Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Where are the silences? A scoping review of child participatory research literature in the context of the Australian service system

  • Rebekah Grace (a1) (a2), Jenny Knight (a1) (a2), Kelly Baird (a1) (a2), Jonathan Ng (a1) (a2), Harry Shier (a3), Sarah Wise (a4), Tobia Fattore (a5), Tom McClean (a6), Gill Bonser (a7), Sarah Judd-Lam (a8) and Lynn Kemp (a1)...

Abstract

This paper presents a scoping review of the literature on child participatory research in Australia published in academic journals between 2000 and 2018. The review focused on research designed to engage with children and young people in the development, implementation and evaluation of services. A total of 207 papers were identified and distributed across eight service sectors: child protection and family law, community, disability, education, health, housing and homelessness, juvenile justice and mental health. The papers were reviewed against Shier’s participation matrix, demonstrating that almost all of the identified papers included children only as participants who contributed data to adult researchers. Only a small number of papers involved children and young people in the other phases of research, such as designing research questions, analysis and dissemination. There is a clear interest in the engagement of children and young people in service design and decision-making in Australia. This paper is intended to serve as a catalyst for discussion on where there are gaps and where further Australian research is needed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Where are the silences? A scoping review of child participatory research literature in the context of the Australian service system
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Where are the silences? A scoping review of child participatory research literature in the context of the Australian service system
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Where are the silences? A scoping review of child participatory research literature in the context of the Australian service system
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Rebekah Grace, Email: Rebekah.grace@westernsydney.edu.au

References

Hide All
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Toward a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 1932.
Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147150.
Ashkar, P. J., & Kenny, D. T. (2009). Young offenders’ perceptions of school. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(3), 355368.
Bell, J., Vromen, A., & Collin, P. (2008). Rewriting the rules for youth participation. Report to the National Youth Affairs Research Scheme.
Berrick, J. D., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). Children’s involvement in care order decision-making. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 128141.
Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia. Children & Youth Services Review, 33, 496501.
Bessell, S., & Mason, J. (2014). Putting the pieces in place: Children, communities and social capital in Australia. Canberra: ANU.
Cashmore, J. (2002). Promoting the participation of children and young people in care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(8), 837847.
Collings, S., Grace, R., & Llewellyn, G. (2016). Negotiating with gatekeepers in research with disadvantaged children: A case study of children of mothers with intellectual disability. Children and Society, 30, 499509.
Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2004). Accounting for young children’s competence in educational research: New perspectives on research ethics. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3549.
Davis, E., Davies, B., Cook, K., Waters, E., Gibbs, L., & Priest, N. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of barriers to social inclusion for children: A qualitative study using child-centred methods. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 10(1), 4252.
Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2002). Who’s ready for what? Young children starting school. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(1), 6789.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2016). Children’s understandings of well-being: Towards a child standpoint. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ford, K. (2011). ‘I didn’t really like it, but it sounded exciting’. Admission to hospital for surgery from the perspectives of children. Journal of Child Health Care, 15(4), 250260.
Fraser, S., Lewis, V., Kellett, M., Ding, S., & Robinson, C. (Eds.). (2004). Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Goodwin, S., & Young, A. (2013). Ensuring children and young people have a voice in neighbourhood community development. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 344357.
Graham, A., & Fitzgerald, R. M. (2010). Children’s participation in research: Some possibilities and constraints in the current Australian research environment. Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 133147.
International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) (2013) Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.
James, A., & Prout, A. (2015). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Routledge.
Kellett, M. (2010). Rethinking children and research: Attitudes in contemporary society. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2014). Researching children: Research on, with, and by children. In Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being. Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (2nd ed, pp. 27572796). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Moore, T., McArthur, M., & Noble-Carr, D. (2008). Too important to ignore: Children’s views on homelessness. Parity, 21(8), 20.
Nathan, S., Kemp, L., Bunde-Birouste, A., MacKenzie, J., Evers, C., & Shwe, T. A. (2013). “We wouldn’t of made friends if we didn’t come to Football United”: The impacts of a football program on young people’s peer, prosocial and cross-cultural relationships. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 399.
NSW Advocate for Children and Young People . (2017). Participation showcase. Retrieved from http://www.acyp.nsw.gov.au/participation
Parkinson, P., & Cashmore, J. (2008). The voice of a child in family law disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Qvortrup, J. (2009). Childhood as a structural form. In Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W., & Honig, M. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 2133). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Robinson, S., & Notara, D. (2015). Building belonging and connection for children with disability and their families. Community Development Journal, 50 (4), 724741.
Robson, E., Bell, S., & Klocker, N. (2007). Conceptualizing agency in the lives and actions of rural young people. In Panelli, R., Punch, S., & Robson, E. (Eds.), Global perspectives on rural childhood and youth: Young rural lives (pp. 135148). London: Routledge.
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Assault . (2017). Final report: Recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/final_report_-_recommendations.pdf
Scott, D. (2014). Children in Australia: Harms and hopes. Family Matters, 96, 1422.
Shier, H. (2016). Children’s rights in school: The perception of children in Nicaragua. PhD Thesis, Queen’s University Belfast. Retrieved from http://www.harryshier.net/docs/Shier-Childrens_Rights_in_School.pdf
Shier, H. (2019). An analytical tool to help researchers develop partnerships with children and adolescents. In Berson, I., Berson, M., & Gray, C. (Eds.), Participatory methodologies to elevate children’s voice and agency (pp. 293313). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Tisdall, E.K.M., & Punch, S. (2012). Not so new? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies, 10 (3), 249264.
UNICEF (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from: www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Grace et al. supplementary material
Grace et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (149 KB)
149 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed