Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Patterns of and Reasons for Infrequent Internet Use: A Qualitative Exploration of Australian Youth

  • Sora Park (a1)

Abstract

While there is a popular belief that the digital generation is immersed in and adept at using digital media, recent studies point to a large variation among young people in their appropriation of digital technologies. This study examined the patterns of, and reasons for, infrequent use of digital technology among the younger generation, by conducting semi-structured interviews with 19 school-aged Australian youth. Infrequent users focused narrowly on a small number of applications and did not explore the wide range of available activities. This was mainly due to their lack of confidence and the perceived irrelevance of digital technologies to their lives. Most participants in this study had chosen a vocational path where computers and the internet were not integral to their everyday learning experience. This deterred them from improving their digital media literacy. Based on observations, I argue that it is not sufficient merely to provide access to digital media; rather, users need motivation, skills and perceived benefits in order to utilise this technology fully. In the case of school-aged youth, schoolwork as well as their peer group culture influences how they situate themselves in the digital environment that surrounds them.

Copyright

Corresponding author

address for correspondence: Sora Park, Associate Professor, Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, Bruce, 2601 ACT, Australia E-mail: sora.park@canberra.edu.au

References

Hide All
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Australian social trends: Children of the digital revolution. Retrieved from http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/LookupAttach/4102.0Publication29.06.117/$File/41020_Childrendigital_Jun2011.pdf
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2013). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2012–13. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/8146.0Chapter12012-13
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 775786.
Brandtzaeg, P. B., Heim, J., & Karahasanovic, A. (2010). Understanding the new digital divide: A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123138.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2008). Success through partnership: Achieving a national vision for ICT in schools. Canberra: Australian Government.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Neckerman, K. (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 313334.
Ewing, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). The internet in Australia. ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, Swinburne University. Retrieved from http://www.worldinternetproject.net/_files/_//349_ccidigitalfutures2012final20070912.pdf
Eynon, R. (2009). Mapping the digital divide in Britain: implications for learning and education. Learning, Media & Technology, 34 (4), 277290.
Eynon, R., & Geniets, A. (2012). On the periphery? Understanding low and discontinued internet use amongst young people in Britain. Oxford, Oxford Internet Institute.
Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the ‘cyberkid’: Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4 (4), 451469.
Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: how technology knowledge impacts college students. New Media & Society, 12 (3), 497513.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864
Holmes, J. (2011). Cyberkids or divided generations? Characterising young people's internet use in the UK with generic, continuum or typological models. New Media & Society, 13 (7), 11041122.
Hope, A. (2012). The shackled school internet: Zemiological solutions to the problem of over-blocking. Learning, Media and Technology, 38 (3), 270283.
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., . . . Robinson, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Building the field of digital media and learning. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Jackson, C., Brown, J. D., & Pardun, C. J. (2008). A TV in the bedroom: Implications for viewing habits and risk behaviors during early adolescence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52 (3), 349367.
James, J. (2008). Digital divide complacency: Misconceptions and dangers. The Information Society, 24 (1), 5461.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26 (5), 344356.
Lee, C. (2009). The role of internet engagement in the health-knowledge gap. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53 (3), 365382.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9 (4), 671696.
Longley, P., Webber, R., & Li, C. (2006). The UK geography of the e-society: A national classification. London, UK: University College London.
Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56 (4), 10721082.
McMillan, S. J., & Morrison, M. (2006). Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people's lives. New Media & Society, 8 (1), 7395.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pedro, F. (2006). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERI.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the ‘disappearing digital divide’ versus the ‘emerging digital differentiation’ approach. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 293305.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. Horizon, 9 (5), 16.
Reisdorf, B. C. (2011). Non-adoption of the internet in Great Britain and Sweden. Information, Communication & Society, 14 (3), 400420.
Samuelsson, U. (2010). ICT use among 13-year-old Swedish children. Learning, Media and Technology, 35 (1), 1530.
Saunders, P., Naidoo, Y., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Towards new indicators of disadvantage: Deprivation and social exclusion in Australia. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of NSW.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6 (3), 341362.
Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 273292.
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Furlong, J. (2005). Whose Internet is it anyway? Exploring adults’ (non)use of the Internet in everyday life. European Journal of Communication, 20 (1), 526.
Stanley, L. D. (2003). Beyond access: Psychosocial barriers to computer literacy. Special Issue: ICTs and community networking.The Information Society: An International Journal, 19 (5), 407416.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. London: McGraw-Hill.
Thiessen, V., & Looker, D. E. (2007). Digital divides and capital conversion: The optimal use of information and communication technology for youth reading achievement. Information, Communication & Society, 10 (2), 159180.
Tsatsou, P. (2011). Digital divides revisited: What is new about divides and their research? Media, Culture & Society, 33 (2), 317331.
van Dijk, J. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34 (4–5), 221235.
Verdegem, P., & Verhoest, P. (2009). Profiling the non-user: Rethinking policy initiatives stimulating ICT acceptance. Telecommunications Policy, 33 (10–11), 642652.
Vicente, M., & Lopez, A. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for Internet use. Information Society, 26, 4864.
Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Wei, L. (2012). Number matters: The multimodality of Internet use as an indicator of the digital inequalities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (3), 303318.
Zickuhr, K. (2010). Generations 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project.

Keywords

Patterns of and Reasons for Infrequent Internet Use: A Qualitative Exploration of Australian Youth

  • Sora Park (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed