Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-c97xr Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2022-05-23T12:39:48.725Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Fixated Threat Assessment Centers: preventing harm and facilitating care in public figure threat cases and those thought to be at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Justin Barry-Walsh*
Affiliation:
Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTACNZ) Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
David V. James
Affiliation:
Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTACNZ) Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
Paul E. Mullen
Affiliation:
Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTACNZ) Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
*
*Address correspondence to: Justin Barry-Walsh; Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTACNZ) Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand. (Email: justin.barry-walsh@ccdhb.org.nz)

Abstract

The rediscovery of the importance of mental illness in the risk assessment and management of those who threaten, approach, and harm public figures has led to a new way of dealing with those that threaten public figures. This approach emphasises the role of “fixation” which may be defined as an intense preoccupation pursued to an abnormally intense degree. It integrates a threat assessment paradigm with the literature on stalking. The need for such an approach was highlighted in research on the prevalence of harassment of public figures. Psychiatry has a key role in this approach which sees mental health clinicians and Police work together in Fixated Threat Assessment Centres (FTACs). An FTAC functions by assessing the level of concern and sharing information to facilitate interventions that are often mental health based. The purpose is not the hopeless task of identifying those who will go on to perpetrate serious violence, rather to intervene in the group they emerge from, to prevent harm. As well as decreasing risk to the persons fixated upon, this approach improves care to the mentally disordered people who harass and threaten them and, in doing so, decreases the likelihood of their criminalization while enhancing their quality of life. As expertise in the area has grown, policing and security agencies in several countries have expanded the FTAC model to cover individuals thought at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence, a term that captures both different forms of mass killing and lone actor terrorism.

Type
Review
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mullen, PE, James, DV, Meloy, JR, et al. The fixated and the pursuit of public figures. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20(1):3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Fixated Research Group. Inappropriate Communications, Approaches, and Attacks on the British Royal Family with Additional Consideration of Attacks on Politicians. London, UK: The Home Office; 2006.Google Scholar
James, DV, Meloy, JR, Mullen, PE, et al. Abnormal attentions toward the British Royal Family: factors associated with approach and escalation. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(3):329340.Google ScholarPubMed
James, DV, Kerrigan, TR, Forfar, R, Farnham, FR, Preston, LF. The fixated threat assessment centre: preventing harm and facilitating care. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2010;21(4):521536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalora, MJ, Baumgartner, JV, Zimmerman, WJ, et al. An epidemiological assessment of problematic contacts to members of congress. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47(6):13601364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, DV, Farnham, FR, Wilson, SP. The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre. In: Meloy, JR, Hoffmann, J, eds. International Handbook of Threat Assessment . New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013:299.Google Scholar
James, DV, Farnham, FR. Outcome and Efficacy of Interventions by a Public Figure Threat Assessment and Management Unit: a mirrored study of concerning behaviors and police contacts before and after intervention. Behav Sci Law. 2016;34(5):660680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, PE, Pathé, M, Purcell, R. Stalkers and Their Victims. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
Farnham, FR, Busch, KG. Introduction to this Issue: international perspectives on the protection of public officials. Behav Sci Law. 2016;34(5):597601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scalora, MJ, Zimmerman, WJ, Wells, D. Use of threat assessment for the protection of the United States congress. In: Meloy, JR, Sheridan, L, Hoffman, J, eds. Stalking, Threatening and Attacking Public Figures: A Psychological and Behvioral Analysis . New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008:425434.Google Scholar
Pathé, M. Stalking public figures: the fixated loner. In: WSG, Petherick, ed. The Psychology of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior . San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2017:295320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zona, MA, Palarea, RE, Lane, J. Psyhciatric diagnosis and the offender-victim typology of stalking. In: Meloy, JR, ed. The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives . San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998:7084.Google Scholar
Dietz, P, Martell, DA. Mentally Disordered Offenders in Pursuit of Celebrities and Politicans . US Department of Justice National Institute of Justice,1989.Google Scholar
Dietz, P, Matthews, DB, Martell, DA, Stewart, TM, Hrouda, DR, Warren, J. Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States congress. J Forensic Sci. 1991;36(5):14451468.Google ScholarPubMed
Fein, R, Vossekuil, B. Assassination in the United States: an operational study of recent assassins, attackers, and near-lethal approachers. J Forensic Sci. 1999;44(2):321333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, DV. Protecting the prominent? A research journey with Paul Mullen. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2010;20(3):242250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkbride, JB, Errazuriz, A, Croudace, TJ, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England. In: University of Cambridge IoPatM, Kings College London, eds. Department of Health Policy Research Programme; London 2012.Google Scholar
James, D. The Fixated, Lone Actors and Grievance Fuelled Violence. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia Pacific Association of Threat Assessment Professionals; 2015.Google Scholar
Dietz, P, Martell, DA. Commentary: approaching and stalking public figures—a prerequisite to attack. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2010;38(3):341348.Google Scholar
James, DV, Mullen, PE, Meloy, JR, et al. The role of mental disorder in attacks on European politicians 1990-2004. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116(5):334344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, J, Meloy, JR, Guldimann, A, Ermer, A. Attacks on German public figures, 1968-2004: warning behaviors, potentially lethal and non-lethal acts, psychiatric status, and motivations. Behav Sci Law. 2011;29(2):155179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, DV, Mullen, PE, Pathe, MT, et al. Attacks on the British Royal family: the role of psychotic illness. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(1):5967.Google ScholarPubMed
Laschi, MLC. Le délit politique. Paper presented at: Actes du Premier Congrès International d'Anthropo; ogie Criminelle 1885; Rome.Google Scholar
Regis, E. Les Régicides Dans L'histoire et Dans le Présent: Etude Médico-Psychologique. Lyon, France: A. Storck; 1890.Google Scholar
van der Meer, BB, Bootsma, L, Meloy, R. Disturbing communications and problematic approaches to the Dutch Royal Family. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2012;23(5–6):571589.Google Scholar
Staatens Offentliga Utredningar (Government Official Reports). Jakten på makten. Betänkande av Kommittén om hot och våld mot förtroendevalda [The Quest for Power. Report of the Committee on Threats and Violence Against Elected Officials]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritzes; 2006.Google Scholar
Adams, SJ, Hazelwood, TE, Pitre, NL, Bedard, TE, Landry, SD. Harassment of members of parliament and the legislative assemblies in Canada by individuals believed to be mentally disordered. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2009;20(6):801814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, DV, Farnham, FR, Sukhwal, S, Jones, K, Carlisle, J, Henley, S. Aggressive/intrusive behaviours, harassment and stalking of members of the United Kingdom parliament: a prevalence study and cross-national comparison. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016;27(2):177197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathé, M, Phillips, J, Perdacher, E, Heffernan, E. The harassment of Queensland members of parliament: a mental health concern. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2013; 21:18.Google Scholar
Bergland, N. Threats on the rise against politicians. News in English Norway. 2018.Google Scholar
Bjelland, HF, Bjørgo, T. Trusler og Trusselhendelser mot Politikere: En Spørreundersøkelse Blant Norske Stortingsrepresentanter og Regjeringsmedlemmer [Threats and Threat Events Against Politicians: A Survey of Norwegian Members of Parliament and Government Officials] . Oslo: Politihogskolen; 2014.Google Scholar
Every-Palmer, S, Barry-Walsh, J, Pathe, M. Harassment, stalking, threats and attacks targeting New Zealand politicians: a mental health issue. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(7):634641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, DV, Sukhwal, S, Farnham, FR, et al. Harassment and stalking of members of the United Kingdom parliament: associations and consequences. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016;27(3):309330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathé, MT, Lowry, T, Haworth, DJ, et al. Assessing and managing the threat posed by fixated persons in Australia. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2015;26(4):425438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New South Wales State Corner. Inquest into the Deaths Arising from the Lindt Café siege: Findings and Recommendations. Glebe, Australia: Department of Justice NSW Government; 2017.Google Scholar
Riddle, FJ, Ferriman, M, Farmer, DG, Baillie, KM. Towards a national strategy for managing fixated persons in Australia. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2019;26(3):457467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kegel, AH. The municipal psychopathic laboratory. Chicago Health. 1930;24:114120.Google Scholar
Oliver, JR. Foursquare. The Story of a Fourfold Life. New York, NY: MacMillan; 1929.Google Scholar
James, D. Court diversion in perspective. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40:529538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capellan, JA. Lone Wolf terrorist or deranged shooter? A study of ideological active shooter events in the United States, 1970–2014. Stud Confl Terror. 2015;38(6):395413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guildmann, A, Brunner, R, Schmid, H, Habermeyer, E. Supporting threat management with forensic expert knowledge: protecting public officials and private individuals. Behav Sci Law. 2016;34(5):645659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkki, L. School shootings and lone actor terrorism. In: Michael, F, ed. Understanding Lone Actor Terrorism: Past Experience, Future Outlook, and Response Strategies . Abingdon: Routledge; 2016.Google Scholar
Lankford, A. A comparative analysis of suicide terrorists and rampage, workplace, and school shooters in the United States from 1990 to 2010. Homicide Studies. 2012;17(3):255274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, CMS, Van Son, B. Charactersitics of lone wolf violent offenders: a comparison of assassins and school attackers. Perspect Terror. 2013;7(1):424.Google Scholar
Mullen, PE. The autogenic (self-generated) massacre. Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(3):311323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, PE, Pathe, M. Assessing and managing threats to commit a massacre. Aust N Z Journal Psychiatry. 2018;52(8):732736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corner, E, Gill, P. A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism. Law Hum Behav. 2015;39(1):2334.Google ScholarPubMed
Gill, P, Corner, E. There and back again: the study of mental disorder and terrorist involvement. Am Psychol. 2017;72(3):231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, P, Horgan, J, Deckert, P. Bombing alone: tracing the motivations and antecedent behaviors of lone-actor terrorists. J Forensic Sci. 2014;59(2):425435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, DV, Hurlow, J. A 21st century truism. BJPsych Bull. 2016;40(6):346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pathé, MT, Haworth, DJ, Goodwin, T-a, et al. Establishing a joint agency response to the threat of lone-actor grievance-fuelled violence. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2017;29(1):3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, P. Lona-Actor Terrorists: A Behavioural Analysis. London, UK: Routledge; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meloy, JR. Approaching and attacking public figures: a contemporary analysis of communications and behavior. J Threat Assess Manag. 2014;1(4):243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meloy, JR, Hoffman, J, James, D. The role of warning behaviors in threat assessment: an exploration and suggested typology. Behav Sci Law. 2012;30(3):256279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coggins, MH, Pynchon, MR, Dvoskin, JA. Integrating research and practice in federal law enforcement: secret service applications of behavioral science expertise to protect the president. Behav Sci Law. 1998;16(1):5170.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, D. Threat assessment in college settings. Change. 2010;42(1):815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vossekuil, B, Fein, RA, Berglund, JM. Threat assessment: assessing the risk of targeted violence. J Threat Assess Manag. 2015;2(3–4):243254.Google Scholar
Weine, S, Eisenman, DP, Jackson, T, Kinsler, J, Polutnik, C. Utilizing mental health professionals to help prevent the next attacks. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017;29(4):334340.Google ScholarPubMed
Voerman, B. Netherlands National Police Threat Management Team. Paper presented at: Annual Conference of the European Network of Public Figure Threat Assessment Agencies; 2015; London, UK.Google Scholar
Government, HM. Revised Prevent Duty Guidance for England and Wales. London, UK: The Stationery Office; 2015.Google Scholar
Pathé, M, Haworth, DJ, Lowry, TJ, et al. A model for managing the mentally ill fixated person at major events. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(7):610615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D, MacKenzie, RD, Farnham, F. Communications Threat Assessment Protocol-25: Guidelines for the Intial Assessment of Problematic Communications. Kent, MI: Theseus LLP; 2014.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, RD, McEwan, TE, Pathé, M, James, D, Ogloff, JR, Mullen, PE. Stalking Risk Profile: Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Stalkers. Melbourne, Australia: StalkInc Pty Ltd, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science and Monash University; 2009.Google Scholar
3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Fixated Threat Assessment Centers: preventing harm and facilitating care in public figure threat cases and those thought to be at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Fixated Threat Assessment Centers: preventing harm and facilitating care in public figure threat cases and those thought to be at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Fixated Threat Assessment Centers: preventing harm and facilitating care in public figure threat cases and those thought to be at risk of lone-actor grievance-fueled violence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *