1 Assuming that Solazzi was not right to tear the whole text to shreds on the ground that it was heavily glossed.
2Pace Muirhead in his Gaius, who seems to have been alone in maintaining that it could.
3 Böcking in his fifth edition of Gaius, 1876, read [Etiam lege Aelia Sentia] at the beginning of § 85. Huschke, , in Studien des röm. Rechts, i, 1830, at pp. 179 ff., held likewise, giving good reasons and mentioning yet earlier scholars who had believed the same; but by the time of his second edition of Gaius, 1873, he had changed his mind, and now read [E lege Latina], with explanations which I do not find clear. Castello, C. in Studi Solazzi, pp. 242 ff., proposed the lex Minicia, which seems less suitable. David and Nelson in their commentary do not refer to the old view that the lex was Aelia Sentia.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.