Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-tmfhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T05:17:30.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fe3+/Al3+ partitioning between tetrahedral and octahedral sites in dioctahedral smectites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. Decarreau  and
S. Petit
A. Decarreau*
Affiliation:
Université de Poitiers, CNRS UMR 7285 IC2MP, HydrASA, 6 rue Michel Brunet, F-86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France
S. Petit
Affiliation:
Université de Poitiers, CNRS UMR 7285 IC2MP, HydrASA, 6 rue Michel Brunet, F-86073 Poitiers Cedex 9, France
*
*E-mail: alaindecarreau@orange.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distribution of Al3+ and Fe3+ between octahedral and tetrahedral sites of dioctahedral smectites was shown to be controlled by a partition coefficient Kd(4/6) = [(Fe3+)4×(Al3+)6]/[(Fe3+)6×(Al3+)4]. The Kd(4/6) value is near 0.006 for natural dioctahedral smectites, formed between 2 and ~100°C, and near 0.0174 for smectites synthesized at 200°C. These Kd(4/6) values, obtained from both chemical and spectroscopic data, were consistent with those calculated using the ionic radii of cations and Brice’s model (Brice, 1975). The partition coefficient approach explained well why for natural and synthetic dioctahedral smectites no tetrahedral Fe3+ is detected when the total Fe3+ content is below 3 atoms per unit cell (24 oxygen atoms).

Keywords

iron smectitestetrahedral Fe3+partition coefficient
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 49 , Issue 5 , December 2014 , pp. 657 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrieux, P. & Petit, S. (2010) Hydrothermal synthesis of dioctahedral smectites: The Al-Fe chemical series. Part I. Influence of experimental conditions. Applied Clay Science, 48, 5–17.Google Scholar
Bain, D.C. & Smith, B.F.L. (1992) Chemical analysis. In: Clay Mineralogy: Spectroscopic and Chemical Determinative Methods. (M.J. Wilson, editor), Chapmann & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Blundy, J.D. & Wood, B.J. (1994) Prediction of crystalmelt partition coefficients from elastic moduli. Nature, 372, 452–454.Google Scholar
Brice, J.C. (1975) Some thermodynamic aspects of the growth of strained crystals. Journal of Crystal Growth, 28, 249–283.Google Scholar
Christidis, G. (2006) Genesis and compositional heterogeneity of smectites. Part I.I. Alteration of basic pyroclastic rocks. A case study from the Troodos Ophiolitic complex, Cyprus. American Mineralogist, 91, 685–701.Google Scholar
Christidis, G. & Dunham, A.C. (1993) Compositional variations in smectites: Part I. Alteration of intermediate volcanic rocks. A case study from Milos Island, Greece. Clay Minerals, 28, 255–273.Google Scholar
Christidis, G. & Dunham, A.C. (1997) Compositional variations in smectites. Part II: Alteration of acidic precursors, a case study from Milos Island, Greece. Clay Minerals, 32, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comodi, P. & Zanazzi, P.F. (1995) High-pressure structural study of muscovite. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 22, 170–177.Google Scholar
Decarreau, A., Petit, S., Martin, F., Farges, F., Vieillard, P. & Joussein, E. (2008) Hydrothermal synthesis, between 75 and 150°C, of high charge ferric nontronites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 322–337.Google Scholar
Dekov, V.M., Kamenov, G.D., Stummeyer, J., Thiry, M., Savelli, C., Shanks, W.C., Fortin, D., Kuzmann, E. & Vértes, A. (2007) Hydrothermal nontronite formation at Eolo Seamount (Aeolian volcanic arc, Tyrrhenian Sea). Chemical Geology, 245, 103–119.Google Scholar
Gates, W.P. (2005) Infrared spectroscopy and the chemistry of dioctahedral smectites. Pp. 125–168 in: The Application of Vibrational Spectroscopy to Clay Minerals and Layered Double Hydroxides (J.T. Kloprogge, editor). CMS Workshop Lectures, Aurora, Colorado.Google Scholar
Gates, W.P., Slade, P.G., Manceau, A. & Lanson, B. (2002) Site occupancies by iron in nontronites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 223––239.Google Scholar
Gatta, D., Rotiroti, N., Lotti, P., Pavese, P. & Curetti, N. (2010) Structural evolution of a 2M1 phengite mica up to 11 GPa: an in situ single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 37, 581–591.Google Scholar
Gaudin, A., Petit, S., Rose, J., Martin, F., Decarreau, A., Noack, Y. & Borscheneck, D. (2004) The accurate crystal chemistry of ferric smectites from the lateritic nickel ore of Murrin Murrin (Western Australia). II. Spectroscopic (IR and E.A. S) approaches. Clay Minerals, 39, 453–467.Google Scholar
Goodman, B.A., Russell, J.D., Fraser, A.D. & Woodhams, F.W.D. (1976) A Mössbauer and I. spectroscopic study of the structure of nontronite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 24, 53–59.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M. & Finger, L.W. (1979) Bulk modulusvolume relationship for cation-anion polyhedra. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 6723–6728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffert, M., Perseil, A., Hekinian, R., Choukroune, P., Needham, H.D., Francheteau, J. & Le Pichon, X. (1978) Hydrothermal deposits sampled by diving saucer in transform fault “A” near 37°N on the Mid- Atlantic Ridge, FAMOUS area. Oceanologica Acta, 1, 73–86.Google Scholar
Köster, H.M., Ehrlicher, U., Gilg, H.A., Jordan, R., Murad, E. & Onnick, K. (1999) Mineralogical and chemical characteristics of five nontronites and Fe-rich smectites. Clay Minerals, 34, 579–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, S., Decarreau, A., Gates, W., Andrieux, P. & Grauby, O. (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis of dioctahedral smectites: The Al-Fe3+ chemical series. Part II: Crystal-chemistry. Applied Clay Science (in press).Google Scholar
Poulet, F., Bibring, J.P., Mustard, J.F., Gendrin, A., Mangold, N., Langevin, Y., Arvidson, R.E., Gondet, B., Gomez, C. & the Omega team (2005) Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for early Martian climate. Nature, 438, 623–627.Google Scholar
Saxena, S.K. (1973) Thermodynamics of Rock-forming Crystalline Solutions, 188 pp. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.D. (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 751–767.Google Scholar
Stucki, J.W. (2013) Properties and behavior of iron in clay minerals. Pp 559–612 in: Handbook of Clay Sciences (F. Bergaya & G. Lagaly, editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Van Westernen, W., Blundy, J. & Wood, B. (1999) Crystal-chemical controls on trace element partitioning between garnet and anhydrous silicate melt. American Mineralogist, 84, 838–847.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.E. & Pollard, L.D. (1973) The Chemistry of Clay Minerals. Developments in Sedimentology, vol. 15, 213 pp. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.J. (2013) Sheet Silicates: Smectites, Clay Minerals (Beidellite, pp 257–277; Nontronite, pp 278–299) in: Rock-Forming Minerals, vol 3C (Deer, Howie & Zussman). The Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Wolters, F., Lagaly, G., Kahr, G., Nueesch, R. & Emmerich, K. (2009) A comprehensive characterization of dioctahedral smectites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 57, 115–133.Google Scholar
Wood, B.J. & Blundy, J.B. (1997) A predictive model for rare earth element partitioning between clinopyroxene and anhydrous silicate melt. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 129, 166–181.Google Scholar