransson, G, Levander, S. Reliability and validity evaluation of the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL: SV) in Swedish correctional and forensic psychiatric samples. Assessment. 2005;12(2):145161.
19.Loza, W. Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): a tool for assessing violent and non-violent recidivism. In: Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2018:165.
20.Loza, W, Conley, M, Warren, B. Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2004;48(1):8595.
21.Mitchell, O, Caudy, MS, MacKenzie, DL. A reanalysis of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: psychometric properties and predictive validity. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013;57(4):445459.
22.Loza, W, Neo, LH, Shahinfar, A, Loza-Fanous, A. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2005;49(5):547560.
23.Derogatis, LR, Melisaratos, N. The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983;13(3):595605.
24.Derogatis, LR. BSI brief symptom inventory. Administration, scoring, and procedures manual; 1993.
25.Mills, K. Measures of criminal attitudes and associates: user guide. Unpublished instrument and user guide; 1999.
26.Mills, K. Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment. 2002;9(3):240253.
27.LaPray, M, Ross, H. San Diego quick assessment. J Reading. 1969;12:305307.
28.Tabachnick, BG, Fidell, LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2013.
29.Lussier, P, Verdun-Jones, S, Deslauriers-Varin, N, Nicholls, T, Brink, J. Chronic violent patients in an inpatient psychiatric hospital: Prevalence, description, and identification. Crim Justice Behav. 2010;37(1):529.
30.Broderick, C. Violence Report: DSH Violence 2010–2017. Sacramento, CA: Department of State Hospitals; 2019.
31.Warburton, K. The new mission of forensic mental health systems: managing violence as a medical syndrome in an environment that balances treatment and safety. CNS Spectr. 2014;19(5):368373.
32.Morgan, RD, Fisher, WH, Duan, N, Mandracchia, JT, Murray, D. Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav. 2010;34(4):324336.
33.Skeem, JL, Winter, E, Kennealy, PJ, Louden, JE, Tatar, I, Joseph, R. Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2014;38(3):212.
34.Bjørkly, S, Hartvig, P, Heggen, F-A, Brauer, H, Moger, T. Development of a brief screen for violence risk (V-RISK-10) in acute and general psychiatry: an introduction with emphasis on findings from a naturalistic test of interrater reliability. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):388394.
35.Douglas, KS, Hart, SD, Webster, CD, Belfrage, H. HCR-20V3: Assessing Risk for Violence: User Guide. British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University; 2013.
36.Webster, C, Martin, M, Brink, J, Nicholls, T, Desmarais, S. Manual for the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START; Version 1.1). Coquitlam, Canada: British Columbia Mental Health & Addiction Services; 2009.
37.Morgan, RD, Kroner, D, Mills, JF. A Treatment Manual for Justice Involved Persons with Mental Illness: Changing Lives and Changing Outcomes: Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2017.
38.Morgan, RD, Kroner, DG, Mills, JF, Bauer, RL, Serna, C. Treating justice involved persons with mental illness: preliminary evaluation of a comprehensive treatment program. Crim Justice Behav. 2014;41(7):902916.
39.Gaspar, M, Brown, L, Ramler, T, et al. Therapeutic outcomes of changing lives and changing outcomes for male and female justice involved persons with mental illness. Crim Justice Behav . 2019:0093854819879743.
40.Skeem, JL, Schubert, C, Odgers, C, Mulvey, EP, Gardner, W, Lidz, C. Psychiatric symptoms and community violence among high-risk patients: a test of the relationship at the weekly level. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(5):967.

Keywords

Examining violence among Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity state hospital inpatients across multiple time points: the roles of criminogenic risk factors and psychiatric symptoms

  • Darci Delgado (a1), Sean M. Mitchell (a2) (a3), Robert D. Morgan (a3) and Faith Scanlon (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed