Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:44:19.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis and application of a porous composite material synthesized via an in situ technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Shu-Qin Zheng ,
Shao Ren ,
Hong-Xia Yu ,
Jian-Ce Zhang  and
Wei Zhu
Shu-Qin Zheng*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414006, Hunan, China Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Speciality Petrochemicals Catalysis and Separation, Yueyang 414000, Hunan, China
Shao Ren
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414006, Hunan, China
Hong-Xia Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414006, Hunan, China
Jian-Ce Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414006, Hunan, China Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Speciality Petrochemicals Catalysis and Separation, Yueyang 414000, Hunan, China
Wei Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang, 414006, Hunan, China
*
E-mail:zhengshuqin37@163.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Novel composite materials with wide pores were synthesized by an in situ technique using kaolin, palygorskite and pseudoboehmite as raw materials. The characterization results indicated that the synthesis components and conditions influenced the micro-, meso- and macro-porosity of the composite materials. The composites contained 53.5% zeolite Y and had much larger specific surface areas and pore volumes as well as significant hydrothermal stability. Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts were prepared based on the composite materials. The results indicated that the as-prepared catalysts possessed a unique pore structure which assisted in diffusion-controlled reactions. In addition, the attrition resistance, activity and hydrothermal stability of the catalyst studied were superior to those of a reference catalyst. The catalyst studied also exhibited excellent nickel and vanadium passivation performance, strong ‘bottoms upgrading’ selectivity and better gasoline and coke selectivity.

Keywords

composite materialFCC catalystopen pore structure
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , September 2015 , pp. 525 - 535
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S.M. & Woltermann, G.M. (1980) Zeolitized composite bodies and manufacture thereof. US Patent 4235753.Google Scholar
Brown, S.M., Durante, V.A., Reagan, W.J., Speronello & Barry, K. (1985) Fluid catalytic cracking catalyst comprising microspheres containing more than about 40 percent by weight Y-faujasite and methods for making. US Patent 4493902.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, C., García, R., Arriagada, R., Yánez, J. & Garland, M.T. (2006) Cr(III) exchange on zeolites obtained from kaolin and natural mordenite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 88, 220–231.Google Scholar
Dight, L.B., Bogert, D.C. & Leskowicz, M.A. (1991) Ultra high zeolite content FCC catalysts and method for making same from microspheres composed of a mixture of calcined kaolin clays. US Patent 5023220.Google Scholar
Groen, J.C. & Moulijn, J.A. (2006) Desilication: on the controlled generation of mesoporosity in MFI zeolites. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 16, 2121–2131.Google Scholar
Harding, R.H., Peters, A.W. & Nee J.R.D. (2001) New developments in FCC catalyst technology. Applied Catalysis A. General, 221, 389–396.Google Scholar
Hosseinpour, N., Mortazavi, Y., Bazyari, A. & Khodadadi, A. A. (2009) Synergetic effects of Y-zeolite and amorphous silica-alumina as main FCC catalyst components on triisopropylbenzene cracking and coke formation. Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 171—179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen C.J.H., Madsen, C., Houzvicka, J., Schmidt, I. & Carlsson, A. (2000) Mesoporous zeolite single crystals. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 122, 7116–7117.Google Scholar
Lee, H.J., Kim, Y.M., Kweon, O.S. & Kim, I.J. (2007) Crystal growing and reaction kinetics of large NaX zeolite crystals. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 27, 581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Roy, L., Taggart, E. & Ribaud, G.L. (1964) Process for producing molecular sieve bodies. US Patent 3119659.Google Scholar
Liu, H.H., Zhao, H.J., Gao, X.H. & Ma, J.T. (2006) Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of a novel resid FCC catalyst based on in situ synthesis on kaolin microspheres. Catalysis Letters, 110, 229–234.Google Scholar
Mitchell B.R. (1980) Metal contamination of cracking catalysts. 1. Synthetic metals deposition on fresh catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development, 19, 209—213.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, K. & Inagaki, S. (2000) Control of the microporosity within the pore walls of ordered mesopor¬ous silica SBA-15. Chemical Communications, 21, 2121–2122.Google Scholar
Ogura, M., Shinomiya, S.Y., Tateno, J., Nara, Y., Kikuchi, E. & Matsukata, M. (2000) Formation of uniform mesopores in ZSM-5 Zeolite through treatment in alkaline solution. Chemistry Letters, 29, 882–883.Google Scholar
Önal, M., Yilmaz, H. & Sarikaya Y (2008) Some physicochemical properties of the white sepiolite known as pipestone from Eskigehir, Turkey. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 511–519.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P., Forni, L. & Hodnett, B.K. (2001) The role of acid site strength in the Beckmann rearrangement. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40, 1471–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrylak, L., Likhnyovskyi, R., Vypyraylenko, V., Leboda, R. & Skubiszewska-Zieba 1 (2001) Adsorption properties of zeolite-containing microspheres and FCC catalysts based on Ukrainian kaolin. Adsorption Science & Technology, 19, 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, Y., Gao, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Zheng, L., Li, Q., Mo, Z., Duan, L., Zhang, X. & Song, L. (2015) Measurements and distinguishment of mass transfer processes in fluid catalytic cracking catalyst particles by uptake and frequency response method. Catalysis Today, 245, 147–154.Google Scholar
Sun, S.H., Zheng, S.Q., Wang, Z.F., Zhang, Y.H. & Ma, J.T. (2005) Sulphur reduction additive prepared from caustic-modified kaolin. Clay Minerals, 40, 311–316.Google Scholar
Takahasi, T., Ueno, K. & Kai T (1991) Vapor phase reaction of cyclohexanone oxime over boria modified HSZM-5 zeolites. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 69, 1096–1099.Google Scholar
Teyssier, L., Thomas, M., Bouchy, C., Martens, J.A. & Guillon, E. (2007) Liquid chromatography method for quantification of surface connected mesoporosity in ultrastable Y zeolites. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 100, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoef, M.J. & Kooyman, P.J. (2001) Partial transform¬ation of MCM-41 material into zeolites: formation of nanosized MFI type crystallites. Chemistry of Materials, 13, 683–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P., Shen, B.J. & Gao, J.S. (2007) Synthesis of MAZ/ ZSM-5 composite zeolite and its catalytic perform¬ance in FCC gasoline aromatization. Catalysis Communications, 8, 1161–1166.Google Scholar