Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:27:52.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the adsorption mechanisms of NH3, H2S and SO2 on sepiolite using molecular dynamics simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2022

Ji Zhou
Affiliation:
College of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, China Institute of Rheological Mechanics, Xiangtan University, 411105, Xiangtan, Hunan, China
Zuozhang Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Rheological Mechanics, Xiangtan University, 411105, Xiangtan, Hunan, China
Ana C.S. Alcântara
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, 65080-805 São Luís - MA, Brazil
Yanhuai Ding*
Affiliation:
College of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Engineering, Yongzhou, 425199, China Institute of Rheological Mechanics, Xiangtan University, 411105, Xiangtan, Hunan, China

Abstract

The adsorption mechanisms of hazardous gas molecules such as NH3, H2S and SO2 on sepiolite have not yet been elucidated. Therefore, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed to investigate the adsorption behaviour of sepiolite towards NH3, H2S and SO2. A calculation model for sepiolite containing structural and zeolitic water molecules was constructed in this study. The adsorption sites and molecular configurations of the hazardous gases in the sepiolite channels were studied. The radial distribution function was employed to evaluate the interactions between the gas molecules and sepiolite. The results show that the order of adsorption capacity of sepiolite for the gases is as follows: SO2 > H2S > NH3. These three types of gas molecules absorbed in the channel nanopores of sepiolite exhibit different atomic configurations. The diffusion coefficients of the gas molecules in the channels decreased in the following order: NH3 > H2S > SO2. In addition, the diffusion coefficients were affected significantly by the ratio of the number of gas/water molecules. This study provides new perspectives for understanding the molecular processes responsible for the adsorption properties of sepiolite.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Chun Hui Zhou

References

Abbaspour, M., Akbarzadeh, H. & Valizadeh, Z. (2018) Au–Ir nanoalloy nucleation during the gas-phase condensation: a comprehensive MD study including different effects. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 5, 14451457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcântara, A.C., Darder, M., Aranda, P. & Ruiz-Hitzky, E. (2012) Zein–fibrous clays biohybrid materials. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2012, 52165224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alver, B.E. (2018) Hydrogen adsorption on natural and sulphuric acid treated sepiolite and bentonite. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 831838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balci, S. (1999) Effect of heating and acid pre-treatment on pore size distribution of sepiolite. Clay Minerals, 34, 647655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashir, S., Ali, U., Shaaban, M., Gulshan, A.B., Iqbal, J., Khan, S. et al. (2020) Role of sepiolite for cadmium (Cd) polluted soil restoration and spinach growth in wastewater irrigated agricultural soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 258, 110020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecilia, J., Vilarrasa-García, E., Cavalcante, C. Jr, Azevedo, D., Franco, F. & Rodríguez-Castellón, E. (2018) Evaluation of two fibrous clay minerals (sepiolite and palygorskite) for CO2 capture. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6, 45734587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornejo, J. & Hermosin, M. (1988) Structural alteration of sepiolite by dry grinding. Clay Minerals, 23, 391398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, J.A., Uguina, M.A., Sotelo, J.L., Ruíz, B. & Rosário, M. (2007) Carbon dioxide/methane separation by adsorption on sepiolite. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 16, 235243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, C., Jiang, Y., Fan, Z., Zhao, S., Ouyang, D., Tan, J. et al. (2019) Sepiolite-based separator for advanced Li-ion batteries. Applied Surface Science, 484, 446452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, B. & Esenli, F. (2022) Sepiolite as an efficient adsorbent for ethylene gas. Clay Minerals, 56, 222228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayazi, M., Afzali, D., Ghanei-Motlagh, R. & Iraji, A. (2019) Synthesis of novel sepiolite–iron oxide–manganese dioxide nanocomposite and application for lead (II) removal from aqueous solutions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 1889318903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitaroni, L.B., Venâncio, T., Tanaka, F.H., Gimenez, J.C., Costa, J.A. & Cruz, S.A. (2019) Organically modified sepiolite: thermal treatment and chemical and morphological properties. Applied Clay Science, 179, 105149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Romero, E. & Suárez, M. (2013) Sepiolite–palygorskite: textural study and genetic considerations. Applied Clay Science, 86, 129144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Romero, E. & Suárez, M. (2018) A structure-based argument for non-classical crystal growth in natural clay minerals. Mineralogical Magazine, 82, 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, Y., Tang, L., Hussain, B., Usman, M., Liu, L., Ulhassan, Z. et al. (2021) Sepiolite clay: a review of its applications to immobilize toxic metals in contaminated soils and its implications in soil–plant system. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 23, 101598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L., Li, G., Lv, S., Gao, J., Kowalski, K.J., Valentin, J. & Alexiadis, A. (2020) Self-healing behavior of asphalt system based on molecular dynamics simulation. Construction and Building Materials, 254, 119225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W., Jiang, Y., Zhao, S., Peng, J., Qin, W., Ouyang, D. & Ding, Y. (2020) Novel sepiolite-based materials for lithium- and sodium-ion storage. Energy Technology, 8, 1901262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W., Han, Y., Jiang, Y., Xu, F., Ouyang, D., Sun, J. et al. (2021) Preparation and electrochemical properties of sepiolite supported Co3O4 nanoparticles. Applied Clay Science, 203, 106020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, Y. & Hayakawa, M. (1992) Elimination of impurity in sepiolite and it's surface area. Journal of the Clay Science Society of Japan, 31, 196201 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Lamichhane, T.R. & Ghimire, M.P. (2021) Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 main protease and inhibitor interactions using dihedral angle distributions and radial distribution function. Heliyon, 7, e08220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Largo, F., Haounati, R., Akhouairi, S., Ouachtak, H., El Haouti, R., El Guerdaoui, A. et al. (2020) Adsorptive removal of both cationic and anionic dyes by using sepiolite clay mineral as adsorbent: experimental and molecular dynamic simulation studies. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 318, 114247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y. & Wang, A. (2022) From structure evolution of palygorskite to functional material: a review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 333, 111765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniz-Miranda, F., Lodesani, F., Tavanti, F., Presti, D., Malferrari, D. & Pedone, A. (2016) Supercritical CO2 confined in palygorskite and sepiolite minerals: a classical molecular dynamics investigation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 120, 2694526954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, P., Guo, L., Qi, Y., Cheng, M. & Jing, Z. (2021) Hydrothermal solidification of sepiolite into a cemented sepiolite aggregate for humidity regulation and formaldehyde removal. Clay Minerals, 55, 320328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabah, E., Çinar, M. & Çelik, M.S. (2007) Decolorization of vegetable oils: adsorption mechanism of β-carotene on acid-activated sepiolite. Food Chemistry, 100, 16611668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, M. & García-Romero, E. (2013) Sepiolite–palygorskite: a continuous polysomatic series. Clays and Clay Minerals, 61, 461472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T., Xiao, J.J., Liu, Q., Zhao, F. & Xiao, H.M. (2014) Comparative study on structure, energetic and mechanical properties of a ε-CL-20/HMX cocrystal and its composite with molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2, 1389813904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yebra-Rodríguez, A., Martín-Ramos, J.D., Del Rey, F., Viseras, C. & López-Galindo, A. (2003) Effect of acid treatment on the structure of sepiolite. Clay Minerals, 38, 353360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, M., Gao, G., Hu, X., Luo, X., Huang, Y., Jin, B. & Liang, Z. (2018) Premodified sepiolite functionalized with triethylenetetramine as an effective and inexpensive adsorbent for CO2 capture. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57, 61896200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, S.-Q., Han, Y., Huang, X.-H., Dai, Y.-L., Qian, D., Zhang, J.-C. & Ren, S. (2010) Acid and aluminium modification of sepiolite and its application in FCC catalysis. Clay Minerals, 45, 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Lu, X. & Boek, E.S. (2016) Confined water in tunnel nanopores of sepiolite: insights from molecular simulations. American Mineralogist, 101, 713718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zhou et al. supplementary material

Zhou et al. supplementary material

Download Zhou et al.  supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB