Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:32:13.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clement of Rome and Moralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Charles Merritt Nielsen
Charles Merritt Nielsen
Affiliation:
Colgate Rochester Divinity School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Clement of Rome has often been judged and found wanting by his Protestant interpreters. His letter is frequently presented as “a good illustration of the break between the New Testament faith and the Apostolic Fathers' lapse into moralism.” (And “moralism,” to put it mildly, is not always a pleasant word in Protestant theological circles.) Rudolf Knopf calls attention to the “rationalen Moralismus des Schreibens.” And Johannes Weiss says that “a strong moralism runs through all its expressions from the first page to the last.” When James Mackinnon gives us examples of Christian moralism in the sub-apostolic period, Clement is of course present in a prominent way, as indeed he is also significantly present when H. E. W. Turner mentions the “tradition of ‘sober moralism’ which was so notable a feature of late first-century and early second-century Christianity.” Moreover, A. C. McGiffert stands in the same tradition of interpretation when he says that for Clement “salvation is to be had only by obeying God and doing his will.” One could of course go on and on citing examples of this kind, but it seems unnecessary to do so, especially in view of the fact that a great many more illustrations are readily available in Thomas F. Torrance's The Doctrine of Grace in the Apostolic Fathers. Not only does Professor Torrance mention numerous scholars who stress the moralism of Clement, but also he himself comes to the conclusion that grace in I Clement appears to be an “enabling power granted to those who are worthy.” Clement “may use the language of election and justification, but the essentially Greek idea of the unqualified freedom of choice is a natural axiom in his thought, and entails a doctrine of ‘works,’ as Paul would have said.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 1962 , pp. 131 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Paul, Robert S., The Atonement and the Sacraments (New York and Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1960), p. 37.Google Scholar

2 Knopf, Rudolf, Die Lehre der zwölf Apostel Die zwei Klemensbriefe (Handbuch zum Neuen Testament. Ergänzungsb.: Die Apostolischen Väter 1–3 (Tübingen: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1920), p. 46.Google Scholar

3 Weiss, Johannes and Knopf, Rudolf, The History of Primitive Christianity, translated by four friends and edited by Grant, Frederick C. (New York: Wilson-Erickson, 1937), Vol. II, p. 853.Google Scholar

4 Mackinnon, James, From Christ to Constantine (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1936), pp. 218ff.Google Scholar

5 Turner, H. E. W., The Patristic Doctrine of Redemption (London: A. R. Mowbray & Co., 1952), p. 43.Google Scholar

6 Arthur McGiffert, Cushman, A History of Christian Thought (New York: Charles Seribner's Sons, 1950), Vol. I, p. 85.Google Scholar

7 Torrance, Thomas F., The Doctrine of Grace in the Apostolic Fathers (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1948), p. 54.Google Scholar

8 Loc. cit.

9 J. B. Lightfoot, The Apostolic Fathers, Part I. S. Clement of Rome (revised edition; London and New York: Macmillan and Co., 1890), Vol. I, pp. 95–96.

10 Clarke, W. K. Lowther, The First Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1937), p. 27.Google Scholar

11 Richardson, Cyril Charles (ed.), Early Christian Fathers (Vol. I of The Library of Christian Classics, ed. John Baillie, John T. McNeill and Henry P. Van Dusen; Philadelphia: The West-minster Press, 1953), p. 39.Google Scholar

12 Translations of I Clement are from Richardson, op. cit. By permission.

13 Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History, IV, 23. Note that Clement was also referred to or quoted by Hermas, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria and Origen.

14 Moody, Campbell N., The Mind of the Early Converts (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1920), p. 50.Google Scholar As Clement himself puts it in 62:1: “We have written enough to you, brothers, about what befits our religion and is most helpful to those who want reverently and uprightly to lead a virtuous life.”

15 Van Unnik, W. C., “Is I Clement 20 Purely Stoic?” Vigiliae Christianae, IV (1950), 181–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 184.

17 Torrance, op. cit., p. 50. Torrance fails to take account of Louis Sanders' work, L'Hellenisme Clément, de Saintde Rome et le Paulinisme (Louvain: Universitas Catholica Lovaniensis, 1943).Google Scholar Sanders makes the point that when Clément says we are not justified by ourselves, by our wisdom, insight or works, “… ces titres sont précisément ceux dont l'apocalyptique, authentique représentant du pharisaïsme, attendait la justification: par son exclusion expresse, Clément prend position contre la thèse pharisaïque de la justification par les oeuvres.” (pp. 161–2) Sanders has reference to l'Apocalypse syriaque de Baruch, among others. (pp. 151–3).

18 McGiffert, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 84.

19 Note Ernest De Witt Burton's discussion of dia with the genitive in A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians (The International Critical Commentary; Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1921), p. 6.Google Scholar

20 Kleist, James A., The Epistles of St. Clement of Rome and St. Ignatius of Antioch (Ancient Christian Writers, ed. Quasten, Johannes and Plumpe, Joseph C.; Westminster, Maryland: The Newman Bookshop, 1946), p. 116.Google Scholar

21 Lightfoot, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 169.

22 Kleist, op. cit., p. 116

23 Knopf, op. cit., p. 126.

24 Liang, Kwa Joe, Het Begrip Deemoed in I Clemens (Utrecht: N. V. v/h Kemink en Zoon, 1951).Google Scholar

25 Knopf, op. cit., p. 111.

26 Augustine, Enchiridion. Translated by Arand, Louis A. in St. Augustine: Faith, Hope and Charity (Ancient Christian Writers; Westminster, Maryland: The Newman Bookshop, 1947), paragraph 107, p. 101.Google Scholar

27 Knopf, op. cit., p. 46.

28 Ibid., p. 46.

29 Beker, Johan Christiaan, “Prophecy and the Spirit in the Apostolic Fathers” (unpublished Doctor's thesis, The University of Chicago, 1955), p. 199.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., p. 199.

31 Richardson, op. cit., p. 235.

32 Clarke asks: “But where are demons, ecstasy, Christian prophecy, Gnosticism, spiritual healing, and other factors in primitive Church life so much enshrined in this or that modern presentation of the facts?”, op. cit., p. 43.

33 Beker, op. cit., pp. 195ff.

34 Benoit, André, Le Baptěme Chrétien au Second Siècle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1953), pp. 82ff.Google Scholar

35 Beker, op. cit., p. 188.

36 Knopf, op. cit., pp. 178–182.

37 Benoit, op. cit., p. 85.

38 Beker, op. cit., p. 195.

39 Benoit, op. cit., p. 85.

40 Ibid., p. 85.

41 Torrance, op. cit., p. 53.

42 Ibid., p. 53.

43 Ibid., p. 54.

44 Knopf, op. cit., p. 122.

45 Clarke, op. cit., p. 104.

46 Beker, op. cit., p. 199.

47 Ibid., p. 197.

48 Ibid., p. 199.

49 Kelly, J. N. D., Early Christian Creeds (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1950), p. 66.Google Scholar

50 von Dobschütz, Ernst, Christian Life in the Primitive Church, trans. and ed. by Brenner, George and Morrison, W. D. (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1904), p. 205.Google Scholar

51 Richardson, op. cit., p. 23.

52 Adversus Haereses, III, iii, 3 in Richardson, op. cit., p. 373.

53 Beker, op. cit., p. 197.

54 Benoit, op. cit., p. 93.

55 Lawson, John, The Biblical Theology of Saint Irenaeus (London: The Epworth Press, 1948), p. 98.Google Scholar

56 Benoit, op. cit., pp. 92ff.

57 Ibid., p. 93.

58 Grant, Frederick C., An Introduction to New Testament Thought (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1950), p. 281.Google Scholar

59 Weiss and Knopf, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 632.

60 Ibid., p. 639.

61 Milburn, R. L. P., Early Christian Interpretations of History (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1954), p. 29.Google Scholar

62 Ibid., p. 29.

63 Ibid., p. 29.

64 Ibid., pp. 29–30.

65 Calvin, John, Institutes of the Christian Religion, trans. Beveridge, Henry (London: James Clarke & Co., 1949)Google Scholar, IV, i, 5.

66 Bultmann, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 188.

67 Beker, op. cit., p. 200.

68 Knopf, op. cit., p. 150.

69 I Clement 39:2.

70 Mackintosh, Hugh Ross, Types of Modern Theology (London: Nisbet and Co. Ltd., 1937), p. 266.Google Scholar

71 Richardson, Cyril Charles, The Doctrine of the Trinity (New York and Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1958), p. 8.Google Scholar

72 Lampe, G. W. H., “Early Patristic Eschatology.” Eschatology, Scottish Journal of Theology Occasional Papers, No. 2, ed. Torrance, T. F. and Reid, J. K. S. (Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd, Ltd., 1954), p. 17.Google Scholar