Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T19:23:39.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal safety issues in the lives of children with learning disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Freda Briggs  and
Russell Hawkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An earlier evaluation of the New Zealand child protection program ‘Keeping Ourselves Safe’ found, inter alia, that girls with learning problems were highly vulnerable to drugs, sexual abuse and violence (Briggs & Hawkins 1996a). This led to the present study, the aim of which was to focus specifically on children with learning disabilities, and to include data from boys as well as girls.

Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from one hundred and sixteen students aged 11–17 years (61 females and 55 males) who were interviewed in special education units. Their common characteristics were that they had all been assessed as being 3 years or more behind their chronological age group in their development and achievement, they needed individually planned curricula across the range of school subjects, and they had all previously attended mainstream schools throughout the North and South Islands of New Zealand.

The study confirmed the vulnerability of children with learning disabilities to the risks of drugs, violence, psychological bullying, pornography and sexual abuse. Significant levels of violence in both schools and the home were found. The study also showed the need for special attention for the protection of boys.

It is possible that children with learning disabilities were targeted because they were seen as safer targets in terms of an expectation that they would be less aware of the difference between right and wrong and less likely than other children to make a report about any abusive behaviour. If this speculative hypothesis is correct, it means that children with learning disabilities require even more vigilant forms of protection than other children.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , 2005 , pp. 19 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. (1982) Teaching people with menial retardation about sexual abuse prevention, Illusion Theatre Guide, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1991a) ‘Child protection programs: Can they protect young children?’, Early Child Development and Care, 67, 61–72.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1991b) ‘Keeping Ourselves Safe: A personal curriculum examined’, NZCER/ACER Set Item 7, reproduced in Best of Set 1994.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1995) Developing personal safety skills in children with disabilities, London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. (1998) ‘South Australian parents want child protection programs to be offered in schools and pre-schools’, Early Child Development and Care, 34, 167–178.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1991) Evaluation of’Keeping Ourselves Safe’ curriculum used with children of 5–8 years in New Zealand schools, report for the Commissioner of Police and Ministry of Education, New Zealand, University of South Australia, Magill Campus.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1993) ‘Follow-up data on the effectiveness of New Zealand’s national school-based child protection program’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 8, 635–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1994) ‘Follow-up study of children of 5–8 years using child protection programs’, Early Child Development and Care, 100, 111–117.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1996a) ‘Keeping Ourselves Safe’: A survey of New Zealand School Children aged 10–12 years and their parents, report for the Commissioner of Police, New Zealand and the Minister of Education, University of South Australia, Magill Campus.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1996b) ‘A comparison of the childhood experiences of convicted male child molesters and men who were sexually abused in childhood and claimed to be ‘non-offenders”, Child Abuse and Neglect, 20(3), 221–233.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (1997) Child protection: A guide for teachers and child care professionals, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Briggs, F. & Hawkins, R. (2001) Safety issues for New Zealand Secondary Students, report for the Commissioner of Police, New Zealand, University of South Australia, Magill Campus.Google Scholar
Briggs, F., Hawkins, R. & Williams, M. (1994) A comparison of the early childhood and family experiences of incarcerated, convicted male child molesters and men who were sexually abused in childhood and have no convictions for sexual offences against children, report for the Australian Criminology Research Council, University of South Australia, Magill Campus.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, D., Asdigian, N. & Dziuba-Leatherman, J. (1993) Victimisation prevention training in action: A national survey of children ‘s experiences coping with actual threats and assaults, University of New Hampshire Family Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1995) Teaching and learning about personal safety: Report of the review of protective behaviours in South Australia, Adelaide: Painters Prints.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (1989) ‘The abuse of deaf children’, Child Abuse Review, Spring, 3–6.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (1990) The deaf child who is sexually abused – is there a need for a dual specialist?, London: National Deaf Society.Google Scholar
Layton, R. (2003) Our best investment: A slate plan to protect and advance the interest of the children, Government of South Australia.Google Scholar
Mounty, J.L. & Fetterman, R.J. (1989) An abuse prevention program for deaf and hard-of-hearing children, CAID Convention, San Diego, Calif., June.Google Scholar
Perniskie, L. (1995) Evaluation of Keeping Ourselves Safe, MA (Psychology) Thesis, Victoria University, Wellington.Google Scholar
Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service (1997) Final Report / Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service, Paedophile Inquiry (Volumes 4–6), NSW Police Integrity Commission.Google Scholar
Sanders, O. (New Zealand Police Youth Education Manager) (2005) Personal communication, January 11th.Google Scholar
Senn, C.Y. (1988) Vulnerable: Sexual abuse and people with an intellectual handicap, G. Allen Roeher Institute, Downsville, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Sobsey, D. (1994) Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P.M., Vernon, M. & Scanlan, J.M. (1987) ‘Sexual abuse of deaf youth’, American Annals of the Deaf, October, pp.256–62.Google Scholar
Woodward, J.H. (1990) Evaluating the implementation of the Keeping Ourselves Safe child sexual abuse prevention program, M.Ed. Thesis, Otago University, New Zealand.Google Scholar