Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:00:49.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highlights of the Hungarian Reformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

William Toth
Affiliation:
South Norwalk, Conn.

Extract

I propose, in this essay, to present some of the more significant highlights of the Reformation in Hungary. Significantly, little is known with regard to what transpired within the borders of what was the last frontier of the Reformation in eastern Europe. If what Lindsay says is true—and it is definitely—, i.e., “The rise, continuance, and decline of these Churches (in Bohemia, Hungary and the neighbouring lands) are so inseparably connected with the peculiar social and political conditions of the countries, that no adequate or informing account of them could be given without largely exceeding the limits of space at my disposal,” the task should have appeared all the more engaging. The fact is, however, that the difficulties of mastering the Hungarian language have stood as a perpetual barrier to any intensive study of the Hungarian Reformation among scholars outside the land, and those within have devoted lamentably little energy to the task of attracting the attention of the outside world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lindsay, Thomas M., The Reformation in the Lanas Beyond Germany. Preface, viii (New York, 1907).Google Scholar

2 Some of the books available to scholars have been the following: Bod, Peter, Historia Hungarorum Hcclesiastica, I–III (Lugduni Batavorum, 18881890).Google ScholarLampe, Adolph, Historia Ecclesiae Reformatae in Hungaria et Transylvania (Trajescti ad Rhenum, 1728).Google ScholarBauhofer, George, The History of the Protestant Church in Hungary (London, 1854).Google Scholar In German, the same under title: Geschichte der evang. Kirche in Ungarn (Berlin, 1854).Google ScholarTeutsch, F.. Geschichte der evangelischen Kirche in Siebenbürgen, I–II (Hermannstadt, 19211922).Google Scholar In Hungarian — Zsillinszky, M., A Magyarhoni protestáns egyház története (Budapest, 1907).Google ScholarBalogh, F., A magyar protestáns egyházak története (Debrecen, 195).Google ScholarRévéz, I., Magyar Reformatus Egyháztörténet (Debrecen, 1938).Google ScholarZoványi, J., A reformáczió Magyarországon 1565–ig (Budapest, 1921).Google Scholar

3 Révész, , Magyar Református Egyhátörténet, 44.Google Scholar

4 Sólyom, J., Luiher és Magyarország (Budapest, 1933), 19.Google Scholar

5 Balogh, Francis, “History of the Reformed Church of Hungary,” published in The Reformed Church Review (07, 1906), 299.Google Scholar

6 Szabó, J. S., A Perényiek a magyar reformáció szolgálatában (Budapest, 1923).Google Scholar

7 Quoted by Wilbur, E. M., Our Unitarian Heritage (Boston, 1925), 214.Google Scholar This book contains an excellent account of the Unitarian movement in Hungary.

8 A contemporary account of these times may be found in the reports of Baron Burgio, papal nuncio to Hungary, edited by Bartoniek, Emma under the title Mohács Magyarországa (Budapest, 1926).Google Scholar

9 Liske, , Polnische Diplomatie in 1556, 3536.Google Scholar Quoted in Jansen, , History of the German People, V, 16.Google Scholar

10 Zsillinszky, , A Magyarhoni protestáns egyház története, 47.Google Scholar

11 Révész, , Magyar Református Egyháztörténet, 43.Google Scholar

12 Karácsonyi, J., Magyarország Egyháztörténete (Nagyvárad, 1915), 118.Google Scholar

13 Abel, J., Magyarországi humanisták és a Dunai Tudós Társaság (Budapest, 1880), 5.Google Scholar

14 Among the forward looking, conciliating, liberal members of the Council of Trent in 1561 was Andreas Dudich, who later came to embrace the Protestant cause. Thus, a strain of humanistic liberalism was present even in the Catholic Church of the Reformation period in Hungary.

15 Révész, , Magyar Református Egyháztörténet, 40ff.Google Scholar

16 Földváry, L., Adlékok a dunamelléki ev. ref. egyházkerület történetéhez (Budapest, 1898), 13.Google Scholar

17 Pokoly, J., Az erdélyi református egyház története (Budapest, 1904), 1215.Google Scholar

18 Payr, S., Cordatus Konrád Budai pap, Luther jó barátja (Budapest, 1928).Google Scholar

19 Fabö, A.: Monumento, evangelicorum aug. conf. in Hunaaria historica (Pest, 1865), III, 272, 288, 296.Google Scholar

20 Vier Tröstliche Psalmen an die Königin von Ungarn, 1526.Google Scholar

21 Fabritius, A.: Pemflinger Márk Szász Gróf élete (Budapest, 1875).Google Scholar

22 Zsillinszky, M., A magyar országgyülések vallásügyi tárgyalásai a reformációtól kezdve (Budapest, 1880), I.Google Scholar

23 Révész, I., A magyarországi protestántizmus történelme (Budapest, 1925), 13.Google Scholar

24 Acsády, I., Magyarország három részre oszlásának története (Budapest, 1897).Google Scholar

25 Erdélyi, L., Magyar történet (Budapest, 1936), I, 36.Google Scholar

26 R´vész, , Magyar református egyháztörténet, 312.Google Scholar

27 Bunyitay, , Karácsonyi, Rapaics, Egytiáztörténelmi emlékek (Budapest, 1912), V, 596.Google Scholar See also, Erdös, K., Bullinger Henrik és Fejértói János levelezéses (Debreczen, 1913), 13, 18.Google Scholar

28 Dankó, J. Jr. Sylvester Pannonius Erdösi, Leben, Schriften u. Bekenntnis (Wien, 1871.)Google Scholar

29 Révész, I. Sr., Dévai, Biró Mátyás elsö magyar reformátor életrajza és irodalmi müvei (Pest, 1863).Google ScholarRévész, I. Jr., Dévai Biró Mátyás tanitásai (Kolozsvár), 1915.Google Scholar

30 Skarieza, M., Vita Stephani Szegedini in Theologiae Sincerae Loci Communes by Stephen Kis of Szeged (Basel, 1585)Google Scholar, and also in Gerdesius, , Serinium Antiquarium, VI, (1761).Google ScholarFöldváry, L., Szegedi Kis István élete s a Tieza-Duna mellékeinek reformációja (Budapest, 1894).Google Scholar

31 Nagy, S., Sztárai Mihály élete és müvei (Budapest, 1883).Google Scholar

32 Balogh, F., Méliusz Péter hatása (Debreczen, 1866)Google Scholar, and also in Der Evang. Sonntagsbote (Wien, 1867).Google ScholarNovák, B., Méliusz Péter élete és munkái (Budapest, 1899).Google ScholarSoós, B., Méliuss Péter szentháromságtana (Debreczen, 1930).Google Scholar

33 Jakab, E., Dávid Ferencz emléke (Budapest, 1897).Google ScholarBotár, I., Dávid Ferencz és a vallásszabadság (Budapest, 1929).Google Scholar

34 Netoliczka, O., Honterus. Probleme u. Tatsachen. Beitrage-Teutsehe. (Hermannstadt, 1922.)Google Scholar

35 Thury, E., Bornemisza Péter élete és munkássága (Budapest, 1887).Google ScholarSchulek, T., Bornemisza Péter (Budapest, 1938).Google Scholar

36 Szabó, K., Huszár Gál életérőlGoogle Scholar, In Századok, 1867.Google ScholarThury, E., Huszár Gál (Budapest, 1894).Google Scholar

37 Kiss, E., Heltai Gáspár (Budapest, 1907).Google ScholarBorbély, I., Heltai Gáspár (Budapest, 1907).Google Scholar

38 Acsádi, I., A magyar nemzet története (Budapest, 1894), V. 194.Google Scholar

39 For the text and for a historical discussion of the confessions drawn up by Hungarian synods see Kiss, A., Magyar református zsinatok (Budapest, 1881).Google Scholar

40 Ribini, J., Memorabilia augustanae confessionis in regno Hungariae (Poson, 1787), I, 6770.Google Scholar

41 Balogh, , A magyart protestáns egyházak története, 23.Google Scholar

42 Kiss, , Magyar református zsinatok, 73285.Google Scholar

43 Horváth Gergely, Gradéczi Stansith, Historia colloquium Csepregiensis de Coena Domini (Bártfa, 1591Google Scholar, is a contemporary account, which has been translated into Hungarian in Thury, E., A dunántuli ref. egyházkerület története (Pápa, 1908), 7090.Google Scholar

44 Kanyaró, F., Unitáriusok Magyarországon (Kolozsvár, 1891).Google Scholar

45 This confession appears, by mistake, under the title Confessio polonica in the Corpus et Syntagma Confessionum Fidei edited by Heidegger, (Zürich, 1612 and 1654).Google Scholar

46 Meszlényi, A., A magyar jezsuiták a XVI. században (Budapest, 1931).Google Scholar