Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Out-of-home care: Building a national research agenda

  • Judy Cashmore (a1) and Frank Ainsworth (a2)

Abstract

This article presents the argument for the development of a national research agenda for out-of-home care and what is needed to make this agenda work. The need for a commitment to research, adequate funding and access to reliable data, plus the rapid transfer of research findings, into practice, is outlined. It also reports on the outcomes of a research agenda-building workshop sponsored by the National Child and Family Welfare Research Coalition and held in September 2002. This workshop provided an opportunity to generate a list of research question that researchers, service providers and practitioners saw as significant priorities in a national research agenda.

Copyright

Corresponding author

PO Box 733, Surry Hills, NSW 2010 Email: frankainsworth@hotmail.com

References

Hide All
Ainsworth, F. & Hansen, P. (2002) ‘Evidence based social work practice: A reachable goal?Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 10, 3649.
Alexander, G., Curtis, P.A. & Kluger, M.P. (2000) What works in child welfare, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (2002) Child Protection Australia 2000-2001, Canberra.
Barber, J.G. & Gilbertson, R. (2001) Foster care: The state of the art, Adelaide: Australian Centre for Community Services Research.
Barratt, M. (2003) ‘Organizational support for evidence-based practice: A collaborative study’, Child and Family Social Work, 8, 143150.
Barth, R.P. (1994) ‘Adoption research: Building blocks for the next decade’, Child Welfare, 73, 625638.
Cashmore, J., Dolby, R. & Brennan, D. (1994) Systems abuse, Sydney: NSW Child Protection Council.
Cheers, D. (2002) What's in a name? What out-of-home care managers think evidence-based practice really means?. Paper presented at ACWA Conference, What works? Evidence-based Practice in Child and Family Services, Bondi, September.
Courtney, M.E. (2000) Research need to improve the prospects for children in out-of-home placement', Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 743761.
Department of Human Services (South Australia) (1997) Family and Community Services Research workshop: Report of proceedings, Adelaide, Government of South Australia.
Gain, L. & Young, L. (1998) Outcome measurement in child protection: International literature review and critical analysis of child protection and alternative placement outcome measures, Sydney: Productivity Commission. Available at: http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/consultancy/childprt/childprt.pdf
Gelles, R. (2000) ‘How evaluation research can help reform and improve the child welfare system’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 4, 728.
Goerge, R., Wulczyn, F. & Fanshel, D. (1994) ‘A foster care research agenda for the '90s’, Child Welfare, 73, 525549.
Koch, R. (1998) The 80/20 principle: The secret to success by achieving more with less, New York: Currency Doubleday.
Maluccio, A.N., Ainsworth, F. & Thoburn, J. (2000) Child welfare outcome research in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Press.
Macdonald, G. (2001) Effective interventions for child abuse and neglect. An evidenced-based approach to planning and evaluating interventions, Chichester: John Wiley.
National Council on Research in Child Welfare (1994) ‘Special issue. A research agenda for child Welfare’. Child Welfare, 73, 355655.
Newman, T. (undated). Developing evidence based practice in social care: Locating, appraising and using research findings on effectiveness: Guidelines for Practitioners, Barnardos: Available at www.ex.ac.uk/cebss/pages/publications/EvGuide%20latest.doc
Owen, J.M. (1993) Program evaluation, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Pecora, P. (2002a) The challenge of achieving evidence-based practice in child and family services, keynote presentation to Workshop, Association of Children's Welfare Agencies (ACWA), Child and Family Welfare Association of Australia (CAFWAA), and the National Association for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (NAPCAN) Conference, September 2002, Sydney.
Pecora, P. (2002b) Building a national research agenda: Lessons from some American initiatives, presentation to Workshop, Association of Children's Welfare Agencies (ACWA). Child and Family Welfare Association of Australia (CAFWAA), and the National Association for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (NAPCAN) Conference, September 2002, Sydney.
Pecora, P., Seelig, W.R., Zirps, F.A. & Davies, S.M. (1996) Quality improvement and evaluation in child and family services, Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Pietrzak, J., Ramler, M., Renner, T., Ford, L. & Gilbert, N. (1990) Practical program evaluation: Examples from child abuse prevention, Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
Rutter, M. (2000) ‘Children in substitute care: Some conceptual considerations and research implications’, Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 685703.
Sanson, A., Nicholson, J., Ungerer, J., Zubrick, S. et al. (2002) Introducing the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children: LSAC Discussion Paper 1, Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Available at http://www.aifs.gov.au/growingup/pubs/discussionpaper1.pdf
Scott, K.G., Mason, C.A. & Chapman, D.A. (1999) ‘The use of epidemiological methodology as a means of influencing public policy’, Child Development, 70, 12631273.
Stevenson, O. (Ed.) (1999) Child Welfare in the UK, Oxford: Blackwell.
Testa, M.F., Johnson, M.A. & Wells, S.J. (1999) A child welfare research agenda for the State of Illinois, www.social.uiuc.edu/htmtesta.htm
Tozer, C.L. & Ray, S. (2001) ‘20 questions: the research needs of children and family social workers’, Research Policy and Planning, 17(1). Available on-line at http://www.elsc.org.uk/socialcareresource/rpp/articles/1711999art3.htm
UK Department of Health (1991) Patterns and outcomes in child placement: Messages from current research and their implications, London: HMSO.
Vecchiato, T., Maluccio, A.N. & Canali, C. (2002) Evaluation in child and family services: Comparative client and program perspectives, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Wald, M.S., Carlsmith, J.M. & Leiderman, P.H. (1988) Protecting abused and neglected children, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Waldfogel, J. (2000) ‘Child welfare research: How adequate are the data?’. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 705741.
Weyts, A., Morpeth, L. & Bullock, R. (2000) ‘Department of Health Research Overviews - Past, Present and Future: An evaluation of the dissemination of the Blue Book’, Child Protection: Messages from Research, Child and Family Social Work 5, 215223.
Wulczyn, F.H. (1996) ‘Note on research: A statistical and methodological framework for analysing the foster care experiences of children’, Social Service Review, 70, 318329.
Wulczyn, F.H. (2001) An evidence base for child welfare policy: The need and a proposed framework, presentation to the Child Welfare League of America, June.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Out-of-home care: Building a national research agenda

  • Judy Cashmore (a1) and Frank Ainsworth (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.