1.Cox, WM, Klinger, E. A motivational model of alcohol use: determinants of use and change. In: Cox WM, Klinger E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Goal-Based Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Addiction and Other Problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 131–158.
2.Klinger, E, Cox, WM. Motivation and the goal theory of current concerns. In: Cox WM, Klinger E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Goal-Based Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Addiction and Other Problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 1–47.
3.Klinger, E. Structure and Functions of Fantasy. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1971.
4.Belin, D, Belin-Rauscent, A, Murray, J, Everitt, B. Addiction: failure of control over maladaptive incentive habits. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013; 23(4): 564–572.
5.Everitt, B, Robbins, T. From the ventral to the dorsal striatum: devolving views of their roles in drug addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013; 37(9 Pt A): 1946–1954.
6.Köhler, W. The Mentality of Apes. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company; 1925.
7.Stahl, B. Addicted nurses keep licenses. StarTribune. 2013; 32: A31, A38–A39.
8.Tiffany, ST, Conklin, CA. A cognitive processing model of alcohol craving and compulsive alcohol use. Addiction. 2000; 95(Suppl 2): S145–S153.
9.Wiers, RW, Cox, WM, Field, M, etal. The search for new ways to change implicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006; 30(2): 320–331.
10.Field, M, Marhe, R, Franken, IH. The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. 2013; 30: 1–6.
11.Van Eerde, W, Thierry, H. Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1996; 81(5): 575–586.
12.Heyman, G. Addiction and choice: theory and new data. Front Psychiatry. 2013; 4: 31.
13.Heyman, G. Resolving the contradictions of addiction. Behav Brain Sci. 1996; 19(4): 561–574.
14.Russell, C, Davies, JB. Empirical, logical and philosophical arguments against cigarette smoking as a pharmacologically compelled act. Current Psychology. 2009; 28(3): 147–168.
15.Bischof, G, Rumpf, H-J, John, U. Natural recovery from addiction. In: Shaffer H, LaPlante D, Nelson S, eds. APA Addiction Syndrome Handbook, Vol 2: Recovery, Prevention, and Other Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2012: 133–155.
16.Stitzer, M, Petry, N. Contingency management for treatment of substance abuse. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006; 2: 411–434.
17.Cox, WM, Fadardi, JS, Pothos, EM. The addiction-Stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(3): 443–476.
18.Field, M, Duka, T, Eastwood, B, etal. Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise? Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007; 192(4): 593–608.
19.Schoenmakers, T, Wiers, RW, Jones, BT, Bruce, G, Jansen, AT. Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007; 102(3): 399–405.
20.Jones, BT, Jones, BC, Smith, H, Copley, N. A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction. 2003; 98(2): 235–244.
21.Waters, H, Green, MW. A demonstration of attentional bias, using a novel dual task paradigm, towards clinically salient material in recovering alcohol abuse patients? Psychol Med. 2003; 33(3): 491–498.
22.Friese, M, Bargas-Avila, J, Hofmann, W, Wiers, R. Here's looking at you, bud: Alcohol-related memory structures predict eye movements for social drinkers with low executive control. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2010; 1(2): 143–151.
23.Field, M, Cox, WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 97(1–2): 1–20.
24.Field, M, Munafo, MR, Franken, IHA. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(4): 589–607.
25.Fadardi, JS, Cox, WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 101(3): 137–145.
26.Wiers, R, Houben, K, Fadardi, J, van Beek, P, Cox, WM. Alcohol approach-bias and attentional retraining for problem drinkers over the Web. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2014.
27.Dawkins, L, Powell, JH, West, R, Powell, J, Pickering, A. A double-blind placebo controlled experimental study of nicotine: I—effects on incentive motivation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 189(3): 355–367.
28.Dickter, CL, Forestell, CA. Peering through the smoke: the effect of parental smoking behavior and addiction on daily smokers’ attentional bias to smoking cues. Addict Behav. 2012; 37(2): 187–192.
29.Gilbert, DG, Sugai, C, Zuo, Y, etal. Brain indices of nicotine's effects on attentional bias to smoking and emotional pictures and to task-relevant targets. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9(3): 351–363.
30.Johnsen, BH, Thayer, JF, Laberg, JC, Asbjornsen, AE. Attentional bias in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers. Addict Behav. 1997; 22(6): 813–817.
31.Mogg, K, Bradley, BP. Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias. J Psychopharmacol. 2002; 16(4): 385–392.
32.Traylor, AC, Bordnick, PS, Carter, BL. Using virtual reality to assess young adult smokers’ attention to cues. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009; 12(4): 373–378.
33.Waters, AJ, Shiffman, S, Sayette, MA, etal. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 2003; 22(4): 378–387.
34.Hester, R, Dixon, V, Garavan, H. A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 81(3): 251–257.
35.Hogarth, L, Dickinson, A, Duka, T. Detection versus sustained attention to drug cues have dissociable roles in mediating drug seeking behavior. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009; 17(1): 21–30.
36.Rosenberg, H. Clinical and laboratory assessment of the subjective experience of drug craving. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(6): 519–534.
37.Attwood, AS, O'Sullivan, H, Leonards, U, Mackintosh, B, Munafo, MR. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 2008; 103(11): 1875–1882.
38.Field, M, Duka, T, Tyler, E, Schoenmakers, T. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(7): 812–822.
39.Goldstein, RZ, Woicik, PA, Lukasik, T, Maloney, T, Volkow, ND. Drug fluency: a potential marker for cocaine use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 89(1): 97–101.
40.Marissen, MAE, Franken, IHA, Waters, AJ, etal. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction. 2006; 101(9): 1306–1312.
41.Conway, KP, Kane, RJ, Ball, SA, Poling, JC, Rounsaville, BJ. Personality, substance of choice, and polysubstance involvement among substance dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003; 71(1): 65–75.
42.Colpaert, K, Vanderplasschen, W, De Maeyer, J, Broekaert, E, De Fruyt, F. Prevalence and determinants of personality disorders in a clinical sample of alcohol-, drug-, and dual-dependent patients. Subst Use Misuse. 2012; 47(6): 649–661.
43.Ziaee, S, Fadardi, JS, Cox, WM. Effects of attention control training on drug abusers’ drug attentional bias and recovery indices. Mashhad, Iran: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2013.
44.Barerfan, Z, Fadardi, JS, Cox, WM. Effects of attention-control training on detoxified drug abusers’ attentional bias and other treatment indices. Mashhad, Iran: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2013.
45.Fadardi, JS, Ziaee, S, Shamloo, ZS. Substance use and the paradox of good and bad attentional bias. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009; 17(6): 456–463.
46.Cho, A, Kwak, S, Lee, J. Identifying attentional bias and emotional response after appearance-related stimuli exposure. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013; 16(1): 50–55.
47.Kwak, SM, Na, DL, Kim, G, Kim, GS, Lee, JH. Use of eye movement to measure smokers’ attentional bias to smoking-related cues. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007; 10(2): 299–304.
48.Kang, O, Chang, D, Jahng, G, etal. Individual differences in smoking-related cue reactivity in smokers: an eye-tracking and fMRI study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012; 38(2): 285–293.
49.Liu, XH, Qian, MY, Zhou, XL, Wang, AM. Repeating the stimulus exposure to investigate what happens after initial selective attention to threatening pictures. Personality and Individual Differences. 2006; 40(5): 1007–1016.
50.Yan, X, Jiang, Y, Wang, J, etal. Preconscious attentional bias in cigarette smokers: a probe into awareness modulation on attentional bias. Addict Biol. 2009; 14(4): 478–488.
51.Cox, WM, Klinger, E. Measuring motivation: the Motivational Structure Questionnaire and Personal Concerns Inventory and their variants. In: Cox WM, Klinger E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Goal-Based Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Addiction and Other Problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 159–204.
52.Klinger, E, Cox, WM. The Motivational Structure Questionnaire and Personal Concerns Inventory: psychometric properties. In: Cox WM, Klinger E, eds. Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Goal-Based Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Addiction and Other Problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011: 177–197.
53.Calitri, R, Pothos, EM, Tapper, K, Brunstrom, JM, Rogers, PJ. Cognitive Biases to Healthy and Unhealthy Food Words Predict Change in BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010; 18(12): 2282–2287.
54.Houben, K, Roefs, A, Jansen, A. Guilty pleasures: implicit preferences for high calorie food in restrained eating. Appetite. 2010; 55(1): 18–24.
55.Kemps, E, Tiggemann, M. Attentional bias for craving-related (chocolate) food cues. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009; 17(6): 425–433.
56.Tapper, K, Pothos, EM, Fadardi, JS, Ziori, E. Restraint, disinhibition and food-related processing bias. Appetite. 2008; 51(2): 335–338.
57.Fadardi, J, Bazzaz, M, Yazdi, A, Nematy, M. The role of attentional bias and eating styles in dieters [translated from Persian]. Journal of Clinical Psychology [in Persian]. 2013; 5(17): 57–68.
58.Field, M, Eastwood, B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005; 183(3): 350–357.
59.Schoenmakers, TM, de Bruin, M, Lux, IF, etal. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 109(1–3): 30–36.
60.Cepeda, N, Pashler, H, Vul, E, Wixted, J, Rohrer, D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132(3): 354–380.
61.Greene, R. Repetition and spacing effects. In: Roediger HL III, ed. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, Vol 2: Cognitive Psychology of Memory. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2008: 65–78.
62.Kirchner, W. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol. 1958; 55(4): 352–358.
63.Jaeggi, S, Buschkuehl, M, Jonides, J, Perrig, W. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(19): 6829–6833.
64.MacLeod, C, Mathews, A, Tata, P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95(1): 15–20.
65.Bar-Haim, Y, Dominique, L, Pergamin, L, Bakermans-Kranenburg, M, van IJzendoorn, M. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Bull. 2007; 133(1): 1–24.
66.Bar-Haim, Y. Research Review: Attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010; 51(8): 859–870.
67.Miller, WR, Tonigan, JS, Longabaugh, R. eds. The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An Instrument for Assessing Adverse Consequences of Alcohol Abuse: Test Manual. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. Vol. 4. NIH Pub. No. 95-3911.
68.Cox, WM, Hogan, LM, Kristian, MR, Race, JH. Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers’ treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 68(3): 237–243.